» Articles » PMID: 35542243

GIS-based Evaluation of Groundwater Geochemistry and Statistical Determination of the Fate of Contaminants in Shallow Aquifers from Different Functional Areas of Agra City, India: Levels and Spatial Distributions

Overview
Journal RSC Adv
Specialty Chemistry
Date 2022 May 11
PMID 35542243
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The quality of groundwater is very important in Agra because groundwater is the main source of water for drinking, domestic, agricultural and industrial uses. A groundwater geochemistry study was conducted in Agra where 28 samples were collected from shallow aquifers in May 2016 from different sites. The aim of this research was to assess the quality of groundwater for drinking purposes in the study area. Arc-GIS has been used to prepare geographic information system-based spatial distribution maps of different major elements. The groundwater quality was analyzed for various physico-chemical parameters, major cations and anions and some trace metals. The observed values were compared with BIS and WHO standards. Statistical parameters such as the mean, median, standard deviation, skewness and kurtosis were used to analyze the hydrogeochemical characteristics of the groundwater. Correlation coefficient analysis and principal component analysis (PCA) were performed to identify the sources of the water constituents. Our results showed that most of the samples exceeded the acceptable limit for drinking water standards. The sequence of abundance of the main cations was generally Na > Ca > Mg > K, while the anions in order of abundance were HCO > Cl > SO and NO > F. All of the trace metals were within the permissible limit except for iron and manganese. The hazard index value of 5.7 × 10 indicated that there was no potential health risk in the study area. Ca, Mg, Cl and SO were the dominant hydrogeochemical facies in the majority of the groundwater samples. Most of the parameters such as TDS, Cl, HCO , SO , NO , Ca, Mg, Na, K and TH showed strong correlations with each other, which were due to natural processes such as weathering, exchangeable ions and reduction/oxidation, as well as anthropogenic activity around the study area. The water quality index indicated that the water quality was poor at 46.43% of the sampling sites, very poor at 28.57% of the sites and unsuitable for drinking purposes at 25% of the sampling sites. Gibbs diagrams suggested rock weathering as a major driving force for controlling the groundwater chemistry in the study area, along with evaporation as a minor influence.

Citing Articles

Ecotoxic effect in Allium cepa due to sphalerite weathering arising in calcareous conditions.

Ponce-Pena P, Lopez-Ortega A, Anguiano-Vega G, Sosa-Rodriguez F, Vazquez-Arenas J, Ramirez-Aldaba H Environ Geochem Health. 2024; 46(3):87.

PMID: 38367090 DOI: 10.1007/s10653-024-01857-z.


GIS-statically-based modelling the groundwater quality assessment coupled with soil and terrain attributes data.

Chen Y PLoS One. 2023; 18(11):e0292680.

PMID: 38033022 PMC: 10688863. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0292680.


Microbial Biosurfactant: as a Potential Remediator of Environments Contaminated by Heavy Metals.

da Silva R, Santos J, Meira H, Almeida S, Sarubbo L, Luna J Microorganisms. 2023; 11(11).

PMID: 38004783 PMC: 10673205. DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms11112772.


Multivariate statistical and hydrochemical approaches for evaluation of groundwater quality in north Bahri city-Sudan.

Mohammed M, Szabo N, Szucs P Heliyon. 2022; 8(11):e11308.

PMID: 36353162 PMC: 9638764. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11308.


Multivariate statistics and hydrogeochemistry of deep groundwater at southwestern part of Bangladesh.

Das T, Ahmed S, Hossen A, Rahaman M, Rahman M Heliyon. 2022; 8(10):e11206.

PMID: 36340002 PMC: 9634021. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11206.


References
1.
Gibbs R . Mechanisms controlling world water chemistry. Science. 1970; 170(3962):1088-90. DOI: 10.1126/science.170.3962.1088. View

2.
Jaishankar M, Tseten T, Anbalagan N, Mathew B, Beeregowda K . Toxicity, mechanism and health effects of some heavy metals. Interdiscip Toxicol. 2015; 7(2):60-72. PMC: 4427717. DOI: 10.2478/intox-2014-0009. View

3.
Mohankumar K, Hariharan V, Rao N . Heavy Metal Contamination in Groundwater around Industrial Estate vs Residential Areas in Coimbatore, India. J Clin Diagn Res. 2016; 10(4):BC05-7. PMC: 4866086. DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/15943.7527. View

4.
Bacquart T, Frisbie S, Mitchell E, Grigg L, Cole C, Small C . Multiple inorganic toxic substances contaminating the groundwater of Myingyan Township, Myanmar: arsenic, manganese, fluoride, iron, and uranium. Sci Total Environ. 2015; 517:232-45. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.02.038. View

5.
Edokpayi J, Enitan A, Mutileni N, Odiyo J . Evaluation of water quality and human risk assessment due to heavy metals in groundwater around Muledane area of Vhembe District, Limpopo Province, South Africa. Chem Cent J. 2018; 12(1):2. PMC: 5764906. DOI: 10.1186/s13065-017-0369-y. View