» Articles » PMID: 35519817

A Non-redundant Function of MNS5: A Class I α-1, 2 Mannosidase, in the Regulation of Endoplasmic Reticulum-Associated Degradation of Misfolded Glycoproteins

Overview
Journal Front Plant Sci
Date 2022 May 6
PMID 35519817
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Endoplasmic Reticulum-Associated Degradation (ERAD) is one of the major processes in maintaining protein homeostasis. Class I α-mannosidases MNS4 and MNS5 are involved in the degradation of misfolded variants of the heavily glycosylated proteins, playing an important role for glycan-dependent ERAD . MNS4 and MNS5 reportedly have functional redundancy, meaning that only the loss of both MNS4 and MNS5 shows phenotypes. However, MNS4 is a membrane-associated protein while MNS5 is a soluble protein, and both can localize to the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). Furthermore, MNS4 and MNS5 differentially demannosylate the glycoprotein substrates. Importantly, we found that their gene expression patterns are complemented rather than overlapped. This raises the question of whether they indeed work redundantly, warranting a further investigation. Here, we conducted an exhaustive genetic screen for a suppressor of the , a brassinosteroid (BR) receptor mutant with its receptor downregulated by ERAD, and isolated , a suppressor of mutant named after (suppressor of ). After genetic mapping together with whole-genome re-sequencing, we identified a point mutation G343E in AT1G27520 (MNS5) in . Genetic complementation experiments confirmed that was a loss-of-function allele of . In addition, suppressed the dwarf phenotype of in the proteasome-independent ERAD pathway and in the proteasome-dependent ERAD pathway. Importantly, could only affect BRI1/bri1 with kinase activities such that it restored BR-sensitivities of , , and but not null . Furthermore, was less tolerant to tunicamycin and salt than the wild-type plants. Thus, our study uncovers a non-redundant function of MNS5 in the regulation of ERAD as well as plant growth and ER stress response, highlighting a need of the traditional forward genetic approach to complement the T-DNA or CRISPR-Cas9 systems on gene functional study.

Citing Articles

Protein degrons and degradation: Exploring substrate recognition and pathway selection in plants.

Isono E, Li J, Pulido P, Siao W, Spoel S, Wang Z Plant Cell. 2024; 36(9):3074-3098.

PMID: 38701343 PMC: 11371205. DOI: 10.1093/plcell/koae141.


A Predominant Role of AtEDEM1 in Catalyzing a Rate-Limiting Demannosylation Step of an Arabidopsis Endoplasmic Reticulum-Associated Degradation Process.

Zhang J, Xia Y, Wang D, Du Y, Chen Y, Zhang C Front Plant Sci. 2022; 13:952246.

PMID: 35874007 PMC: 9302962. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2022.952246.


The Role of SBI2/ALG12/EBS4 in the Regulation of Endoplasmic Reticulum-Associated Degradation (ERAD) Studied by a Null Allele.

Sun X, Zhao D, Ali K, Zhu Y, Wu G, Li G Int J Mol Sci. 2022; 23(10).

PMID: 35628619 PMC: 9147235. DOI: 10.3390/ijms23105811.

References
1.
Dawlaty M, Ganz K, Powell B, Hu Y, Markoulaki S, Cheng A . Tet1 is dispensable for maintaining pluripotency and its loss is compatible with embryonic and postnatal development. Cell Stem Cell. 2011; 9(2):166-75. PMC: 3154739. DOI: 10.1016/j.stem.2011.07.010. View

2.
Huttner S, Veit C, Vavra U, Schoberer J, Dicker M, Maresch D . A context-independent N-glycan signal targets the misfolded extracellular domain of Arabidopsis STRUBBELIG to endoplasmic-reticulum-associated degradation. Biochem J. 2014; 464(3):401-11. PMC: 4255730. DOI: 10.1042/BJ20141057. View

3.
Hou Q, Saima S, Ren H, Ali K, Bai C, Wu G . Less Conserved LRRs Is Important for BRI1 Folding. Front Plant Sci. 2019; 10:634. PMC: 6536576. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2019.00634. View

4.
Taylor S, Thibault P, Tessier D, Bergeron J, Thomas D . Glycopeptide specificity of the secretory protein folding sensor UDP-glucose glycoprotein:glucosyltransferase. EMBO Rep. 2003; 4(4):405-11. PMC: 1319153. DOI: 10.1038/sj.embor.embor797. View

5.
Ellgaard L, Helenius A . Quality control in the endoplasmic reticulum. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2003; 4(3):181-91. DOI: 10.1038/nrm1052. View