» Articles » PMID: 35534067

Development of 'Core Outcome Sets' for Meningioma in Clinical Studies (The COSMIC Project): Protocol for Two Systematic Literature Reviews, EDelphi Surveys and Online Consensus Meetings

Abstract

Introduction: Meningioma is the most common primary intracranial tumour in adults. The majority are non-malignant, but a proportion behave more aggressively. Incidental/minimally symptomatic meningioma are often managed by serial imaging. Symptomatic meningioma, those that threaten neurovascular structures, or demonstrate radiological growth, are usually resected as first-line management strategy. For patients in poor clinical condition, or with inoperable, residual or recurrent disease, radiotherapy is often used as primary or adjuvant treatment. Effective pharmacotherapy treatments do not currently exist. There is heterogeneity in the outcomes measured and reported in meningioma clinical studies. Two 'Core Outcome Sets' (COS) will be developed: (COSMIC: Intervention) for use in meningioma clinical effectiveness trials and (COSMIC: Observation) for use in clinical studies of incidental/untreated meningioma.

Methods And Analysis: Two systematic literature reviews and trial registry searches will identify outcomes measured and reported in published and ongoing (1) meningioma clinical effectiveness trials, and (2) clinical studies of incidental/untreated meningioma. Outcomes include those that are clinician reported, patient reported, caregiver reported and based on objective tests (eg, neurocognitive tests), as well as measures of progression and survival. Outcomes will be deduplicated and categorised to generate two long lists. The two long lists will be prioritised through two, two-round, international, modified eDelphi surveys including patients with meningioma, healthcare professionals, researchers and those in caring/supporting roles. The two final COS will be ratified through two 1-day online consensus meetings, with representation from all stakeholder groups.

Ethics And Dissemination: Institutional review board (University of Liverpool) approval was obtained for the conduct of this study. Participant eConsent will be obtained prior to participation in the eDelphi surveys and consensus meetings. The two systematic literature reviews and two final COS will be published and freely available.

Trial Registration Number: COMET study ID 1508.

Citing Articles

Health-related quality-of-life outcomes in CNS WHO grade 2 and 3 meningioma: a systematic review.

Cook W, Khalil F, Gillespie C, Helmy A Neurosurg Rev. 2025; 48(1):268.

PMID: 40011234 PMC: 11865157. DOI: 10.1007/s10143-025-03420-5.


How Delphi studies in the health sciences find consensus: a scoping review.

Schifano J, Niederberger M Syst Rev. 2025; 14(1):14.

PMID: 39810238 PMC: 11734368. DOI: 10.1186/s13643-024-02738-3.


Meningioma: International Consortium on Meningiomas consensus review on scientific advances and treatment paradigms for clinicians, researchers, and patients.

Wang J, Landry A, Raleigh D, Sahm F, Walsh K, Goldbrunner R Neuro Oncol. 2024; 26(10):1742-1780.

PMID: 38695575 PMC: 11449035. DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noae082.


The outcomes measured and reported in intracranial meningioma clinical trials: A systematic review.

Millward C, Keshwara S, Armstrong T, Barrington H, Bell S, Brodbelt A Neurooncol Adv. 2024; 6(1):vdae030.

PMID: 38596717 PMC: 11003530. DOI: 10.1093/noajnl/vdae030.


The outcomes measured and reported in observational studies of incidental and untreated intracranial meningioma: A systematic review.

Millward C, Islim A, Armstrong T, Barrington H, Bell S, Brodbelt A Neurooncol Adv. 2024; 6(1):vdae042.

PMID: 38596715 PMC: 11003528. DOI: 10.1093/noajnl/vdae042.


References
1.
Goldbrunner R, Minniti G, Preusser M, Jenkinson M, Sallabanda K, Houdart E . EANO guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of meningiomas. Lancet Oncol. 2016; 17(9):e383-91. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(16)30321-7. View

2.
Goldbrunner R, Stavrinou P, Jenkinson M, Sahm F, Mawrin C, Weber D . EANO guideline on the diagnosis and management of meningiomas. Neuro Oncol. 2021; 23(11):1821-1834. PMC: 8563316. DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noab150. View

3.
Williamson P, Altman D, Blazeby J, Clarke M, Devane D, Gargon E . Developing core outcome sets for clinical trials: issues to consider. Trials. 2012; 13:132. PMC: 3472231. DOI: 10.1186/1745-6215-13-132. View

4.
Sinha I, Smyth R, Williamson P . Using the Delphi technique to determine which outcomes to measure in clinical trials: recommendations for the future based on a systematic review of existing studies. PLoS Med. 2011; 8(1):e1000393. PMC: 3026691. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000393. View

5.
Page M, McKenzie J, Bossuyt P, Boutron I, Hoffmann T, Mulrow C . The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021; 372:n71. PMC: 8005924. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.n71. View