» Articles » PMID: 35536348

Radiographic Imaging Modalities for Perinatal Brachial Plexus Palsy: a Systematic Review

Overview
Specialty Pediatrics
Date 2022 May 10
PMID 35536348
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Perinatal brachial plexus palsy (PBPP) has a wide spectrum of clinical symptoms that can range from incomplete paresis of the affected extremity to flaccid arm paralysis. Although there is a high rate of spontaneous recovery within the first two years of life, it remains challenging to determine which patients will benefit most from surgical intervention. The diagnostic and predictive use of various imaging modalities has been described in the literature, but there is little consensus on approach or algorithm. The anatomic, pathophysiological, and neurodevelopmental characteristics of the neonatal and infant patient population affected by PBPP necessitate thoughtful consideration prior to selecting an imaging modality.

Methods: A systematic review was conducted using six databases. Two reviewers independently screened articles published through October 2021.

Results: Literature search produced 10,329 publications, and 22 articles were included in the final analysis. These studies included 479 patients. Mean age at time of imaging ranged from 2.1 to 12.8 months and investigated imaging modalities included MRI (18 studies), ultrasound (4 studies), CT myelography (4 studies), and X-ray myelography (1 study). Imaging outcomes were compared against surgical findings (16 studies) or clinical examination (6 studies), and 87.5% of patients underwent surgery.

Conclusion: This systematic review addresses the relative strengths and challenges of common radiologic imaging options. MRI is the most sensitive and specific for identifying preganglionic nerve injuries such as pseudomeningoceles and rootlet avulsion, the latter of which has the poorest prognosis in this patient population and often dictates the need for surgical intervention.

Citing Articles

Diagnostic accuracy of MRI for detecting nerve injury in brachial plexus birth injury.

Brooks J, Hardie C, Wade R, Teh I, Bourke G Br J Radiol. 2024; 98(1165):36-44.

PMID: 39432686 PMC: 11652713. DOI: 10.1093/bjr/tqae214.

References
1.
Evans-Jones G, Kay S, Weindling A, Cranny G, Ward A, Bradshaw A . Congenital brachial palsy: incidence, causes, and outcome in the United Kingdom and Republic of Ireland. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2003; 88(3):F185-9. PMC: 1721533. DOI: 10.1136/fn.88.3.f185. View

2.
Gonen R, Bader D, Ajami M . Effects of a policy of elective cesarean delivery in cases of suspected fetal macrosomia on the incidence of brachial plexus injury and the rate of cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000; 183(5):1296-300. DOI: 10.1067/mob.2000.107382. View

3.
Zuarez-Easton S, Zafran N, Garmi G, Nachum Z, Salim R . Are there modifiable risk factors that may predict the occurrence of brachial plexus injury?. J Perinatol. 2014; 35(5):349-52. DOI: 10.1038/jp.2014.215. View

4.
Gilbert A, Tassin J . [Surgical repair of the brachial plexus in obstetric paralysis]. Chirurgie. 1984; 110(1):70-5. View

5.
Pondaag W, Malessy M, Van Dijk J, Thomeer R . Natural history of obstetric brachial plexus palsy: a systematic review. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2004; 46(2):138-44. DOI: 10.1017/s0012162204000258. View