» Articles » PMID: 35513395

Cost-effectiveness of Managing HBV Reactivation in Patients with Resolved HBV Infection Treated with Anti-CD20 Antibody for B-cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2022 May 5
PMID 35513395
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

There is no universal recommendation for managing the reactivation of HBV in patients with resolved HBV infection treated with anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies for B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma. This study compared the cost-effectiveness of two commonly used strategies: prophylactic anti-HBV nucleos(t)ide analog therapy (Pro NAT), and HBV DNA monitoring followed by on-demand antiviral therapy (HBV DNA monitoring). Using a decision tree model, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) expressed as cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained was calculated. The threshold for cost-effectiveness was set at 5,000,000 JPY, equivalent to 45,662 USD. In a base-case analysis, HBV DNA monitoring was found to be more cost-effective based on the calculation of ICER as 132,048 USD per QALY, a value that far exceeds 45,662 USD. The same results were consistently obtained by a one-way deterministic sensitivity analysis, even after changing each parameter value within the predetermined range. A probabilistic sensitivity analysis with 10,000 simulations also revealed that HBV DNA monitoring is more cost-effective than Pro NAT in 96.8% of cases. Therefore, this study suggests that HBV DNA monitoring is an appropriate managing measure in Japan from a cost-effectiveness perspective.

References
1.
Umemura T, Tanaka E, Kiyosawa K, Kumada H . Mortality secondary to fulminant hepatic failure in patients with prior resolution of hepatitis B virus infection in Japan. Clin Infect Dis. 2008; 47(5):e52-6. DOI: 10.1086/590968. View

2.
Bertram M, Lauer J, de Joncheere K, Edejer T, Hutubessy R, Kieny M . Cost-effectiveness thresholds: pros and cons. Bull World Health Organ. 2016; 94(12):925-930. PMC: 5153921. DOI: 10.2471/BLT.15.164418. View

3.
Wu C, Hsiao L, Chiou T, Gau J, Liu J, Yu Y . Lymphocyte/monocyte ratio and cycles of rituximab-containing therapy are risk factors for hepatitis B virus reactivation in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and resolved hepatitis B. Leuk Lymphoma. 2014; 56(8):2357-64. DOI: 10.3109/10428194.2014.991922. View

4.
Tan C, Kumar R, Koomanan N, Loo W, Farid M, Tao M . Clinical and economic evaluation of a surveillance protocol to manage hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation among lymphoma patients with resolved HBV infection receiving rituximab. Pharmacotherapy. 2021; 41(4):332-341. DOI: 10.1002/phar.2508. View

5.
Tsou H, Yang H, Hsiao C, Hsiung C, Liu T, Chuang M . Cost-effectiveness of preventing hepatitis B virus reactivation in patients with lymphoma and resolved HBV infection. J Formos Med Assoc. 2019; 119(1 Pt 2):335-344. DOI: 10.1016/j.jfma.2019.05.027. View