» Articles » PMID: 35514456

In Situ Simulation and Its Effects on Patient Outcomes: a Systematic Review

Overview
Date 2022 May 6
PMID 35514456
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The use of in situ simulation has previously been shown to increase confidence, teamwork and practical skills of trained professionals. However, a direct benefit to patient outcomes has not been sufficiently explored. This review focuses on the effect of in situ simulation training in a hospital setting on morbidity or mortality.

Methods: A combined search was conducted in PUBMED, OVID, WEB OF SCIENCE, CINAHL, SCOPUS and EMBASE. 478 studies were screened with nine articles published between 2011 and 2017 meeting the inclusion criteria for analysis.

Results: This review selected eight prospective studies and one prospective-retrospective study. Three studies isolated in situ simulation as an experimental variable while the remaining studies implemented in situ programmes as a component of larger quality improvement initiatives. Seven studies demonstrated a significant improvement in morbidity and/or mortality outcomes following integrated in situ simulation training.

Conclusion: Existing literature, albeit limited, demonstrates that in situ training improves patient outcomes either in isolation or within a larger quality improvement programme. However, existing evidence contains difficulties such as isolating the impact of in situ training from various potential confounding factors and potential for publication bias.

Citing Articles

In situ simulation for cardiopulmonary resuscitation training: A systematic review.

Cortegiani A, Ippolito M, Abelairas-Gomez C, Nabecker S, Olaussen A, Lauridsen K Resusc Plus. 2025; 21:100863.

PMID: 39897060 PMC: 11787034. DOI: 10.1016/j.resplu.2024.100863.


Virtual Reality Training to Reduce Workplace Violence in Healthcare.

Clay C, Hochmuth J, Wirth O Issues Ment Health Nurs. 2025; 46(1):2-11.

PMID: 39761223 PMC: 11774209. DOI: 10.1080/01612840.2024.2429712.


Interprofessional In Situ Simulation's Impact on Healthcare Personnel's Competence and Reported Need for Training in Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation-A Pilot Study in Norway.

Grasto K, Leonardsen A Healthcare (Basel). 2024; 12(19).

PMID: 39408190 PMC: 11475961. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare12192010.


Virtual simulation training for postpartum hemorrhage in low-to-moderate-volume hospitals in the US.

Minor K, Bianco K, Mayo J, Abir G, Judy A, Lee H AJOG Glob Rep. 2024; 4(3):100357.

PMID: 38975047 PMC: 11227018. DOI: 10.1016/j.xagr.2024.100357.


Ward-based in situ simulation: lessons learnt from a UK District General Hospital.

Schwartze J, Das S, Suggitt D, Baxter J, Tunstall S, Ronan N BMJ Open Qual. 2024; 13(2).

PMID: 38749539 PMC: 11097843. DOI: 10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002571.


References
1.
Qureshi S, Ahern T, OShea R, Hatch L, Henderson S . A standardized Code Blue Team eliminates variable survival from in-hospital cardiac arrest. J Emerg Med. 2011; 42(1):74-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2010.10.023. View

2.
Zendejas B, Brydges R, Wang A, Cook D . Patient outcomes in simulation-based medical education: a systematic review. J Gen Intern Med. 2013; 28(8):1078-89. PMC: 3710391. DOI: 10.1007/s11606-012-2264-5. View

3.
Sorensen J, Ostergaard D, LeBlanc V, Ottesen B, Konge L, Dieckmann P . Design of simulation-based medical education and advantages and disadvantages of in situ simulation versus off-site simulation. BMC Med Educ. 2017; 17(1):20. PMC: 5251301. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-016-0838-3. View

4.
Sterne J, Hernan M, Reeves B, Savovic J, Berkman N, Viswanathan M . ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions. BMJ. 2016; 355:i4919. PMC: 5062054. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.i4919. View

5.
Lateef F . Simulation-based learning: Just like the real thing. J Emerg Trauma Shock. 2010; 3(4):348-52. PMC: 2966567. DOI: 10.4103/0974-2700.70743. View