» Articles » PMID: 35507131

Three-dimensional (3D) Liver Cell Models - a Tool for Bridging the Gap Between Animal Studies and Clinical Trials when Screening Liver Accumulation and Toxicity of Nanobiomaterials

Overview
Publisher Springer
Specialty Pharmacology
Date 2022 May 4
PMID 35507131
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Despite the exciting properties and wide-reaching applications of nanobiomaterials (NBMs) in human health and medicine, their translation from bench to bedside is slow, with a predominant issue being liver accumulation and toxicity following systemic administration. In vitro 2D cell-based assays and in vivo testing are the most popular and widely used methods for assessing liver toxicity at pre-clinical stages; however, these fall short in predicting toxicity for NBMs. Focusing on in vitro and in vivo assessment, the accurate prediction of human-specific hepatotoxicity is still a significant challenge to researchers. This review describes the relationship between NBMs and the liver, and the methods for assessing toxicity, focusing on the limitations they bring in the assessment of NBM hepatotoxicity as one of the reasons defining the poor translation for NBMs. We will then present some of the most recent advances towards the development of more biologically relevant in vitro liver methods based on tissue-mimetic 3D cell models and how these could facilitate the translation of NBMs going forward. Finally, we also discuss the low public acceptance and limited uptake of tissue-mimetic 3D models in pre-clinical assessment, despite the demonstrated technical and ethical advantages associated with them. 3D culture models for use as in vitro alternatives to traditional methods and conventional in vivo animal testing for testing liver accumulation and toxicity of nanobiomaterials.

Citing Articles

Hydrogel-Based Strategies for Liver Tissue Engineering.

Zhang Y, Li L, Dong L, Cheng Y, Huang X, Xue B Chem Bio Eng. 2025; 1(11):887-915.

PMID: 39975572 PMC: 11835278. DOI: 10.1021/cbe.4c00079.


Sacrificing Alginate in Decellularized Extracellular Matrix Scaffolds for Implantable Artificial Livers.

Nguyen C, Le V, Le T, Kim J, Back S, Koo K J Funct Biomater. 2025; 16(1).

PMID: 39852591 PMC: 11766338. DOI: 10.3390/jfb16010035.


Advances in drug-induced liver injury research: in vitro models, mechanisms, omics and gene modulation techniques.

Guo K, van den Beucken T Cell Biosci. 2024; 14(1):134.

PMID: 39488681 PMC: 11531151. DOI: 10.1186/s13578-024-01317-2.


Human Multi-Lineage Liver Organoid Model Reveals Impairment of CYP3A4 Expression upon Repeated Exposure to Graphene Oxide.

Romaldini A, Spano R, Veronesi M, Grimaldi B, Bandiera T, Sabella S Cells. 2024; 13(18.

PMID: 39329726 PMC: 11429598. DOI: 10.3390/cells13181542.


Ubiquitin specific peptidase (USP37) mediated effects in microscaffold-encapsulated cells: a comprehensive study on growth, proliferation and EMT.

De S, Chauhan R, Singh M, Singh N RSC Adv. 2024; 14(8):5461-5471.

PMID: 38352690 PMC: 10862100. DOI: 10.1039/d3ra08786g.


References
1.
Marques M, Choo Q, Ashtikar M, Rocha T, Bremer-Hoffmann S, Wacker M . Nanomedicines - Tiny particles and big challenges. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2019; 151-152:23-43. DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2019.06.003. View

2.
van der Meel R, Lammers T, Hennink W . Cancer nanomedicines: oversold or underappreciated?. Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2016; 14(1):1-5. PMC: 5404718. DOI: 10.1080/17425247.2017.1262346. View

3.
Wolfram J, Zhu M, Yang Y, Shen J, Gentile E, Paolino D . Safety of Nanoparticles in Medicine. Curr Drug Targets. 2015; 16(14):1671-81. PMC: 4964712. DOI: 10.2174/1389450115666140804124808. View

4.
Lee W . Drug-induced hepatotoxicity. N Engl J Med. 2003; 349(5):474-85. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMra021844. View

5.
Wu T, Tang M . Review of the effects of manufactured nanoparticles on mammalian target organs. J Appl Toxicol. 2017; 38(1):25-40. DOI: 10.1002/jat.3499. View