» Articles » PMID: 35520982

Age Suit Simulation Replicates in Healthy Young Adults the Functional Challenges to Balance Experienced by Older Adults: an Observational Study

Overview
Date 2022 May 6
PMID 35520982
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Age simulation can have a positive effect on empathic understanding and perception of ageing. However, there is limited evidence for its ability to replicate objectively the physical and functional challenges of ageing.

Objective: To observe whether age suit simulation can replicate in healthy young adults the physical and physiological balance disturbance and falls risk experienced by older adults.

Methodology: Healthy young adults aged 20-40 years (16 male) were recruited to the study using convenience sampling from a student population. Participants performed three validated balance tests-Functional Reach Test (FRT), Timed Up and Go (TUG) and Berg Balance Scale (BBS)-first without the age suit and then with the age suit, using a standardised protocol, following the same sequence.

Results: 30 participants completed all tests. Statistically significant differences between without-age-suit and with-age-suit performance were recorded for FRT distance (p<0.000005), time taken to complete the TUG (p<0.0005) and BBS score (p<0.001). A comparison of participant scores with normative FRT and TUG scores identified that the suit had 'aged' the majority of participants to the normative values for older adults (60+), with some reaching the values for individuals aged 70-89. However, no scores achieved the values indicative of increased falls risk.

Conclusions: The age suit is a valid educational tool that extends the value of age simulation beyond a more general empathising role, enabling those working with an older population to experience and understand the functional challenges to balance experienced by older adults as part of their training.

Citing Articles

"It´s like walking in a bubble", nursing students´ perspectives on age suit simulation in a home environment - group interviews from reflection seminars.

Bouwmeester Stjernetun B, Gillsjo C, Odzakovic E, Hallgren J BMC Nurs. 2024; 23(1):124.

PMID: 38365670 PMC: 10870535. DOI: 10.1186/s12912-024-01792-5.


Combining 3D skeleton data and deep convolutional neural network for balance assessment during walking.

Ma X, Zeng B, Xing Y Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2023; 11:1191868.

PMID: 37409167 PMC: 10318186. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1191868.


Effects of age simulation suits on psychological and physical outcomes: a systematic review.

Gerhardy T, Schlomann A, Wahl H, Schmidt L Eur J Ageing. 2022; 19(4):953-976.

PMID: 36506694 PMC: 9729636. DOI: 10.1007/s10433-022-00722-1.

References
1.
Aggarwal R, Mytton O, Derbrew M, Hananel D, Heydenburg M, Issenberg B . Training and simulation for patient safety. Qual Saf Health Care. 2010; 19 Suppl 2:i34-43. DOI: 10.1136/qshc.2009.038562. View

2.
Podsiadlo D, Richardson S . The timed "Up & Go": a test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1991; 39(2):142-8. DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1991.tb01616.x. View

3.
Steffen T, Hacker T, Mollinger L . Age- and gender-related test performance in community-dwelling elderly people: Six-Minute Walk Test, Berg Balance Scale, Timed Up & Go Test, and gait speeds. Phys Ther. 2002; 82(2):128-37. DOI: 10.1093/ptj/82.2.128. View

4.
Rubenstein L . Falls in older people: epidemiology, risk factors and strategies for prevention. Age Ageing. 2006; 35 Suppl 2:ii37-ii41. DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afl084. View

5.
Bennett P, Moore M, Wenham J . The PAUL Suit(©) : an experience of ageing. Clin Teach. 2015; 13(2):107-11. DOI: 10.1111/tct.12410. View