» Articles » PMID: 35552440

Early Prediction of Acute Necrotizing Pancreatitis by Artificial Intelligence: a Prospective Cohort-analysis of 2387 Cases

Abstract

Pancreatic necrosis is a consistent prognostic factor in acute pancreatitis (AP). However, the clinical scores currently in use are either too complicated or require data that are unavailable on admission or lack sufficient predictive value. We therefore aimed to develop a tool to aid in necrosis prediction. The XGBoost machine learning algorithm processed data from 2387 patients with AP. The confidence of the model was estimated by a bootstrapping method and interpreted via the 10th and the 90th percentiles of the prediction scores. Shapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) values were calculated to quantify the contribution of each variable provided. Finally, the model was implemented as an online application using the Streamlit Python-based framework. The XGBoost classifier provided an AUC value of 0.757. Glucose, C-reactive protein, alkaline phosphatase, gender and total white blood cell count have the most impact on prediction based on the SHAP values. The relationship between the size of the training dataset and model performance shows that prediction performance can be improved. This study combines necrosis prediction and artificial intelligence. The predictive potential of this model is comparable to the current clinical scoring systems and has several advantages over them.

Citing Articles

The 12-Year Experience of the Hungarian Pancreatic Study Group.

Szentesi A, Hegyi P, The Hungarian Pancreatic Study Group J Clin Med. 2025; 14(4).

PMID: 40004893 PMC: 11855942. DOI: 10.3390/jcm14041362.


A systematic review of machine learning-based prognostic models for acute pancreatitis: Towards improving methods and reporting quality.

Critelli B, Hassan A, Lahooti I, Noh L, Park J, Tong K PLoS Med. 2025; 22(2):e1004432.

PMID: 39992936 PMC: 11870378. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004432.


Advances in the clinical application of machine learning in acute pancreatitis: a review.

Tan Z, Li G, Zheng Y, Li Q, Cai W, Tu J Front Med (Lausanne). 2025; 11():1487271.

PMID: 39839637 PMC: 11747317. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1487271.


Application of deep learning models for accurate classification of fluid collections in acute necrotizing pancreatitis on computed tomography: a multicenter study.

Gupta P, Siddiqui R, Singh S, Pradhan N, Shah J, Samanta J Abdom Radiol (NY). 2024; .

PMID: 39347977 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-024-04607-y.


Predicting the risk of early intensive care unit admission for patients hospitalized with acute pancreatitis using supervised machine learning.

Ali H, Inayat F, Dhillon R, Patel P, Afzal A, Wilkinson C Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 2024; 37(3):437-447.

PMID: 38628340 PMC: 11018057. DOI: 10.1080/08998280.2024.2326371.


References
1.
Troyanskaya O, Cantor M, Sherlock G, Brown P, Hastie T, Tibshirani R . Missing value estimation methods for DNA microarrays. Bioinformatics. 2001; 17(6):520-5. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/17.6.520. View

2.
Banks P, Bollen T, Dervenis C, Gooszen H, Johnson C, Sarr M . Classification of acute pancreatitis--2012: revision of the Atlanta classification and definitions by international consensus. Gut. 2012; 62(1):102-11. DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2012-302779. View

3.
Khanna A, Meher S, Prakash S, Tiwary S, Singh U, Srivastava A . Comparison of Ranson, Glasgow, MOSS, SIRS, BISAP, APACHE-II, CTSI Scores, IL-6, CRP, and Procalcitonin in Predicting Severity, Organ Failure, Pancreatic Necrosis, and Mortality in Acute Pancreatitis. HPB Surg. 2013; 2013:367581. PMC: 3800571. DOI: 10.1155/2013/367581. View

4.
Chen P, Chang D, Wu T, Wu M, Wang W, Liao W . Applications of artificial intelligence in pancreatic and biliary diseases. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021; 36(2):286-294. DOI: 10.1111/jgh.15380. View

5.
Abu-Eshy S, Abolfotouh M, Nawar E, Abu Sabib A . Ranson's criteria for acute pancreatitis in high altitude: do they need to be modified?. Saudi J Gastroenterol. 2009; 14(1):20-3. PMC: 2702891. DOI: 10.4103/1319-3767.37797. View