» Articles » PMID: 35501469

Cerebellar Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 3: a Randomized, Double-Blind, Sham-Controlled Trial

Overview
Specialty Neurology
Date 2022 May 2
PMID 35501469
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Repeated sessions of cerebellar anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) have been suggested to modulate cerebellar-motor cortex (M1) connectivity and decrease ataxia severity. However, therapeutic trials involving etiologically homogeneous groups of ataxia patients are lacking. The objective of this study was to investigate if a two-week regimen of daily cerebellar tDCS sessions diminishes ataxia and non-motor symptom severity and alters cerebellar-M1 connectivity in individuals with spinocerebellar ataxia type 3 (SCA3). We conducted a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial in which twenty mildly to moderately affected SCA3 patients received ten sessions of real or sham cerebellar tDCS (i.e., five days per week for two consecutive weeks). Effects were evaluated after two weeks, three months, six months, and twelve months. Change in Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA) score after two weeks was defined as the primary endpoint. Static posturography, SCA Functional Index tests, various patient-reported outcome measures, the cerebellar cognitive affective syndrome scale, and paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation to examine cerebellar brain inhibition (CBI) served as secondary endpoints. Absolute change in SARA score did not differ between both trial arms at any of the time points. We observed significant short-term improvements in several motor, cognitive, and patient-reported outcomes after the last stimulation session in both groups but no treatment effects in favor of real tDCS. Nonetheless, some of the patients in the intervention arm showed a sustained reduction in SARA score lasting six or even twelve months, indicating interindividual variability in treatment response. CBI, which reflects the functional integrity of the cerebellothalamocortical tract, remained unchanged after ten tDCS sessions. Albeit exploratory, there was some indication for between-group differences in SARA speech score after six and twelve months and in the number of extracerebellar signs after three and six months. Taken together, our study does not provide evidence that a two-week treatment with daily cerebellar tDCS sessions reduces ataxia severity or restores cerebellar-M1 connectivity in early-to-middle-stage SCA3 patients at the group level. In order to potentially increase therapeutic efficacy, further research is warranted to identify individual predictors of symptomatic improvement.

Citing Articles

Associations between CAG repeat size, brain and spinal cord volume loss, and motor symptoms in spinocerebellar ataxia type 3: a cohort study.

Ye Z, Chen X, Li M, Chen X, Qiu Y, Yuan R Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2025; 20(1):35.

PMID: 39849568 PMC: 11761751. DOI: 10.1186/s13023-025-03531-8.


Cerebellar Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in the Cerebellar Cognitive Affective Syndrome: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Sham-Controlled Trial.

Reumers S, Maas R, Schutter D, Teerenstra S, Kessels R, de Leeuw F Mov Disord. 2024; 40(1):121-131.

PMID: 39487643 PMC: 11752977. DOI: 10.1002/mds.30043.


Differential Effects of Cerebellar Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation with Gait Training on Functional Mobility, Balance, and Ataxia Symptoms.

Brito R, Fabricio J, Araujo A, Sacchi M, Baltar A, Lima F Cerebellum. 2024; 23(6):2457-2467.

PMID: 39367955 DOI: 10.1007/s12311-024-01750-6.


Effects of Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation for Degenerative Cerebellar Ataxia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Matsugi A, Ohtsuka H, Bando K, Kondo Y, Kikuchi Y Mov Disord Clin Pract. 2024; 11(11):1323-1334.

PMID: 39221650 PMC: 11542298. DOI: 10.1002/mdc3.14205.


Evaluating the effects of tDCS on depressive and anxiety symptoms from a transdiagnostic perspective: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Zheng E, Wong N, Yang A, Lee T Transl Psychiatry. 2024; 14(1):295.

PMID: 39025832 PMC: 11258305. DOI: 10.1038/s41398-024-03003-w.


References
1.
Klockgether T, Mariotti C, Paulson H . Spinocerebellar ataxia. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2019; 5(1):24. DOI: 10.1038/s41572-019-0074-3. View

2.
Brusse E, Brusse-Keizer M, Duivenvoorden H, Van Swieten J . Fatigue in spinocerebellar ataxia: patient self-assessment of an early and disabling symptom. Neurology. 2011; 76(11):953-9. PMC: 3059136. DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31821043a4. View

3.
Lo R, Figueroa K, Pulst S, Perlman S, Wilmot G, Gomez C . Depression and clinical progression in spinocerebellar ataxias. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2015; 22:87-92. PMC: 4695274. DOI: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2015.11.021. View

4.
Lopez-Bastida J, Perestelo-Perez L, Monton-Alvarez F, Serrano-Aguilar P . Social economic costs and health-related quality of life in patients with degenerative cerebellar ataxia in Spain. Mov Disord. 2007; 23(2):212-7. DOI: 10.1002/mds.21798. View

5.
Schmitz-Hubsch T, Coudert M, Giunti P, Globas C, Baliko L, Fancellu R . Self-rated health status in spinocerebellar ataxia--results from a European multicenter study. Mov Disord. 2010; 25(5):587-95. DOI: 10.1002/mds.22740. View