» Articles » PMID: 35534451

Larger Remaining Stomach Volume Is Associated With Better Nutrition and Muscle Preservation in Patients With Gastric Cancer Receiving Distal Gastrectomy With Gastroduodenostomy

Overview
Date 2022 May 9
PMID 35534451
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Weight loss and deterioration in body composition are observed in patients with gastric cancer (GC) following gastrectomy. This study aimed to investigate the impact of residual stomach volume (RSV) on the nutritional status and body composition of patients with GC treated with distal gastrectomy.

Materials And Methods: In total, 227 patients who underwent minimally invasive distal gastrectomy with Billroth 1 anastomosis for stage I GC between February 2015 and May 2018 were enrolled. Clinicodemographic and laboratory data were collected from the GC registry. The RSV, abdominal muscle area, and subcutaneous/visceral fat areas were measured using computed tomography data.

Results: A larger RSV was associated with a lower decrease in the nutritional risk index (P=0.004) and hemoglobin level (P=0.003) during the first 3 months after surgery, and better recovery at 12 months. A larger RSV demonstrated an advantage in the preservation of abdominal muscle area (P=0.02) and visceral fat (P=0.04) after surgery, as well as less reduction in weight (P=0.02) and body mass index (P=0.03).

Conclusions: Larger RSV was associated with improved nutritional status and better preservation of muscle and fat after distal gastrectomy.

Citing Articles

Impact of Olfactory Change on Postoperative Body Weight Loss in Patients with Gastric Cancer after Gastrectomy.

Matsuo H, Matsui R, Kumagai K, Ida S, Saino Y, Fujihara A Nutrients. 2024; 16(6).

PMID: 38542761 PMC: 10975133. DOI: 10.3390/nu16060851.


Artificial Intelligence in Gastric Cancer Imaging With Emphasis on Diagnostic Imaging and Body Morphometry.

Kim K, Huh J, Urooj B, Lee J, Lee J, Lee I J Gastric Cancer. 2023; 23(3):388-399.

PMID: 37553127 PMC: 10412978. DOI: 10.5230/jgc.2023.23.e30.

References
1.
. Korean Practice Guideline for Gastric Cancer 2018: an Evidence-based, Multi-disciplinary Approach. J Gastric Cancer. 2019; 19(1):1-48. PMC: 6441770. DOI: 10.5230/jgc.2019.19.e8. View

2.
Nomura E, Lee S, Tokuhara T, Nitta T, Kawai M, Uchiyama K . Functional outcomes according to the size of the gastric remnant and the type of reconstruction following distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: an investigation including total gastrectomy. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2013; 43(12):1195-202. DOI: 10.1093/jjco/hyt141. View

3.
Farrell C, Brearley S, Pilling M, Molassiotis A . The impact of chemotherapy-related nausea on patients' nutritional status, psychological distress and quality of life. Support Care Cancer. 2012; 21(1):59-66. DOI: 10.1007/s00520-012-1493-9. View

4.
Heneghan H, Zaborowski A, Fanning M, McHugh A, Doyle S, Moore J . Prospective Study of Malabsorption and Malnutrition After Esophageal and Gastric Cancer Surgery. Ann Surg. 2015; 262(5):803-7. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001445. View

5.
Yamashita M, Kamiya K, Matsunaga A, Kitamura T, Hamazaki N, Matsuzawa R . Prognostic value of sarcopenic obesity estimated by computed tomography in patients with cardiovascular disease and undergoing surgery. J Cardiol. 2019; 74(3):273-278. DOI: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2019.02.010. View