» Articles » PMID: 35552941

Liver Disease and Poor Adherence Limit Hepatitis C Cure: A Real-World Australian Treatment Cohort

Abstract

Background And Aims: In 2016, direct-acting antiviral (DAA) treatment for hepatitis C (HCV) became available through Australia's universal health care system, with the aim of HCV elimination. We report real-world effectiveness of DAA HCV treatment in Australia from a clinically well-informed cohort, enriched for cirrhosis and prior HCV treatment.

Methods: 3413 patients were recruited from 26 hospital liver clinics across Australia from February 2016 to June 2020. Clinical history and sustained viral response (SVR) were obtained from medical records and data linkage to the Australian Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme. Factors associated with SVR were assessed by multivariable logistic regression (MVR).

Results: At recruitment, 32.2% had cirrhosis (72.9% Child Pugh class B/C), and 19.9% were treatment experienced. Of the 2,939 with data, 93.3% confirmed SVR. 137 patients received second-line therapy. Patients with cirrhosis had lower SVR rate (88.4 vs. 95.8%; p < 0.001). On MVR, failure to achieve SVR was associated with Genotype 3 (adj-OR = 0.42, 95%CI 0.29-0.61), male gender (adj-OR = 0.49, 95%CI 0.31-0.77), fair/poor adherence (adj-OR = 0.52, 95%CI 0.28-0.94), cirrhosis (adj-OR = 0.57, 95%CI 0.36-0.88), FIB-4 > 3.25 (adj-OR = 0.52, 95%CI 0.33-0.83) and MELD score ≥ 20 (adj-OR = 0.25, 95%CI 0.08-0.80). Consistent results were seen in cirrhotic sub-analysis.

Conclusions: Excellent SVR rates were achieved with DAAs in this real-world cohort of patients with chronic HCV infection. More advanced liver disease and clinician impression of poor adherence were associated with HCV treatment failure. Supports to improve liver fibrosis assessment skills for non-specialist DAA prescribers in the community and to optimize patient adherence are likely to enable more effective pursuit of HCV elimination in Australia.

Citing Articles

Loss to follow-up of patients after antiviral treatment as an additional barrier to HCV elimination.

Zarebska-Michaluk D, Brzdek M, Tronina O, Janocha-Litwin J, Sitko M, Piekarska A BMC Med. 2024; 22(1):486.

PMID: 39444018 PMC: 11515622. DOI: 10.1186/s12916-024-03699-z.


In-Host Flat-like Quasispecies: Characterization Methods and Clinical Implications.

Gregori J, Colomer-Castell S, Ibanez-Lligona M, Garcia-Cehic D, Campos C, Buti M Microorganisms. 2024; 12(5).

PMID: 38792840 PMC: 11124460. DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms12051011.


Hepatitis C treatment outcomes for Australian First Nations Peoples: equivalent SVR rate but higher rates of loss to follow-up.

Clark P, Valery P, Ward J, Strasser S, Weltman M, Thompson A BMC Gastroenterol. 2022; 22(1):339.

PMID: 35820850 PMC: 9275019. DOI: 10.1186/s12876-022-02416-5.

References
1.
Rosen H . "Hep C, where art thou": What are the remaining (fundable) questions in hepatitis C virus research?. Hepatology. 2016; 65(1):341-349. DOI: 10.1002/hep.28848. View

2.
Stafford F, Dore G, Clackett S, Martinello M, Matthews G, Grebely J . Prescribing of direct-acting antiviral therapy by general practitioners for people with hepatitis C in an unrestricted treatment program. Med J Aust. 2021; 215(7):332-333. DOI: 10.5694/mja2.51204. View

3.
Lin Z, Xin Y, Dong Q, Wang Q, Jiang X, Zhan S . Performance of the aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index for the staging of hepatitis C-related fibrosis: an updated meta-analysis. Hepatology. 2011; 53(3):726-36. DOI: 10.1002/hep.24105. View

4.
Mushtaq S, Mansoor A, Umar M, Khan A, Siddiqi S, Manzoor S . Direct-acting antiviral agents in the treatment of chronic hepatitis C-Real-life experience from clinical practices in Pakistan. J Med Virol. 2020; 92(12):3475-3487. DOI: 10.1002/jmv.25745. View

5.
Razavi H, Waked I, Sarrazin C, Myers R, Idilman R, Calinas F . The present and future disease burden of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection with today's treatment paradigm. J Viral Hepat. 2014; 21 Suppl 1:34-59. DOI: 10.1111/jvh.12248. View