» Articles » PMID: 35543928

How Does Mass Loss Compare with Total Body Score when Assessing Decomposition of Human and Pig Cadavers?

Overview
Date 2022 May 11
PMID 35543928
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Providing accurate and reliable measures of decomposition is paramount for forensic research where decomposition progress is used to estimate time of death. Mass loss is routinely used as a direct measure of biomass decomposition in ecological studies, yet few studies have analysed mass loss in a forensic context on human cadavers to determine its usefulness for modelling the decomposition process. Mass loss was examined in decomposing human and pig cadavers, and compared with other common decomposition metrics, such as total body score (TBS). One summer and one winter field decomposition experiment was conducted using human and pig cadavers, as pigs are often used as proxies for human cadavers in forensic research. The two measures of decomposition revealed two contrasting patterns of decomposition on pigs and humans, particularly in winter where TBS stabilised at similar values, but mass loss differed greatly. Mass loss was found to be faster in pigs than humans during early decomposition. Pigs lost 75% of their mass in winter, while humans lost less than 50%; however, in summer, both lost around 80% of their mass. TBS displayed similar patterns in both experiments, with TBS increasing more rapidly in pigs compared with humans but both eventually reaching similar TBS values in late decomposition. Measuring mass loss can provide additional information about decomposition progress that is missed if using TBS only. Key differences in decomposition progress between cadaver types were also observed, suggesting caution when extrapolating data from pigs to humans for forensic research and decomposition modelling.

Citing Articles

Accuracy of estimating postmortem interval using the relationship between total body score and accumulated degree-days: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Lopez-Lazaro S, Castillo-Alonso C Int J Legal Med. 2024; 138(6):2659-2670.

PMID: 39112744 DOI: 10.1007/s00414-024-03304-1.


A synthesis of carcass decomposition studies conducted at a tropical (Aw) taphonomy facility: 2013-2022.

Carter D, Orimoto A, Gutierrez C, Ribereau-Gayon A, Pecsi E, Perrault K Forensic Sci Int Synerg. 2023; 7:100345.

PMID: 37609572 PMC: 10440585. DOI: 10.1016/j.fsisyn.2023.100345.


Bridging the gap between decomposition theory and forensic research on postmortem interval.

Dawson B, Ueland M, Carter D, Mclntyre D, Barton P Int J Legal Med. 2023; 138(2):509-518.

PMID: 37491634 PMC: 10861637. DOI: 10.1007/s00414-023-03060-8.

References
1.
Dawson B, Barton P, Wallman J . Contrasting insect activity and decomposition of pigs and humans in an Australian environment: A preliminary study. Forensic Sci Int. 2020; 316:110515. DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2020.110515. View

2.
Pearce A, Richards R, Milz S, Schneider E, Pearce S . Animal models for implant biomaterial research in bone: a review. Eur Cell Mater. 2007; 13:1-10. DOI: 10.22203/ecm.v013a01. View

3.
Matuszewski S, Hall M, Moreau G, Schoenly K, Tarone A, Villet M . Pigs vs people: the use of pigs as analogues for humans in forensic entomology and taphonomy research. Int J Legal Med. 2019; 134(2):793-810. PMC: 7044136. DOI: 10.1007/s00414-019-02074-5. View

4.
Dawson B, Wallman J, Evans M, Barton P . Is Resource Change a Useful Predictor of Carrion Insect Succession on Pigs and Humans?. J Med Entomol. 2021; 58(6):2228-2235. DOI: 10.1093/jme/tjab072. View

5.
Goff M . Early post-mortem changes and stages of decomposition in exposed cadavers. Exp Appl Acarol. 2009; 49(1-2):21-36. DOI: 10.1007/s10493-009-9284-9. View