» Articles » PMID: 35537033

Media Use During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Cross-sectional Study

Overview
Publisher JMIR Publications
Date 2022 May 10
PMID 35537033
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Throughout the pandemic, the general population was encouraged to use media to be kept informed about sanitary measures while staying connected with others to obtain social support. However, due to mixed findings in the literature, it is not clear whether media use in such a context would be pathogenic or salutogenic.

Objective: Therefore, the associations between COVID-19-related stressors and frequency of media use for information-seeking on trauma- and stressor-related (TSR) symptoms were examined while also investigating how social media use for support-seeking and peritraumatic distress interact with those variables.

Methods: A path model was tested in a sample of 5913 adults who completed an online survey.

Results: The number of COVID-19-related stressors (β=.25; P<.001) and extent of information-seeking through media (β=.24; P=.006) were significantly associated with the severity of TSR symptoms in bivariate comparisons. Associations between levels of peritraumatic distress and both COVID-19-related stressors and information-seeking through media, and social media use for support- and information-seeking through media were found (β=.49, P<.001; β=.70, P<.001; β=.04, P<.001).

Conclusions: Results suggest that exposure to COVID-19-related stressors and seeking COVID-19-related information through the media are associated with higher levels of peritraumatic distress that, in turn, lead to higher levels of TSR symptoms. Although exposure to the stress of the COVID-19 pandemic may be unavoidable, the frequency of COVID-19-related information consumption through various media should be approached with caution.

Citing Articles

Development and validation of the Environmental Confinement Stressors Scale (ECSS-20).

Santibanez-Palma J, Ferrer-Urbina R, Sepulveda-Paez G, Bravo de la Fuente J, Alarcon-Castillo K Front Psychol. 2024; 15:1386235.

PMID: 39077211 PMC: 11284619. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1386235.

References
1.
Thoresen S, Tambs K, Hussain A, Heir T, Johansen V, Bisson J . Brief measure of posttraumatic stress reactions: impact of Event Scale-6. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2009; 45(3):405-12. DOI: 10.1007/s00127-009-0073-x. View

2.
Chao M, Xue D, Liu T, Yang H, Hall B . Media use and acute psychological outcomes during COVID-19 outbreak in China. J Anxiety Disord. 2020; 74:102248. PMC: 7255752. DOI: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2020.102248. View

3.
Thomas D, Jang S, Scandlyn J . The CHASMS conceptual model of cascading disasters and social vulnerability: The COVID-19 case example. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct. 2020; 51:101828. PMC: 7467012. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101828. View

4.
Guardia D, Brunet A, Duhamel A, Ducrocq F, Demarty A, Vaiva G . Prediction of trauma-related disorders: a proposed cutoff score for the peritraumatic distress inventory. Prim Care Companion CNS Disord. 2013; 15(1). PMC: 3661323. DOI: 10.4088/PCC.12l01406. View

5.
Ahern J, Galea S, Resnick H, Kilpatrick D, Bucuvalas M, Gold J . Television images and psychological symptoms after the September 11 terrorist attacks. Psychiatry. 2003; 65(4):289-300. DOI: 10.1521/psyc.65.4.289.20240. View