» Articles » PMID: 35504975

Comparison Study of Three Laparoscopic Ligation Procedures for Pediatric Inguinal Hernia: a Multicenter Cohort of 5523 Cases

Overview
Journal Hernia
Publisher Springer
Date 2022 May 3
PMID 35504975
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Single-site laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal ligation (SLPEL) for pediatric inguinal hernia has gained popularity worldwide. However, complications associated with extraperitoneal knotting are not rare. This study evaluated the effectiveness of a modified SLPEL (M-SLPEL) to decrease adverse events associated with ligation knotting by comparing it with two other methods: classical SLPEL (C-SLPEL) and intracorporeal purse-string suturing (IPS).

Methods: A multicenter retrospective comparative study was conducted among 5523 pediatric inguinal hernia patients. Cases were divided into three groups according to the surgical procedure: the M-SLPEL, C-SLPEL, and IPS groups. Data describing the clinical characteristics, operative time, and complications were collected.

Results: All procedures were performed uneventfully. There were no significant differences in the age at operation (mean 2.62 ± 1.38 years). The operative time was shorter in the M-SLPEL group both for unilateral hernias (12.5 ± 1.8 min in C-SLPEL, 11.7 ± 1.3 min in M-SLPEL, and 17.6 ± 2.9 min in IPS) and for bilateral hernias (15.1 ± 2.1 min, 14.6 ± 1.7 min, and 23.9 ± 2.3 min, respectively). The overall incidence of adverse events in the inguinal region was 0% for M-SLPEL, 2.2% for C-SLPEL, and 0.5% for IPS. All patients were followed up for 12-93 months (mean 54 months). Recurrence occurred in 8 cases in the C-SLPEL group, 1 case in the M-SLPEL group, and 8 cases in the IPS group, with no significance between groups. No scrotal hematoma, testicular atrophy, or iatrogenic cryptorchidism occurred in any group.

Conclusion: The M-SLPEL procedure has time-consumption efficiency equivalent to that of C-SLPEL and even fewer adverse events in the inguinal region than IPS and C-SLPEL.

Citing Articles

Outcomes from a new modified single needle laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure and cut off for pediatric inguinal hernia.

Zeng D, Pu C, Guo C, Kong X Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):12029.

PMID: 38797731 PMC: 11128452. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-62769-7.

References
1.
Yonggang H, Changfu Q, Ping W, Fangjie Z, Hao W, Zicheng G . Single-port laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure of inguinal hernia using "two-hooked" core needle apparatus in children. Hernia. 2019; 23(6):1267-1273. DOI: 10.1007/s10029-019-01933-9. View

2.
Wang Y, Zhang Q, Chen L, Lin Y, Zhang J, Wu D . Laparoscopic Percutaneous Extraperitoneal Internal Ring Closure for Pediatric Inguinal Hernia: 1,142 Cases. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2019; 29(6):845-851. DOI: 10.1089/lap.2018.0721. View

3.
Chu C, Chen J, Shen Y, Liu S, Sun L, Nie Y . Individualized treatment of pediatric inguinal hernia reduces adolescent recurrence rate: an analysis of 3006 cases. Surg Today. 2019; 50(5):499-508. DOI: 10.1007/s00595-019-01940-4. View

4.
Esposito C, Escolino M, Settimi A . Laparoscopic Pediatric Inguinal Hernia Repair Using Purse-String Suture: Technical Recommendations After 20 Years Experience. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2016; 26(9):748-9. DOI: 10.1089/lap.2016.0257. View

5.
Li S, Tang S, Aubdoollah T, Li S, Li K, Tong Q . A Modified Approach for Inguinal Hernias in Children: Hybrid Single-Incision Laparoscopic Intraperitoneal Ligation. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2015; 25(8):689-93. DOI: 10.1089/lap.2014.0474. View