Evolution of the World Health Organization Semen Analysis Manual: Where Are We?

Overview

Journal Nat Rev Urol

Specialty Urology

Date 2022 May 6

PMID 35523961

Authors

Sandro C Esteves

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

The WHO (World Health Organization) manuals provide state-of-the-art guidance on how a semen analysis should be carried out. The much anticipated sixth edition of the WHO semen analysis manual has been released 10 years after its previous version and includes essential updates, such as new reference standards for semen volume and microscopic sperm characteristics of recent fathers. A well-conducted semen analysis remains an essential foundation of the infertility evaluation process and affects patient referral, diagnosis and treatment. However, a male infertility work-up primarily based on routine semen analysis does not provide men with an optimal fertility pathway; the primary reasons for routine semen analysis inadequacy in this context include its low predictive value for natural and assisted conception success, its inability to detect sperm DNA and epigenetic deficiencies that might negatively affect embryo development, implantation and offspring well-being, and the substantial overlap between semen parameters of fertile and subfertile individuals. Ideally, a full andrological assessment should be carried out by reproductive urologists in all men dealing with couple infertility and should include a detailed history analysis, physical examination, semen analysis, endocrine assessment and other tests as needed. Only through a complete male infertility work-up will relevant underlying medical and infertility conditions be revealed and potentially treated or alleviated. The ultimate goals of a comprehensive andrological assessment are to positively influence overall male health, pregnancy prospects and offspring well-being.

Citing Articles

Microplastic exposure is associated with male reproductive health.

Liu W, Qu Z, Wang X, Feng H, Ma S, Zheng Y Med Rev (2021). 2024; 4(6):549-552.

PMID: 39664079 PMC: 11629307. DOI: 10.1515/mr-2024-0069.

From Double Helix to Double Trouble: Sperm DNA Fragmentation Unveiled - A Reproductive Urologist Perspective (AUA Bruce Stewart Memorial Lecture - ASRM 2024).

Esteves S Int Braz J Urol. 2024; 51(1).

PMID: 39556852 PMC: 11869925. DOI: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2024.9924.

Kidney disease and reproductive health.

Smith P, Sarris I, Clark K, Wiles K, Bramham K Nat Rev Nephrol. 2024; 21(2):127-143.

PMID: 39501029 DOI: 10.1038/s41581-024-00901-6.

Non-Obstructive Azoospermia and Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection: Unveiling the Chances of Success and Possible Consequences for Offspring.

Majzoub A, Viana M, Achermann A, Ferreira I, Laursen R, Humaidan P J Clin Med. 2024; 13(16).

PMID: 39201081 PMC: 11355217. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13164939.

From pathophysiology to practice: addressing oxidative stress and sperm DNA fragmentation in Varicocele-affected subfertile men.

Neto F, Campos L, Roque M, Esteves S Int Braz J Urol. 2024; 50(5):530-560.

PMID: 39106113 PMC: 11446552. DOI: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2024.9917.

References

Esteves S . Clinical relevance of routine semen analysis and controversies surrounding the 2010 World Health Organization criteria for semen examination. Int Braz J Urol. 2014; 40(4):443-53. DOI: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2014.04.02. View

Penn H, Windsperger A, Smith Z, Parekattil S, Kuang W, Kolettis P . National semen analysis reference range reporting: adherence to the 1999 World Health Organization guidelines 10 years later. Fertil Steril. 2011; 95(7):2320-3. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.03.004. View

Esteves S, Zini A, Aziz N, Alvarez J, Sabanegh Jr E, Agarwal A . Critical appraisal of World Health Organization's new reference values for human semen characteristics and effect on diagnosis and treatment of subfertile men. Urology. 2011; 79(1):16-22. DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2011.08.003. View

Ford W . Comments on the release of the 5th edition of the WHO Laboratory Manual for the Examination and Processing of Human Semen. Asian J Androl. 2010; 12(1):59-63. PMC: 3739684. DOI: 10.1038/aja.2008.57. View

Cooper T, Noonan E, von Eckardstein S, Auger J, Baker H, Behre H . World Health Organization reference values for human semen characteristics. Hum Reprod Update. 2009; 16(3):231-45. DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dmp048. View

Murray K, James A, McGeady J, Reed M, Kuang W, Nangia A . The effect of the new 2010 World Health Organization criteria for semen analyses on male infertility. Fertil Steril. 2012; 98(6):1428-31. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.07.1130. View

Minhas S, Bettocchi C, Boeri L, Capogrosso P, Carvalho J, Cilesiz N . European Association of Urology Guidelines on Male Sexual and Reproductive Health: 2021 Update on Male Infertility. Eur Urol. 2021; 80(5):603-620. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2021.08.014. View

Schlegel P, Sigman M, Collura B, De Jonge C, Eisenberg M, Lamb D . Diagnosis and treatment of infertility in men: AUA/ASRM guideline part I. Fertil Steril. 2020; 115(1):54-61. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.11.015. View

Barratt C, Bjorndahl L, De Jonge C, Lamb D, Osorio Martini F, McLachlan R . The diagnosis of male infertility: an analysis of the evidence to support the development of global WHO guidance-challenges and future research opportunities. Hum Reprod Update. 2017; 23(6):660-680. PMC: 5850791. DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dmx021. View

10.

Blickenstorfer K, Voelkle M, Xie M, Frohlich A, Imthurn B, Leeners B . Are WHO Recommendations to Perform 2 Consecutive Semen Analyses for Reliable Diagnosis of Male Infertility Still Valid?. J Urol. 2018; 201(4):783-791. DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2018.11.001. View

11.

Chen T, Belladelli F, Del Giudice F, Eisenberg M . Male fertility as a marker for health. Reprod Biomed Online. 2021; 44(1):131-144. DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2021.09.023. View

12.

Esteves S, Zini A, Coward R, Evenson D, Gosalvez J, Lewis S . Sperm DNA fragmentation testing: Summary evidence and clinical practice recommendations. Andrologia. 2020; 53(2):e13874. PMC: 7988559. DOI: 10.1111/and.13874. View

13.

Esteves S, Santi D, Simoni M . An update on clinical and surgical interventions to reduce sperm DNA fragmentation in infertile men. Andrology. 2019; 8(1):53-81. DOI: 10.1111/andr.12724. View

14.

Neto F, Roque M, Esteves S . Effect of varicocelectomy on sperm deoxyribonucleic acid fragmentation rates in infertile men with clinical varicocele: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2021; 116(3):696-712. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2021.04.003. View

15.

Esteves S . Who cares about oligozoospermia when we have ICSI. Reprod Biomed Online. 2022; 44(5):769-775. DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2021.11.026. View

16.

Campbell M, Lotti F, Baldi E, Schlatt S, Festin M, Bjorndahl L . Distribution of semen examination results 2020 - A follow up of data collated for the WHO semen analysis manual 2010. Andrology. 2021; 9(3):817-822. DOI: 10.1111/andr.12983. View

17.

Skakkebaek N, Rajpert-De Meyts E, Buck Louis G, Toppari J, Andersson A, Eisenberg M . Male Reproductive Disorders and Fertility Trends: Influences of Environment and Genetic Susceptibility. Physiol Rev. 2015; 96(1):55-97. PMC: 4698396. DOI: 10.1152/physrev.00017.2015. View

18.

Evgeni E, Lymberopoulos G, Gazouli M, Asimakopoulos B . Conventional semen parameters and DNA fragmentation in relation to fertility status in a Greek population. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2015; 188:17-23. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2015.02.026. View

19.

Tang Y, Tang L, Wang Q, Song G, Jiang Y, Deng S . The reference values for semen parameters of 1213 fertile men in Guangdong Province in China. Asian J Androl. 2014; 17(2):298-303. PMC: 4650483. DOI: 10.4103/1008-682X.143251. View

20.

Glazer C, Li S, Zhang C, Giwercman A, Bonde J, Eisenberg M . Racial and Sociodemographic Differences of Semen Parameters Among US Men Undergoing a Semen Analysis. Urology. 2018; 123:126-132. DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2018.09.029. View