» Articles » PMID: 35515958

Efficacy and Safety Profile of Novel Oral Anticoagulants in the Treatment of Left Atrial Thrombosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Overview
Specialty Pharmacology
Date 2022 May 6
PMID 35515958
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The presence of left atrial/left atrial appendage thrombosis is associated with a higher risk of thromboembolic events in patients with atrial fibrillation. The optimal antithrombotic strategy is not established to date.

Objective: Our aim was to compare the efficacy and safety profile of novel oral anticoagulants with warfarin in the treatment of left atrial/left atrial appendage thrombosis.

Methods: We conducted a systematic search in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov, and 3 Chinese databases for all randomized controlled trials and cohort studies (PROSPERO, CRD42021238952) from inception to 7 May 2021. Two authors independently performed the articles selection, data extraction, and quality assessment. The efficacy outcome was the resolution of left atrial/left atrial appendage thrombosis, and the safety outcomes were bleeding and stroke/transient ischemic attack.

Results: One randomized controlled trial and 5 cohort studies were included, with a total of 353 patients. Compared with warfarin, novel oral anticoagulants were associated with increased probability of left atrial/left atrial appendage thrombosis resolution (OR = 2.20; 95% CI, 1.35-3.60;  = 0%). Compared with warfarin, novel oral anticoagulants had a similar risk of bleeding (OR = 0.91; 95% CI, 0.39-2.13;  = 0%). There was no evidence of increased risk of stroke/transient ischemic attack (OR = 0.42; 95% CI, 0.12-1.45;  = 0%).

Conclusions: Novel oral anticoagulants were more effective than warfarin in promoting the resolution of left atrial/left atrial appendage thrombosis, without increased risks of bleeding and stroke/transient ischemic attack. Our study provides valuable insight into clinical practice. Further well-designed randomized controlled trials are needed to fully evaluate the benefits and risks in these patients. PROSPERO Registration No.: CRD42021238952.

References
1.
Da Costa A, Delolme C, Guichard J, Gerbay A, Pierrard R, Romeyer-Bouchard C . Comparison of prevalence and management of left atrial appendage thrombi under old and new anticoagulants prior to left atrial catheter ablation. Am Heart J. 2017; 193:8-15. DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2017.07.016. View

2.
Marsico F, Cecere M, Parente A, Paolillo S, De Martino F, Dellegrottaglie S . Effects of novel oral anticoagulants on left atrial and left atrial appendage thrombi: an appraisal. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2016; 43(2):139-148. DOI: 10.1007/s11239-016-1421-9. View

3.
Miyazawa K, Pastori D, Hammerstingl C, Cappato R, Meng I, Kramer F . Left atrial thrombus resolution in non-valvular atrial fibrillation or flutter: biomarker substudy results from a prospective study with rivaroxaban (X-TRA). Ann Med. 2018; 50(6):511-518. DOI: 10.1080/07853890.2018.1495337. View

4.
Lip G, Hammerstingl C, Marin F, Cappato R, Meng I, Kirsch B . Left atrial thrombus resolution in atrial fibrillation or flutter: Results of a prospective study with rivaroxaban (X-TRA) and a retrospective observational registry providing baseline data (CLOT-AF). Am Heart J. 2016; 178:126-34. DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2016.05.007. View

5.
Mearns E, Kohn C, Song J, Hawthorne J, Meng J, White C . Meta-analysis to assess the quality of international normalized ratio control and associated outcomes in venous thromboembolism patients. Thromb Res. 2014; 134(2):310-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.thromres.2014.05.035. View