» Articles » PMID: 35502272

Comparison of F-NaF Imaging, Tc-MDP Scintigraphy, and F-FDG for Detecting Bone Metastases

Overview
Publisher Thieme
Specialty Nuclear Medicine
Date 2022 May 3
PMID 35502272
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Bone is a common metastasis site in several malignancies, most importantly prostate and breast cancers. Given the significance of the early and accurate diagnosis of bone metastases for preliminary staging, treatment planning and monitoring, restaging, and survival prediction in patients with malignancy, it is critical to compare and contrast the strengths and weaknesses of imaging modalities. Although technetium-99m-labeled diphosphonates [ Tc-MDP] scintigraphy has been used for assessing skeletal involvement, there is a renewed interest in fluorine-18-labeled sodium fluoride [ F-NaF] bone imaging with positron emission tomography or positron emission tomography/computed tomography, since this approach provides essential advantages in bone metastases evaluation. This review study aimed to discuss the basic and technical aspects of F-NaF imaging and its mechanism of action, and compare this modality with the Tc-MDP bone scan and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose using current evidence from the pertinent literature and case examples of the center in the study.

Citing Articles

Radiopharmaceuticals and their applications in medicine.

Zhang S, Wang X, Gao X, Chen X, Li L, Li G Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2025; 10(1):1.

PMID: 39747850 PMC: 11697352. DOI: 10.1038/s41392-024-02041-6.


Bone scintigraphy based on deep learning model and modified growth optimizer.

Magdy O, Elaziz M, Dahou A, Ewees A, Elgarayhi A, Sallah M Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):25627.

PMID: 39465262 PMC: 11514163. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-73991-8.


Tumor Burden of Iodine-Avid Bone Metastatic Thyroid Cancer Identified via F-Sodium Fluoride PET/CT Imaging.

Nappi C, Zampella E, Gaudieri V, Volpe F, Piscopo L, Vallone C J Clin Med. 2024; 13(2).

PMID: 38276075 PMC: 10816004. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13020569.


Comparison of the diagnostic value of 18F-NaF PET/CT and Tc-MDP SPECT for bone metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Fan Z, Wang T, Zou L, Liu D Transl Cancer Res. 2023; 12(11):3166-3178.

PMID: 38130318 PMC: 10731341. DOI: 10.21037/tcr-23-817.


Bone Scans in Preoperative Investigations of Breast Cancer Cases.

Mansy I, Elsenosy A, Hassan E, Abdelgader M Cureus. 2023; 15(12):e50499.

PMID: 38125688 PMC: 10730980. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.50499.


References
1.
Minamimoto R, Loening A, Jamali M, Barkhodari A, Mosci C, Jackson T . Prospective Comparison of 99mTc-MDP Scintigraphy, Combined 18F-NaF and 18F-FDG PET/CT, and Whole-Body MRI in Patients with Breast and Prostate Cancer. J Nucl Med. 2015; 56(12):1862-8. DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.115.162610. View

2.
Norgaard M, Jensen A, Jacobsen J, Cetin K, Fryzek J, Sorensen H . Skeletal related events, bone metastasis and survival of prostate cancer: a population based cohort study in Denmark (1999 to 2007). J Urol. 2010; 184(1):162-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.03.034. View

3.
Mick C, James T, Hill J, Williams P, Perry M . Molecular imaging in oncology: (18)F-sodium fluoride PET imaging of osseous metastatic disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014; 203(2):263-71. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.13.12158. View

4.
Messiou C, Cook G, deSouza N . Imaging metastatic bone disease from carcinoma of the prostate. Br J Cancer. 2009; 101(8):1225-32. PMC: 2768452. DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605334. View

5.
Zhang Y, Shi H, Cheng D, Jiang L, Xiu Y, Li B . Added value of SPECT/spiral CT versus SPECT in diagnosing solitary spinal lesions in patients with extraskeletal malignancies. Nucl Med Commun. 2013; 34(5):451-8. DOI: 10.1097/MNM.0b013e32835fa552. View