» Articles » PMID: 35504645

Very Early Invasive Angiography Versus Standard of Care in Higher-risk Non-ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Study Protocol for the Prospective Multicentre Randomised Controlled RAPID N-STEMI Trial

Abstract

Background: There are a paucity of randomised data on the optimal timing of invasive coronary angiography (ICA) in higher-risk patients with non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (N-STEMI). International guideline recommendations for early ICA are primarily based on retrospective subgroup analyses of neutral trials.

Aims: The RAPID N-STEMI trial aims to determine whether very early percutaneous revascularisation improves clinical outcomes as compared with a standard of care strategy in higher-risk N-STEMI patients.

Methods And Analysis: RAPID N-STEMI is a prospective, multicentre, open-label, randomised-controlled, pragmatic strategy trial. Higher-risk N-STEMI patients, as defined by Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events 2.0 score ≥118, or >90 with at least one additional high-risk feature, were randomised to either: very early ICA±revascularisation or standard of care timing of ICA±revascularisation. The primary outcome is the proportion of participants with at least one of the following events (all-cause mortality, non-fatal myocardial infarction and hospital admission for heart failure) at 12 months. Key secondary outcomes include major bleeding and stroke. A hypothesis generating cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) substudy will provide mechanistic data on infarct size, myocardial salvage and residual ischaemia post percutaneous coronary intervention. On 7 April 2021, the sponsor discontinued enrolment due to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and lower than expected event rates. 425 patients were enrolled, and 61 patients underwent CMR.

Ethics And Dissemination: The trial has been reviewed and approved by the East of England Cambridge East Research Ethics Committee (18/EE/0222). The study results will be submitted for publication within 6 months of completion.

Trial Registration Number: NCT03707314; Pre-results.

Citing Articles

Very early invasive strategy in higher risk non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome: the RAPID NSTEMI trial.

Kite T, Ladwiniec A, Greenwood J, Gale C, Anantharam B, More R Heart. 2023; 110(7):500-507.

PMID: 38103913 PMC: 10958296. DOI: 10.1136/heartjnl-2023-323513.

References
1.
Badings E, The S, Dambrink J, Wijngaarden J, Tjeerdsma G, Rasoul S . Early or late intervention in high-risk non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: results of the ELISA-3 trial. EuroIntervention. 2013; 9(1):54-61. DOI: 10.4244/EIJV9I1A9. View

2.
Eitel I, Desch S, Fuernau G, Hildebrand L, Gutberlet M, Schuler G . Prognostic significance and determinants of myocardial salvage assessed by cardiovascular magnetic resonance in acute reperfused myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010; 55(22):2470-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.01.049. View

3.
Wu J, Mamas M, de Belder M, Deanfield J, Gale C . Second Decline in Admissions With Heart Failure and Myocardial Infarction During the COVID-19 Pandemic. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021; 77(8):1141-1143. PMC: 8888028. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.12.039. View

4.
Mak K, Topol E . Emerging concepts in the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients with diabetes mellitus. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000; 35(3):563-8. DOI: 10.1016/s0735-1097(99)00628-2. View

5.
Eitel I, Stiermaier T, Lange T, Rommel K, Koschalka A, Kowallick J . Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Myocardial Feature Tracking for Optimized Prediction of Cardiovascular Events Following Myocardial Infarction. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018; 11(10):1433-1444. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2017.11.034. View