» Articles » PMID: 35535897

Effects of Paired Associative Magnetic Stimulation Between Nerve Root and Cortex on Motor Function of Lower Limbs After Spinal Cord Injury: Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial

Overview
Date 2022 May 10
PMID 35535897
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Classic paired associative stimulation can improve synaptic plasticity, as demonstrated by animal experiments and human clinical trials in spinal cord injury patients. Paired associative magnetic stimulation (dual-target peripheral and central magnetic stimulation) has been shown to promote neurologic recovery after stroke. However, it remains unclear whether paired associative magnetic stimulation can promote recovery of lower limb motor dysfunction after spinal cord injury. We hypothesize that the current caused by central and peripheral magnetic stimulation will converge at the synapse, which will promote synapse function and improve the motor function of the relevant muscles. Therefore, this study aimed to examine the effects of paired associative magnetic stimulation on neural circuit activation by measuring changes in motor evoked and somatosensory evoked potentials, motor and sensory function of the lower limbs, functional health and activities of daily living, and depression in patients with spinal cord injury. We will recruit 110 thoracic spinal trauma patients treated in the Department of Spinal Cord Injury, China Rehabilitation Hospital and randomly assign them to experimental and control groups in a 1:1 ratio. The trial group (n = 55) will be treated with paired associative magnetic stimulation and conventional rehabilitation treatment. The control group (n = 55) will be treated with sham stimulation and conventional rehabilitation treatment. Outcomes will be measured at four time points: baseline and 4, 12, and 24 weeks after the start of intervention (active or sham paired associative magnetic stimulation). The primary outcome measure of this trial is change in lower limb American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale motor function score from baseline to last follow-up. Secondary outcome measures include changes in lower limb American Spinal Injury Association sensory function score, motor evoked potentials, sensory evoked potentials, modified Ashworth scale score, Maslach Burnout Inventory score, and Hamilton Depression Scale score over time. Motor evoked potential latency reflects corticospinal tract transmission time, while amplitude reflects recruitment ability; both measures can help elucidate the mechanism underlying the effect of paired associative magnetic stimulation on synaptic efficiency. Adverse events will be recorded. Findings from this trial will help to indicate whether paired associative magnetic stimulation (1) promotes recovery of lower limb sensory and motor function, reduces spasticity, and improves quality of life; (2) promotes neurologic recovery by increasing excitability of spinal cord motor neurons and stimulating synaptic plasticity; and (3) improves rehabilitation outcome in patients with spinal cord injury. Recruitment for this trial began in April 2021 and is currently ongoing. It was approved by the Ethics Committee of Yangzhi Affiliated Rehabilitation Hospital of Tongji University, China (approval No. YZ2020-018) on May 18, 2020. The study protocol was registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (registration number: ChiCTR2100044794) on March 27, 2021 (protocol version 1.0). This trial will be completed in April 2022.

Citing Articles

Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for the Treatment of Spinal Cord Injury: Current Status and Perspective.

Fan S, Wang W, Zheng X Int J Mol Sci. 2025; 26(2).

PMID: 39859537 PMC: 11766194. DOI: 10.3390/ijms26020825.


Repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation combined with transcranial magnetic stimulation in rehabilitation of upper extremity hemiparesis following stroke: a pilot study.

Liang S, Wang W, Yu F, Pan L, Xu D, Hu R J Rehabil Med. 2024; 56:jrm19449.

PMID: 38298134 PMC: 10847975. DOI: 10.2340/jrm.v56.19449.


High-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation promotes neural stem cell proliferation after ischemic stroke.

Luo J, Feng Y, Hong Z, Yin M, Zheng H, Zhang L Neural Regen Res. 2023; 19(8):1772-1780.

PMID: 38103244 PMC: 10960276. DOI: 10.4103/1673-5374.389303.


Visualizing Wallerian degeneration in the corticospinal tract after sensorimotor cortex ischemia in mice.

Mu J, Hao L, Wang Z, Fu X, Li Y, Hao F Neural Regen Res. 2023; 19(3):636-641.

PMID: 37721295 PMC: 10581571. DOI: 10.4103/1673-5374.380903.


Research progress on the application of transcranial magnetic stimulation in spinal cord injury rehabilitation: a narrative review.

Wang Y, Dong T, Li X, Zhao H, Yang L, Xu R Front Neurol. 2023; 14:1219590.

PMID: 37533475 PMC: 10392830. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1219590.


References
1.
Krause P, Foerderreuther S, Straube A . Effects of conditioning peripheral repetitive magnetic stimulation in patients with complex regional pain syndrome. Neurol Res. 2005; 27(4):412-7. DOI: 10.1179/016164105X17224. View

2.
Rothwell J, Hallett M, Berardelli A, Eisen A, Rossini P, Paulus W . Magnetic stimulation: motor evoked potentials. The International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol Suppl. 1999; 52:97-103. View

3.
Zschorlich V, Hillebrecht M, Tanjour T, Qi F, Behrendt F, Kirschstein T . Repetitive Peripheral Magnetic Nerve Stimulation (rPMS) as Adjuvant Therapy Reduces Skeletal Muscle Reflex Activity. Front Neurol. 2019; 10:930. PMC: 6718706. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2019.00930. View

4.
George M, Lisanby S, Sackeim H . Transcranial magnetic stimulation: applications in neuropsychiatry. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1999; 56(4):300-11. DOI: 10.1001/archpsyc.56.4.300. View

5.
Kuppuswamy A, Balasubramaniam A, Maksimovic R, Mathias C, Gall A, Craggs M . Action of 5 Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on sensory, motor and autonomic function in human spinal cord injury. Clin Neurophysiol. 2011; 122(12):2452-61. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2011.04.022. View