» Articles » PMID: 35518390

A Novel Lamellar Structural Biomaterial and Its Effect on Bone Regeneration

Overview
Journal RSC Adv
Specialty Chemistry
Date 2022 May 6
PMID 35518390
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

To evaluate a novel lamellar structural biomaterial as a potential biomaterial for guided bone regeneration, we describe the preparation of a collagen membrane with high mechanical strength and anti-enzyme degradation ability by using the multi-level structure of scales. The physical and chemical properties, degradation, biocompatibility, and osteogenic activity were preliminarily evaluated. In conclusion, it was shown that the multi-layered collagen structure material had sufficient mechanical properties, biocompatibility, and osteogenic ability. Meanwhile, it is also shown that there is a gap in current clinical needs, between the guided tissue regeneration membrane and the one being used. Therefore, this study provides useful insights into the efforts being made to design and adjust the microstructure to balance its mechanical properties, degradation rate, and osteogenic activity.

Citing Articles

A Comparative Study of HA/DBM Compounds Derived from Bovine and Porcine for Bone Regeneration.

Roldan L, Isaza C, Ospina J, Montoya C, Dominguez J, Orrego S J Funct Biomater. 2023; 14(9).

PMID: 37754853 PMC: 10532284. DOI: 10.3390/jfb14090439.


Collagen Membrane Derived from Fish Scales for Application in Bone Tissue Engineering.

Chen L, Cheng G, Meng S, Ding Y Polymers (Basel). 2022; 14(13).

PMID: 35808577 PMC: 9269230. DOI: 10.3390/polym14132532.

References
1.
Al-Maawi S, Herrera-Vizcaino C, Orlowska A, Willershausen I, Sader R, Miron R . Biologization of Collagen-Based Biomaterials Using Liquid-Platelet-Rich Fibrin: New Insights into Clinically Applicable Tissue Engineering. Materials (Basel). 2019; 12(23). PMC: 6926831. DOI: 10.3390/ma12233993. View

2.
Schlegel K, Lang F, Donath K, Kulow J, Wiltfang J . The monocortical critical size bone defect as an alternative experimental model in testing bone substitute materials. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2006; 102(1):7-13. DOI: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2005.09.011. View

3.
Florjanski W, Orzeszek S, Olchowy A, Grychowska N, Wieckiewicz W, Malysa A . Modifications of Polymeric Membranes Used in Guided Tissue and Bone Regeneration. Polymers (Basel). 2019; 11(5). PMC: 6572646. DOI: 10.3390/polym11050782. View

4.
Hu X, Park S, Gil E, Xia X, Weiss A, Kaplan D . The influence of elasticity and surface roughness on myogenic and osteogenic-differentiation of cells on silk-elastin biomaterials. Biomaterials. 2011; 32(34):8979-89. PMC: 3206257. DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.08.037. View

5.
Roseti L, Parisi V, Petretta M, Cavallo C, Desando G, Bartolotti I . Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering: State of the art and new perspectives. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2017; 78:1246-1262. DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2017.05.017. View