» Articles » PMID: 35519836

Tracking Workflow During High-stakes Resuscitation: the Application of a Novel Clinician Movement Tracing Tool During in Situ Trauma Simulation

Overview
Date 2022 May 6
PMID 35519836
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Clinician movement and workflow analysis provides an opportunity to identify inefficiencies during trauma resuscitation care. Inefficient workflows may represent latent safety threats (LSTs), defined as unrecognised system-based elements that can negatively impact patients. In situ simulation (ISS) can be used to model resuscitation workflows without direct impact on patients. We report the pilot application of a novel, tracing tool to track clinician movement during high-fidelity ISS trauma sessions.

Methods: Twelve unannounced ISSs were conducted. An open source, Windows-based video overlay tracing tool was developed to generate a visual representation of participant movement during ISS. This tracing tool used a manual mouse tracking algorithm to produce point-by-point location information of a selected participant in a video. The tracing tool was applied to video recordings of clinicians performing a cricothyroidotomy during ISS trauma scenarios. A comparative workflow and movement analysis was completed, which included distance travelled and space utilisation. This data was visually represented with time-lapsed movement videos and heat maps.

Results: A fourfold difference in the relative distance travelled was observed between participants who performed a cricothyroidotomy during an ISS trauma resuscitation. Variation in each participant's movement was attributable to three factors: (1) team role assignment and task allocation; (2) knowledge of clinical space: equipment location and path to equipment retrieval; and (3) equipment bundling. This tool facilitated LST identification related to cricothyroidotomy performance.

Conclusion: This novel tracing tool effectively generated a visual representation of participants' workflows and quantified movement during ISS video review. An improved understanding of human movement during ISS trauma resuscitations provides a unique opportunity to augment simulation debriefing, conduct human factor analysis of system elements (eg, tools/technology, physical environment/layout) and foster change management towards efficient workflows.

Citing Articles

Deep Learning Analysis of Surgical Video Recordings to Assess Nontechnical Skills.

Harari R, Dias R, Kennedy-Metz L, Varni G, Gombolay M, Yule S JAMA Netw Open. 2024; 7(7):e2422520.

PMID: 39083274 PMC: 11292454. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.22520.


Measuring teamwork for training in healthcare using eye tracking and pose estimation.

Weiss K, Kolbe M, Lohmeyer Q, Meboldt M Front Psychol. 2023; 14:1169940.

PMID: 37325757 PMC: 10264622. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1169940.


Data-driven resuscitation training using pose estimation.

Weiss K, Kolbe M, Nef A, Grande B, Kalirajan B, Meboldt M Adv Simul (Lond). 2023; 8(1):12.

PMID: 37061746 PMC: 10105636. DOI: 10.1186/s41077-023-00251-6.


Considerations for psychological safety with system-focused debriefings.

Dube M, Kessler D, Huang L, Petrosoniak A, Bajaj K BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn. 2022; 6(3):132-134.

PMID: 35518380 PMC: 8936826. DOI: 10.1136/bmjstel-2019-000579.


Latent safety threat identification during in situ simulation debriefing: a qualitative analysis.

Shah S, McGowan M, Petrosoniak A BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn. 2022; 7(4):194-198.

PMID: 35516823 PMC: 8936644. DOI: 10.1136/bmjstel-2020-000650.


References
1.
Schubert T, Jacob A, Pansini M, Liu D, Gutzeit A, Kos S . CT-guided interventions using a free-hand, optical tracking system: initial clinical experience. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2012; 36(4):1055-62. DOI: 10.1007/s00270-012-0527-5. View

2.
Couto T, Kerrey B, Taylor R, Fitzgerald M, Geis G . Teamwork skills in actual, in situ, and in-center pediatric emergencies: performance levels across settings and perceptions of comparative educational impact. Simul Healthc. 2015; 10(2):76-84. DOI: 10.1097/SIH.0000000000000081. View

3.
Etchells E, Woodcock T . Value of small sample sizes in rapid-cycle quality improvement projects 2: assessing fidelity of implementation for improvement interventions. BMJ Qual Saf. 2017; 27(1):61-65. PMC: 5750430. DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2017-006963. View

4.
Mathieu J, Heffner T, Goodwin G, Salas E . The influence of shared mental models on team process and performance. J Appl Psychol. 2000; 85(2):273-83. DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.85.2.273. View

5.
Chan T, Vilke G, Bramwell K, DAVIS D, Hamilton R, Rosen P . Comparison of wire-guided cricothyrotomy versus standard surgical cricothyrotomy technique. J Emerg Med. 1999; 17(6):957-62. DOI: 10.1016/s0736-4679(99)00123-7. View