» Articles » PMID: 35545388

STAndardised DIagnostic Assessment for Children and Young People with Emotional Difficulties (STADIA): Protocol for a Multicentre Randomised Controlled Trial

Abstract

Introduction: Emotional disorders (such as anxiety and depression) are associated with considerable distress and impairment in day-to-day function for affected children and young people and for their families. Effective evidence-based interventions are available but require appropriate identification of difficulties to enable timely access to services. Standardised diagnostic assessment (SDA) tools may aid in the detection of emotional disorders, but there is limited evidence on the utility of SDA tools in routine care and equipoise among professionals about their clinical value.

Methods And Analysis: A multicentre, two-arm, parallel group randomised controlled trial, with embedded qualitative and health economic components. Participants will be randomised in a 1:1 ratio to either the Development and Well-Being Assessment SDA tool as an adjunct to usual clinical care, or usual care only. A total of 1210 participants (children and young people referred to outpatient, specialist Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services with emotional difficulties and their parent/carers) will be recruited from at least 6 sites in England. The primary outcome is a clinician-made diagnosis about the presence of an emotional disorder within 12 months of randomisation. Secondary outcomes include referral acceptance, diagnosis and treatment of emotional disorders, symptoms of emotional difficulties and comorbid disorders and associated functional impairment.

Ethics And Dissemination: The study received favourable opinion from the South Birmingham Research Ethics Committee (Ref. 19/WM/0133). Results of this trial will be reported to the funder and published in full in the Health Technology Assessment (HTA) Journal series and also submitted for publication in a peer reviewed journal.

Trial Registration Number: ISRCTN15748675; Pre-results.

Citing Articles

Snakes and Ladders: The experience of being referred to and seen by Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services.

Newman K, Sayal K, Ewart C, Lang A, Bhardwaj A, Dubicka B SSM Ment Health. 2024; 6:100343.

PMID: 39678451 PMC: 11635093. DOI: 10.1016/j.ssmmh.2024.100343.


Mental health in clinically referred children and young people before and during the Covid-19 pandemic.

Sayal K, Partlett C, Bhardwaj A, Dubicka B, Marshall T, Gledhill J Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2022; 32(12):2657-2666.

PMID: 36526804 PMC: 9758019. DOI: 10.1007/s00787-022-02115-2.

References
1.
Pickles A, Le Couteur A, Leadbitter K, Salomone E, Cole-Fletcher R, Tobin H . Parent-mediated social communication therapy for young children with autism (PACT): long-term follow-up of a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2016; 388(10059):2501-2509. PMC: 5121131. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31229-6. View

2.
Colman I, Wadsworth M, Croudace T, Jones P . Forty-year psychiatric outcomes following assessment for internalizing disorder in adolescence. Am J Psychiatry. 2007; 164(1):126-33. DOI: 10.1176/ajp.2007.164.1.126. View

3.
Martin A, Fishman R, Baxter L, Ford T . Practitioners' attitudes towards the use of standardized diagnostic assessment in routine practice: a qualitative study in two child and adolescent mental health services. Clin Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2011; 16(3):407-20. DOI: 10.1177/1359104510366284. View

4.
Muris P, Meesters C, van den Berg F . The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ)--further evidence for its reliability and validity in a community sample of Dutch children and adolescents. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2003; 12(1):1-8. DOI: 10.1007/s00787-003-0298-2. View

5.
Yao S, Zhang C, Zhu X, Jing X, McWhinnie C, Abela J . Measuring adolescent psychopathology: psychometric properties of the self-report strengths and difficulties questionnaire in a sample of Chinese adolescents. J Adolesc Health. 2009; 45(1):55-62. DOI: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2008.11.006. View