» Articles » PMID: 35535036

The Impact of Lockdown, Patient Classification, and the Large-Scale Case Screening on the Spread of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) in Hubei

Overview
Journal Biomed Res Int
Publisher Wiley
Date 2022 May 10
PMID 35535036
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The coronavirus disease (COVID-19) which emerged in Wuhan, China, in December 2019, is widely controlled now in China. However, the global epidemic is still severe. To study and comment on Hubei's approaches for responding to the disease, the paper considered some factors such as suspected cases (part of them are influenza patients or common pneumonia patients, etc.), quarantine, patient classification (three types), clinically diagnosed cases, and lockdown of Wuhan and Hubei. After that, the paper established an model based on the surveillance data of Hubei published by the Hubei Health Commission from 10 January 2020 to 30 April 2020 and used the fminsearch optimization method to estimate the optimal parameters of the model. We obtained the basic reproduction number = 3.1571 from 10 to 22 January. was calculated as 2.0471 from 23 to 27 January. From 28 January to 30 April, = 1.5014. Through analysis, it is not hard to find that the patients without classification during the period of confirmed cases will result in the cumulative number of cases in Hubei to increase. In addition, regarding the lockdown measures implemented by Hubei during the epidemic, our simulations also show that if the lockdown time of either Hubei or Wuhan is advanced, it will effectively curb the spread of the epidemic. If the lockdown measures are not taken, the total cumulative number of cases will increase substantially. From the results of the study, it can be concluded that the lockdown, patient classification, and the large-scale case screening are essential to slow the spread of COVID-19, which can provide references for other countries or regions.

Citing Articles

Forecast for peak infections in the second wave of the Omicron after the adjustment of zero-COVID policy in the mainland of China.

Wang S, Wu Y, Li L, Li Y, Sun G Infect Dis Model. 2023; 8(2):562-573.

PMID: 37305609 PMC: 10251123. DOI: 10.1016/j.idm.2023.05.007.


Quantitative evaluation of the role of Fangcang shelter hospitals in the control of Omicron transmission: A case study of the outbreak in Shanghai, China in 2022.

Wang S, Li L, Zhang J, Li Y, Luo X, Sun G One Health. 2023; 16:100475.

PMID: 36593980 PMC: 9803829. DOI: 10.1016/j.onehlt.2022.100475.

References
1.
Wang K, Lu Z, Wang X, Li H, Li H, Lin D . Current trends and future prediction of novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) epidemic in China: a dynamical modeling analysis. Math Biosci Eng. 2020; 17(4):3052-3061. DOI: 10.3934/mbe.2020173. View

2.
Zhang B, Zhou H, Zhou F . Study on SARS-CoV-2 transmission and the effects of control measures in China. PLoS One. 2020; 15(11):e0242649. PMC: 7709801. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0242649. View

3.
Diekmann O, Heesterbeek J, Metz J . On the definition and the computation of the basic reproduction ratio R0 in models for infectious diseases in heterogeneous populations. J Math Biol. 1990; 28(4):365-82. DOI: 10.1007/BF00178324. View

4.
Chowell G, Fenimore P, Castillo-Garsow M, Castillo-Chavez C . SARS outbreaks in Ontario, Hong Kong and Singapore: the role of diagnosis and isolation as a control mechanism. J Theor Biol. 2003; 224(1):1-8. PMC: 7134599. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5193(03)00228-5. View

5.
Guo X, Zhang H, Zeng Y . Transmissibility of COVID-19 in 11 major cities in China and its association with temperature and humidity in Beijing, Shanghai, Guangzhou, and Chengdu. Infect Dis Poverty. 2020; 9(1):87. PMC: 7348130. DOI: 10.1186/s40249-020-00708-0. View