» Articles » PMID: 3553227

Cellular and Humoral Immune Response to a Phenolic Glycolipid Antigen (PhenGL-I) in Patients with Leprosy

Overview
Specialty Microbiology
Date 1987 Mar 1
PMID 3553227
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The ability of phenolic glycolipid I (PhenGL-I) of Mycobacterium leprae to stimulate in vitro lymphocyte proliferation (LP) was tested in cultures of peripheral blood cells from 42 patients with leprosy in Chicago and Thailand, 9 individuals with household contact in Thailand, and 10 unexposed North American controls. Only 10 responders (24%) were found among the patients, and the degree of LP was small. Responders were found among patients with lepromatous (18%) or tuberculoid (30%) leprosy without relation to age, complications, duration of treatment, or lepromin responsiveness. The specificity of the response was supported by a lack of response to two other glycolipids, by responses by T cells but not B cells, and by the observation that three of four responders tested maintained their responses to PhenGL-I for at least 1 year. Serum immunoglobulin M (IgM) and IgG antibodies were measured in the same patients by using PhenGL-I or its terminal monosaccharide conjugated to a bovine serum albumin carrier in an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. The presence of IgM antibody correlated negatively with LP to lepromin and to PhenGL-I in patients with tuberculoid leprosy. We conclude that circulating T cells from some leprosy patients proliferate in the presence of PhenGL-I in vitro, but the response is weak, possibly due to concomitant suppression or inhibition. The predominance of IgM antibody to PhenGL-I may be related to a lack of a T-helper-cell-mediated switch to IgG antibody response.

Citing Articles

Phenolic-glycolipid-1 and lipoarabinomannan preferentially modulate TCR- and CD28-triggered proximal biochemical events, leading to T-cell unresponsiveness in mycobacterial diseases.

Dagur P, Sharma B, Upadhyay R, Dua B, Rizvi A, Khan N Lipids Health Dis. 2012; 11:119.

PMID: 22985026 PMC: 3477116. DOI: 10.1186/1476-511X-11-119.


On cell signalling mechanism of Mycobacterium leprae soluble antigen (MLSA) in Jurkat T cells.

Joshi B, Khedouci S, Dagur P, Hichami A, Sengupta U, Khan N Mol Cell Biochem. 2006; 287(1-2):157-64.

PMID: 16583135 DOI: 10.1007/s11010-006-9132-8.


Immunohistological analysis of in situ expression of mycobacterial antigens in skin lesions of leprosy patients across the histopathological spectrum. Association of Mycobacterial lipoarabinomannan (LAM) and Mycobacterium leprae phenolic....

Verhagen C, Faber W, Klatser P, Buffing A, Naafs B, Das P Am J Pathol. 1999; 154(6):1793-804.

PMID: 10362804 PMC: 3277205. DOI: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)65435-1.


Use of serum antibody and lysozyme levels for diagnosis of leprosy and tuberculosis.

Near K, LEFFORD M J Clin Microbiol. 1992; 30(5):1105-10.

PMID: 1583106 PMC: 265233. DOI: 10.1128/jcm.30.5.1105-1110.1992.

References
1.
Gillis T, Miller R, Young D, Khanolkar S, Buchanan T . Immunochemical characterization of a protein associated with Mycobacterium leprae cell wall. Infect Immun. 1985; 49(2):371-7. PMC: 262025. DOI: 10.1128/iai.49.2.371-377.1985. View

2.
Cebra J, Komisar J, Schweitzer P . CH isotype 'switching' during normal B-lymphocyte development. Annu Rev Immunol. 1984; 2:493-548. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.iy.02.040184.002425. View

3.
Goodman J, Sercarz E . The complexity of structures involved in T-cell activation. Annu Rev Immunol. 1983; 1:465-98. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.iy.01.040183.002341. View

4.
Koster F, Teuscher C, Matzner P, Umland E, Yanagihara D, Brennan P . Strain variations in the murine cellular immune response to the phenolic glycolipid I antigen of Mycobacterium leprae. Infect Immun. 1986; 51(2):495-500. PMC: 262362. DOI: 10.1128/iai.51.2.495-500.1986. View

5.
RIDLEY D, Jopling W . Classification of leprosy according to immunity. A five-group system. Int J Lepr Other Mycobact Dis. 1966; 34(3):255-73. View