» Articles » PMID: 35545986

Factors Influencing Place of Death and Disenrollment Among Patients Receiving Specialist Palliative Care

Overview
Journal Acta Biomed
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2022 May 12
PMID 35545986
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background And Aim Of The Work: Place of death and disenrollment from specialized palliative care services (SPCSs) are two aspects that determine service utilization. These aspects should be determined by patient needs and preferences, but they are often associated to patient sociodemographic or contextual characteristics. The aim of this study was to describe which factors are associated with utilizing SPCSs in terms of place of death and disenrollment.

Methods: Retrospective cohort study. Patients (>18 years) who died or were disenrolled during SPCSs utilization. Two hierarchical regression models were performed, and variables were categorized in predisposing, enabling, and need factors according to the Andersen behavioral model of health services use.

Results: We included 35,869 patients (52,5% male, mean age 74,6 ± 12,3 SD), where 17,225 patients died in hospice and 16,953 at home, while 1,691 patients were disenrolled. Dying at home was associated with older age, oncological diagnosis, painful symptoms and longer survival time. Instead, service disenrollment was associated with less education, longer wait time and longer length of stay.

Conclusions: SPCS utilization was not influenced only by patient need, but also by other factors, such as social and contextual factors. These factors need to be considered by health care providers and efforts are needed for 1) identifying barriers and implementing effective interventions to support patients and caregivers in their preferred place of care and death and 2) for avoiding SPCS disenrollment with an increased probability of aggressive treatments and worse quality of life for patients.

Citing Articles

EOLinPLACE: an international research project to reform the way dying places are classified and understood.

Namukwaya E, Bruno de Sousa A, Lopes S, Touwen D, van der Steen J, Belanger E Palliat Care Soc Pract. 2024; 18:26323524231222498.

PMID: 38357678 PMC: 10865961. DOI: 10.1177/26323524231222498.

References
1.
Benini F, Fabris M, Pace D, Verno V, Negro V, De Conno F . Awareness, understanding and attitudes of Italians regarding palliative care. Ann Ist Super Sanita. 2011; 47(3):253-9. DOI: 10.4415/ANN_11_03_03. View

2.
Carlson M, Herrin J, Du Q, Epstein A, Cherlin E, Morrison R . Hospice characteristics and the disenrollment of patients with cancer. Health Serv Res. 2009; 44(6):2004-21. PMC: 2796311. DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2009.01002.x. View

3.
Yeh S, Ng Y, Wu S . Hospital and Patient Characteristics Regarding the Place of Death of Hospitalized Impending Death Patients: A Multilevel Analysis. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019; 16(23). PMC: 6926854. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16234609. View

4.
DAngelo D, Di Nitto M, Giannarelli D, Croci I, Latina R, Marchetti A . Inequity in palliative care service full utilisation among patients with advanced cancer: a retrospective Cohort study. Acta Oncol. 2020; 59(6):620-627. DOI: 10.1080/0284186X.2020.1736335. View

5.
Jonsson B, Holde G, Baker S . The role of psychosocial factors and treatment need in dental service use and oral health among adults in Norway. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2020; 48(3):215-224. DOI: 10.1111/cdoe.12518. View