» Articles » PMID: 35506220

Dancing Drives Evolution of Sexual Size Dimorphism in Manakins

Abstract

Body size mediates life history, physiology and inter- and intra-specific interactions. Within species, sexes frequently differ in size, reflecting divergent selective pressures and/or constraints. Both sexual selection and differences in environmentally mediated reproductive constraints can drive sexual size dimorphism, but empirically testing causes of dimorphism is challenging. Manakins (Pipridae), a family of Neotropical birds comprising approximately 50 species, exhibit a broad range of size dimorphism from male- to female-biased and are distributed across gradients of precipitation and elevation. Males perform courtship displays ranging from simple hops to complex aerobatic manoeuvres. We tested associations between sexual size dimorphism and (a) agility and (b) environment, analysing morphological, behavioural and environmental data for 22 manakin species in a phylogenetic framework. Sexual dimorphism in mass was most strongly related to agility, with males being lighter than females in species performing more aerial display behaviours. However, wing and tarsus length dimorphism were more strongly associated with environmental variables, suggesting that different sources of selection act on different aspects of body size. These results highlight the strength of sexual selection in shaping morphology-even atypical patterns of dimorphism-while demonstrating the importance of constraints and ecological consequences of body size evolution.

Citing Articles

Peripheral hearing sensitivity is similar between the sexes in a benthic turtle species despite the larger body size of males.

Wang T, Yang J, Lei J, Huang J, Shi H, Wang J Ecol Evol. 2024; 14(8):e70130.

PMID: 39130099 PMC: 11310098. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.70130.


Genetic Foundation of Male Spur Length and Its Correlation with Female Egg Production in Chickens.

Chen A, Zhao X, Zhao X, Wang G, Zhang X, Ren X Animals (Basel). 2024; 14(12).

PMID: 38929399 PMC: 11200594. DOI: 10.3390/ani14121780.

References
1.
Blanckenhorn W . The evolution of body size: what keeps organisms small?. Q Rev Biol. 2000; 75(4):385-407. DOI: 10.1086/393620. View

2.
Lindsay W, Houck J, Giuliano C, Day L . Acrobatic courtship display coevolves with brain size in manakins (Pipridae). Brain Behav Evol. 2015; 85(1):29-36. DOI: 10.1159/000369244. View

3.
Freckleton R, Harvey P, Pagel M . Phylogenetic analysis and comparative data: a test and review of evidence. Am Nat. 2008; 160(6):712-26. DOI: 10.1086/343873. View

4.
Baker J, Meade A, Pagel M, Venditti C . Adaptive evolution toward larger size in mammals. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015; 112(16):5093-8. PMC: 4413265. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1419823112. View

5.
Barske J, Fusani L, Wikelski M, Feng N, Santos M, Schlinger B . Energetics of the acrobatic courtship in male golden-collared manakins (Manacus vitellinus). Proc Biol Sci. 2013; 281(1776):20132482. PMC: 3871312. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2013.2482. View