Experimental Validation of a Voxel-based Finite Element Model Simulating Femoroplasty of Lytic Lesions in the Proximal Femur

Overview

Journal Sci Rep

Specialty Science

Date 2022 May 9

PMID 35534595

Authors

Amelie Sas

An Sermon

G Harry van Lenthe

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Femoroplasty is a procedure where bone cement is injected percutaneously into a weakened proximal femur. Uncertainty exists whether femoroplasty provides sufficient mechanical strengthening to prevent fractures in patients with femoral bone metastases. Finite element models are promising tools to evaluate the mechanical effectiveness of femoroplasty, but a thorough validation is required. This study validated a voxel-based finite element model against experimental data from eight pairs of human cadaver femurs with artificial metastatic lesions. One femur from each pair was left untreated, while the contralateral femur was augmented with bone cement. Finite element models accurately predicted the femoral strength in the defect (R = 0.96) and augmented (R = 0.93) femurs. The modelled surface strain distributions showed a good qualitative match with results from digital image correlation; yet, quantitatively, only moderate correlation coefficients were found for the defect (mean R = 0.78) and augmented (mean R = 0.76) femurs. This was attributed to the presence of vessel holes in the femurs and the jagged surface representation of our voxel-based models. Despite some inaccuracies in the surface measurements, the FE models accurately predicted the global bone strength and qualitative deformation behavior, both before and after femoroplasty. Hence, they can offer a useful biomechanical tool to assist clinicians in assessing the need for prophylactic augmentation in patients with metastatic bone disease, as well as in identifying suitable patients for femoroplasty.

Citing Articles

Mechanical Gains Associated With Virtual Prophylactic Intramedullary Nail Fixation in Femurs With Metastatic Disease.

Johnson J, Figueroa A, Brouillette M, Miller B, Goetz J Iowa Orthop J. 2024; 43(2):70-78.

PMID: 38213856 PMC: 10777699.

References

Groning F, Liu J, Fagan M, OHiggins P . Validating a voxel-based finite element model of a human mandible using digital speckle pattern interferometry. J Biomech. 2009; 42(9):1224-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.03.025. View

Philipp T, Mikula J, Doung Y, Gundle K . Is There an Association Between Prophylactic Femur Stabilization and Survival in Patients with Metastatic Bone Disease?. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2020; 478(3):540-546. PMC: 7145091. DOI: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000803. View

Katz Y, Yosibash Z . New insights on the proximal femur biomechanics using Digital Image Correlation. J Biomech. 2020; 101:109599. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2020.109599. View

Faulkner K, Gluer C, Grampp S, Genant H . Cross-calibration of liquid and solid QCT calibration standards: corrections to the UCSF normative data. Osteoporos Int. 1993; 3(1):36-42. DOI: 10.1007/BF01623175. View

Eggermont F, van der Wal G, Westhoff P, Laar A, de Jong M, Rozema T . Patient-specific finite element computer models improve fracture risk assessments in cancer patients with femoral bone metastases compared to clinical guidelines. Bone. 2019; 130:115101. DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2019.115101. View

Deschamps F, Farouil G, Hakime A, Barah A, Guiu B, Teriitehau C . Cementoplasty of metastases of the proximal femur: is it a safe palliative option?. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2012; 23(10):1311-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2012.06.027. View

Kaneko T, Skinner H, Keyak J . Feasibility of a percutaneous technique for repairing proximal femora with simulated metastatic lesions. Med Eng Phys. 2006; 29(5):594-601. DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2006.06.008. View

Sas A, Helgason B, Ferguson S, van Lenthe G . Mechanical and morphological characterization of PMMA/bone composites in human femoral heads. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2020; 115:104247. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.104247. View

Goodheart J, Cleary R, Damron T, Mann K . Simulating activities of daily living with finite element analysis improves fracture prediction for patients with metastatic femoral lesions. J Orthop Res. 2015; 33(8):1226-34. DOI: 10.1002/jor.22887. View

10.

Kaneko T, Skinner H, Keyak J . Lytic lesions in the femoral neck: Importance of location and evaluation of a novel minimally invasive repair technique. J Orthop Res. 2008; 26(8):1127-32. DOI: 10.1002/jor.20555. View

11.

Varga P, Hofmann-Fliri L, Blauth M, Windolf M . Prophylactic augmentation of the osteoporotic proximal femur-mission impossible?. Bonekey Rep. 2016; 5:854. PMC: 5141600. DOI: 10.1038/bonekey.2016.86. View

12.

Basafa E, Armiger R, Kutzer M, Belkoff S, Mears S, Armand M . Patient-specific finite element modeling for femoral bone augmentation. Med Eng Phys. 2013; 35(6):860-5. PMC: 4476497. DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2013.01.003. View

13.

Keyak J, Kaneko T, Tehranzadeh J, Skinner H . Predicting proximal femoral strength using structural engineering models. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005; (437):219-28. DOI: 10.1097/01.blo.0000164400.37905.22. View

14.

Dickinson A, Taylor A, Ozturk H, Browne M . Experimental validation of a finite element model of the proximal femur using digital image correlation and a composite bone model. J Biomech Eng. 2010; 133(1):014504. DOI: 10.1115/1.4003129. View

15.

Grassi L, Isaksson H . Extracting accurate strain measurements in bone mechanics: A critical review of current methods. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2015; 50:43-54. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.06.006. View

16.

Grassi L, Kok J, Gustafsson A, Zheng Y, Vaananen S, Jurvelin J . Elucidating failure mechanisms in human femurs during a fall to the side using bilateral digital image correlation. J Biomech. 2020; 106:109826. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2020.109826. View

17.

Kok J, Grassi L, Gustafsson A, Isaksson H . Femoral strength and strains in sideways fall: Validation of finite element models against bilateral strain measurements. J Biomech. 2021; 122:110445. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2021.110445. View

18.

Feng H, Wang J, Guo P, Xu J, Chen W, Zhang Y . CT-Guided Percutaneous Femoroplasty (PFP) for the Treatment of Proximal Femoral Metastases. Pain Physician. 2016; 19(5):E767-73. View

19.

Sas A, Ohs N, Tanck E, van Lenthe G . Nonlinear voxel-based finite element model for strength assessment of healthy and metastatic proximal femurs. Bone Rep. 2020; 12:100263. PMC: 7163060. DOI: 10.1016/j.bonr.2020.100263. View

20.

Helgason B, Gilchrist S, Ariza O, Chak J, Zheng G, Widmer R . Development of a balanced experimental-computational approach to understanding the mechanics of proximal femur fractures. Med Eng Phys. 2014; 36(6):793-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2014.02.019. View