» Articles » PMID: 35507859

Recommended Levels of Calcium and Non-phytate Phosphorus for Yellow-feathered Broilers (finisher Phase)

Overview
Journal Anim Biosci
Date 2022 May 4
PMID 35507859
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: This study examined the effects of dietary calcium (Ca) and non-phytate phosphorus (NPP) on performance, tibial characteristics, meat quality and plasma biochemical variables in yellow-feathered broilers during 85 to 105 d of age.

Methods: A total of 720 heads of 85-d broilers were allocated into 9 groups and provided with three levels of Ca (0.65%, 0.75%, 0.85%), and NPP (0.25%, 0.30%, 0.35%) in diets for 21 d.

Results: The final body weight (FW), average daily gain (ADG), average daily feed intake (ADFI), and feed to gain ratio (F:G) were affected (p<0.05) by dietary Ca. From the quadratic regressions, the optimal level of Ca in diet were 0.71% for FW and ADG, and 0.67% for ADFI. Dietary Ca and NPP both significantly affected tibial breaking strength and density. From the quadratic regressions, the optimal level of Ca and NPP in diet were 0.81% and 0.37% for tibial density. The shear force of breast muscle of broilers given 0.75% or 0.85% Ca were lower than that in birds with 0.65% Ca and drip loss of birds given 0.65% or 0.75% Ca was lower than that in birds with 0.85% Ca (p<0.05). The drip loss of birds given 0.25% NPP was lowest among all NPP treatments (p<0.05). Calcium affected (p<0.05) the plasmal contents of phosphorus, osteocalcin (OC), parathyroid hormone (PTH) and calcitonin and the contents of OC and PTH were also influenced by dietary NPP.

Conclusion: Dietary Ca and NPP level affected tibial characteristics, meat quality and biochemical variables in plasma of finisher-phase yellow-feathered broilers (85 to 105 d) and Ca also affected growth performance. Dietary 0.71% Ca and 0.30% NPP were enough for growth performance, while considering the growth performance, tibial characteristics, meat quality and biochemical variables together, 0.75% Ca and 0.37% NPP were recommended.

References
1.
Maiorano G, Sobolewska A, Cianciullo D, Walasik K, Elminowska-Wenda G, Slawinska A . Influence of in ovo prebiotic and synbiotic administration on meat quality of broiler chickens. Poult Sci. 2012; 91(11):2963-9. DOI: 10.3382/ps.2012-02208. View

2.
Shim M, Karnuah A, Mitchell A, Anthony N, Pesti G, Aggrey S . The effects of growth rate on leg morphology and tibia breaking strength, mineral density, mineral content, and bone ash in broilers. Poult Sci. 2012; 91(8):1790-5. DOI: 10.3382/ps.2011-01968. View

3.
Swiatkiewicz S, Koreleski J, Arczewska-Wloek A . Effect of inulin and oligofructose on performance and bone characteristics of broiler chickens fed on diets with different concentrations of calcium and phosphorus. Br Poult Sci. 2011; 52(4):483-91. DOI: 10.1080/00071668.2011.602665. View

4.
Wang S, Chen W, Zhang H, Ruan D, Lin Y . Influence of particle size and calcium source on production performance, egg quality, and bone parameters in laying ducks. Poult Sci. 2014; 93(10):2560-6. DOI: 10.3382/ps.2014-03962. View

5.
Qian H, Kornegay E, Denbow D . Utilization of phytate phosphorus and calcium as influenced by microbial phytase, cholecalciferol, and the calcium: total phosphorus ratio in broiler diets. Poult Sci. 1997; 76(1):37-46. DOI: 10.1093/ps/76.1.37. View