» Articles » PMID: 35513735

Cost Analysis of Adjuvant Whole-Brain Radiotherapy Treatment Versus No Whole-Brain Radiotherapy After Stereotactic Radiosurgery And/or Surgery Among Adults with One to Three Melanoma Brain Metastases: Results from a Randomized Trial

Overview
Date 2022 May 5
PMID 35513735
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: We aimed to compare Australian health system costs at 12 months for adjuvant whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) treatment after stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and/or surgery versus observation among adults with one to three melanoma brain metastases. We hypothesized that treatment with adjuvant WBRT and subsequent healthcare would be more expensive than SRS/surgery alone.

Methods: The analysis was conducted alongside a multicentre, randomized phase III trial. A bespoke cost questionnaire was used to measure healthcare use, including hospitalizations, specialist and primary care visits, imaging, and medicines over 12 months. Mean per-patient costs were calculated based on the quantity of resources used and unit costs, reported in Australian dollars ($AU), year 2018 values. Skewness of cost data was determined using normality tests and censor-adjusted costs reported using the Kaplan-Meier sample average method. The analysis of difference in mean costs at each 2-month time point and at 12 months was performed and checked using Kruskal-Wallis, generalized linear models with gamma distribution and log link, modified Park test, ordinary least squares, and non-parametric bootstrapping.

Results: In total, 89 patients with similar characteristics at baseline were included in the cost analysis (n = 43 WBRT; n = 46 observation). Hospitalization cost was the main cost, ranging from 63 to 89% of total healthcare costs. The unadjusted 12-monthly cost for WBRT was $AU71,138 ± standard deviation 41,475 and for observation $AU69,848 ± 33,233; p = 0.7426. The censor-adjusted 12-monthly cost for WBRT was $AU90,277 ± 36,274 and $AU82,080 ± 34,411 for observation. There was no significant difference in 2-monthly costs between groups (p > 0.30 for all models).

Conclusions: Most costs were related to inpatient hospitalizations associated with disease recurrence. Adding WBRT after local SRS/surgery for patients with one to three melanoma brain metastases did not significantly increase health system costs during the first 12 months.

Trial Registration: ACTRN12607000512426, prospectively registered 14 September 2007.

References
1.
Mooney M, Mettlin C, Michalek A, Petrelli N, Kraybill W . Life-long screening of patients with intermediate-thickness cutaneous melanoma for asymptomatic pulmonary recurrences: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Cancer. 1997; 80(6):1052-64. DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0142(19970915)80:6<1052::aid-cncr7>3.0.co;2-b. View

2.
Agnese D, Abdessalam S, Burak Jr W, Magro C, Pozderac R, Walker M . Cost-effectiveness of sentinel lymph node biopsy in thin melanomas. Surgery. 2003; 134(4):542-7. DOI: 10.1016/s0039-6060(03)00275-7. View

3.
Bafaloukos D, Gogas H . The treatment of brain metastases in melanoma patients. Cancer Treat Rev. 2004; 30(6):515-20. DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2004.05.001. View

4.
Bottoni U, Clerico R, Paolino G, Ambrifi M, Corsetti P, Calvieri S . Predictors and survival in patients with melanoma brain metastases. Med Oncol. 2013; 30(1):466. DOI: 10.1007/s12032-013-0466-2. View

5.
Jensen I, Zacherle E, Blanchette C, Zhang J, Yin W . Evaluating cost benefits of combination therapies for advanced melanoma. Drugs Context. 2016; 5:212297. PMC: 4974051. DOI: 10.7573/dic.212297. View