» Articles » PMID: 35553043

Efficacy and Safety of N-acetyl-GED-0507-34-LEVO Gel in Patients with Moderate-to Severe Facial Acne Vulgaris: a Phase IIb Randomized Double-blind, Vehicle-controlled Trial

Abstract

Background: Preliminary in vitro and in vivo studies have supported the efficacy of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ (PPARγ) modulator N-acetyl-GED-0507-34-LEVO (NAC-GED) for the treatment of acne-inducing sebocyte differentiation, improving sebum composition and controlling the inflammatory process.

Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of NAC-GED (5% and 2%) in patients with moderate-to-severe facial acne vulgaris.

Methods: This double-blind phase II randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted at 36 sites in Germany, Italy and Poland. Patients aged 12-30 years with facial acne, an Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) score of 3-4, and an inflammatory and noninflammatory lesion count of 20-100 were randomized to topical application of the study drug (2% or 5%) or placebo (vehicle), once daily for 12 weeks. The co-primary efficacy endpoints were percentage change from baseline in total lesion count (TLC) and IGA success at week 12; the safety endpoints were adverse events (AEs) and serious AEs. This study was registered with EudraCT (2018-003307-19).

Results: Between Q1 in 2019 and Q1 in 2020 450 patients [n = 418 (92·9%) IGA 3; n = 32 (7·1%) IGA 4] were randomly assigned to NAC-GED 5% (n = 150), NAC-GED 2% (n = 150) or vehicle (n = 150). The percentage change in TLC reduction was statistically significantly higher in both the NAC-GED 5% [-57·1%, 95% confidence interval (CI) -60·8 to -53·4; P < 0·001] and NAC-GED 2% (-44·7%, 95% CI -49·1 to -40·1; P < 0·001) groups compared with vehicle (-33·9%, 95% CI -37·6 to -30·2). A higher proportion of patients treated with NAC-GED 5% experienced IGA success (45%, 95% CI 38-53) vs. the vehicle group (24%, 95% CI 18-31; P < 0·001). The IGA success rate was 33% in the NAC-GED 2% group (P = not significant vs. vehicle). The percentage of patients who had one or more AEs was 19%, 16% and 19% in the NAC-GED 5%, NAC-GED 2% and vehicle groups, respectively.

Conclusions: The topical application of NAC-GED 5% reduced TLC, increased the IGA success rate and was safe for use in patients with acne vulgaris. Thus, NAC-GED, a new PPARγ modulator, showed an effective clinical response. What is already known about this topic? Acne vulgaris, one of the most common dermatological diseases, affects more than 85% of adolescents. There is a medical need for innovative and safe treatment of acne vulgaris. The peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ (PPARγ) is involved in lipid metabolism and specifically in cell differentiation, sebum production and the inflammatory reaction. What does this study add? N-acetyl-GED-0507-34-LEVO (NAC-GED 5%), a PPARγ modulator, significantly improves acne manifestations in patients with moderate-to-severe acne and is safe and well tolerated. The results suggest that the PPARγ receptor is a novel therapeutic target for acne. The results provide a basis for a large phase III trial to assess the effectiveness and safety profile of NAC-GED in combating a disease that afflicts 80-90% of adolescents.

Citing Articles

The Role of the Skin Microbiome in Acne: Challenges and Future Therapeutic Opportunities.

Niedzwiedzka A, Micallef M, Biazzo M, Podrini C Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25(21).

PMID: 39518974 PMC: 11546345. DOI: 10.3390/ijms252111422.


New Insights into the Role of PPARγ in Skin Physiopathology.

Briganti S, Mosca S, Di Nardo A, Flori E, Ottaviani M Biomolecules. 2024; 14(6).

PMID: 38927131 PMC: 11201613. DOI: 10.3390/biom14060728.


The antibacterial activity of berberine against : its therapeutic potential in inflammatory acne.

Sun L, Yu Q, Peng F, Sun C, Wang D, Pu L Front Microbiol. 2024; 14:1276383.

PMID: 38249466 PMC: 10797013. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1276383.


The Microbiome and Acne: Perspectives for Treatment.

Dessinioti C, Katsambas A Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2024; 14(1):31-44.

PMID: 38183614 PMC: 10828138. DOI: 10.1007/s13555-023-01079-8.


Antibiotics and Antimicrobial Resistance in Acne: Epidemiological Trends and Clinical Practice Considerations.

Dessinioti C, Katsambas A Yale J Biol Med. 2022; 95(4):429-443.

PMID: 36568833 PMC: 9765333.


References
1.
Alkhodaidi S, Al Hawsawi K, Alkhudaidi I, Magzoub D, Abu-Zaid A . Efficacy and safety of topical clascoterone cream for treatment of acne vulgaris: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized placebo-controlled trials. Dermatol Ther. 2020; 34(1):e14609. DOI: 10.1111/dth.14609. View

2.
Mastrofrancesco A, Ottaviani M, Cardinali G, Flori E, Briganti S, Ludovici M . Pharmacological PPARγ modulation regulates sebogenesis and inflammation in SZ95 human sebocytes. Biochem Pharmacol. 2017; 138:96-106. DOI: 10.1016/j.bcp.2017.04.030. View

3.
Pirat C, Farce A, Lebegue N, Renault N, Furman C, Millet R . Targeting peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs): development of modulators. J Med Chem. 2012; 55(9):4027-61. DOI: 10.1021/jm101360s. View

4.
Thiboutot D, Dreno B, Abanmi A, F Alexis A, Araviiskaia E, Barona Cabal M . Practical management of acne for clinicians: An international consensus from the Global Alliance to Improve Outcomes in Acne. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2017; 78(2 Suppl 1):S1-S23.e1. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2017.09.078. View

5.
Higgins L, DePaoli A . Selective peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARgamma) modulation as a strategy for safer therapeutic PPARgamma activation. Am J Clin Nutr. 2009; 91(1):267S-272S. DOI: 10.3945/ajcn.2009.28449E. View