» Articles » PMID: 35522247

Contributions of Fundamental Frequency and Timbre to Vocal Emotion Perception and Their Electrophysiological Correlates

Overview
Date 2022 May 6
PMID 35522247
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Our ability to infer a speaker's emotional state depends on the processing of acoustic parameters such as fundamental frequency (F0) and timbre. Yet, how these parameters are processed and integrated to inform emotion perception remains largely unknown. Here we pursued this issue using a novel parameter-specific voice morphing technique to create stimuli with emotion modulations in only F0 or only timbre. We used these stimuli together with fully modulated vocal stimuli in an event-related potential (ERP) study in which participants listened to and identified stimulus emotion. ERPs (P200 and N400) and behavioral data converged in showing that both F0 and timbre support emotion processing but do so differently for different emotions: Whereas F0 was most relevant for responses to happy, fearful and sad voices, timbre was most relevant for responses to voices expressing pleasure. Together, these findings offer original insights into the relative significance of different acoustic parameters for early neuronal representations of speaker emotion and show that such representations are predictive of subsequent evaluative judgments.

Citing Articles

Electrophysiological Correlates of Vocal Emotional Processing in Musicians and Non-Musicians.

Nussbaum C, Schirmer A, Schweinberger S Brain Sci. 2023; 13(11).

PMID: 38002523 PMC: 10670383. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci13111563.


Neural Correlates of Voice Learning with Distinctive and Non-Distinctive Faces.

Zaske R, Kaufmann J, Schweinberger S Brain Sci. 2023; 13(4).

PMID: 37190602 PMC: 10136676. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci13040637.

References
1.
von Eiff C, Skuk V, Zaske R, Nussbaum C, Fruhholz S, Feuer U . Parameter-Specific Morphing Reveals Contributions of Timbre to the Perception of Vocal Emotions in Cochlear Implant Users. Ear Hear. 2022; 43(4):1178-1188. PMC: 9197138. DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001181. View

2.
Barrett S, Rugg M, Perrett D . Event-related potentials and the matching of familiar and unfamiliar faces. Neuropsychologia. 1988; 26(1):105-17. DOI: 10.1016/0028-3932(88)90034-6. View

3.
Schirmer A, Chen C, Ching A, Tan L, Hong R . Vocal emotions influence verbal memory: neural correlates and interindividual differences. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2012; 13(1):80-93. DOI: 10.3758/s13415-012-0132-8. View

4.
Kayser J, Tenke C . On the benefits of using surface Laplacian (current source density) methodology in electrophysiology. Int J Psychophysiol. 2015; 97(3):171-3. PMC: 4610715. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2015.06.001. View

5.
Bruck C, Kreifelts B, Wildgruber D . Emotional voices in context: a neurobiological model of multimodal affective information processing. Phys Life Rev. 2011; 8(4):383-403. DOI: 10.1016/j.plrev.2011.10.002. View