» Articles » PMID: 35539303

Differential CRABP-II and FABP5 Expression Patterns and Implications for Medulloblastoma Retinoic Acid Sensitivity

Overview
Journal RSC Adv
Specialty Chemistry
Date 2022 May 11
PMID 35539303
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Medulloblastoma (MB) cells exhibit different responses to retinoid acid (RA) for reasons that are poorly understood. RA signaling can be transduced by two approaches that are mediated by cellular retinoic acid-binding protein 2 (CRABP-II) as a tumor-suppressive pathway, and by fatty acid-binding protein 5 (FABP5) as a tumor-promoting pathway. The biological effects of RA on cancer cells are largely determined by the patterns of CRABP-II and FABP5 expression. This study aims to profile the statuses of CRABP-II and FABP5 expression in MB and to evaluate their correlation with RA sensitivities using RA-sensitive (Med-3) and RA-insensitive (UW228-2, UW228-3) MB cells. Our results show that CRABP-II is distinctly expressed and the level of FABP5 is extremely low in Med-3 cells, while the patterns of CRABP-II and FABP5 expression are reversed in UW228-2 and UW228-3 cells. RA up-regulates CRABP-II expression in Med-3 cells, whereas it up-regulates FABP5 expression in the other two cell lines. The FABP5-specific inhibitor BMS309403 increases the RA sensitivity of UW228-2 cells ( < 0.01). Tissue microarray-based immunohistochemical staining showed CRABP-II/FABP5 expression patterns in MB that were variable (CRABP-II-/FABP5-, CRABP-II-/FABP5+, CRABP-II+/FABP5- and CRABP-II+/FABP5+) and imbalanced (CRABP-II↑/FABP5↓ and CRABP-II↓/FABP5↑). MB cases exhibited patterns ofCRABP-II-/FABP5- (12.24%, 6/49), CRABP-II-/FABP5+ (30.61%, 15/49) or CRABP-II↓/FABP5↑ (12.24%, 6/49), implicating unresponsiveness or insensitivity to RA. In conclusion, the ratios of CRABP-II/FABP5 levels are closely related to the RA sensitivities of MB cells. The differential CRABP-II and FABP5 expression patterns are prospective parameters, and of potential value in personalized RA therapy for MB.

Citing Articles

Cross-sectional study of proteomic differences between moderate and severe psoriasis.

Wu L, Cen C, Xie B, Hu L, Huang J, Shen N Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):3387.

PMID: 39870771 PMC: 11772871. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-87252-9.


Significance of stress keratin expression in normal and diseased epithelia.

Cohen E, Johnson C, Wasikowski R, Billi A, Tsoi L, Kahlenberg J iScience. 2024; 27(2):108805.

PMID: 38299111 PMC: 10828818. DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.108805.


One-year longitudinal study of the stratum corneum proteome of retinol and all-trans-retinoic acid treated human skin: an orchestrated molecular event.

Abed K, Foucher A, Bernard D, Tancrede-Bohin E, Cavusoglu N Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):11196.

PMID: 37433822 PMC: 10336116. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-37750-5.

References
1.
Xia S, Wu M, Li H, Wang J, Chen N, Chen X . CRABP-II- and FABP5-independent responsiveness of human glioblastoma cells to all-trans retinoic acid. Oncotarget. 2015; 6(8):5889-902. PMC: 4467409. DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.3334. View

2.
Matsumoto M . [Inhibitors for protein tyrosine kinases, erbstatin, genistein and herbimycin A, induce differentiation of human neural tumor cell lines]. Nihon Geka Hokan. 1991; 60(2):113-21. View

3.
Tan N, Shaw N, Vinckenbosch N, Liu P, Yasmin R, Desvergne B . Selective cooperation between fatty acid binding proteins and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors in regulating transcription. Mol Cell Biol. 2002; 22(14):5114-27. PMC: 139777. DOI: 10.1128/MCB.22.14.5114-5127.2002. View

4.
Gupta S, Pramanik D, Mukherjee R, Campbell N, Elumalai S, de Wilde R . Molecular determinants of retinoic acid sensitivity in pancreatic cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2011; 18(1):280-9. PMC: 3251696. DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-2165. View

5.
de Bont J, Packer R, Michiels E, den Boer M, Pieters R . Biological background of pediatric medulloblastoma and ependymoma: a review from a translational research perspective. Neuro Oncol. 2008; 10(6):1040-60. PMC: 2719002. DOI: 10.1215/15228517-2008-059. View