» Articles » PMID: 35501131

Transposable Element Accumulation Drives Size Differences Among Polymorphic Y Chromosomes in

Overview
Journal Genome Res
Specialty Genetics
Date 2022 May 2
PMID 35501131
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Y Chromosomes of many species are gene poor and show low levels of nucleotide variation, yet they often display high amounts of structural diversity. Dobzhansky cataloged several morphologically distinct Y Chromosomes in that differ in size and shape, but the molecular causes of their large size differences are unclear. Here we use cytogenetics and long-read sequencing to study the sequence content of polymorphic Y Chromosomes in We show that Y Chromosomes differ almost twofold in size, ranging from 30 to 60 Mb. Most of this size difference is caused by a handful of active transposable elements (TEs) that have recently expanded on the largest Y Chromosome, with different elements being responsible for Y expansion on differently sized Y's. We show that Y Chromosomes differ in their heterochromatin enrichment and expression of Y-enriched TEs, and also influence expression of dozens of autosomal and X-linked genes. The same helitron element that showed the most drastic amplification on the largest Y in independently amplified on a polymorphic large Y Chromosome in , suggesting that some TEs are inherently more prone to become deregulated on Y Chromosomes.

Citing Articles

Comprehensive analysis of the Xya riparia genome uncovers the dominance of DNA transposons, LTR/Gypsy elements, and their evolutionary dynamics.

Khan H, Yuan H, Liu X, Nie Y, Majid M BMC Genomics. 2024; 25(1):687.

PMID: 38997681 PMC: 11245825. DOI: 10.1186/s12864-024-10596-5.


High-Quality Genome Assemblies Reveal Evolutionary Dynamics of Repetitive DNA and Structural Rearrangements in the Drosophila virilis Subgroup.

Flynn J, Ahmed-Braimah Y, Long M, Wing R, Clark A Genome Biol Evol. 2023; 16(1).

PMID: 38159044 PMC: 10783647. DOI: 10.1093/gbe/evad238.


The chromatin source-sink hypothesis: a shared mode of chromatin-mediated regulations.

Murphy P, Berger F Development. 2023; 150(21).

PMID: 37922125 PMC: 10629678. DOI: 10.1242/dev.201989.


Paralog transcriptional differentiation in the D. melanogaster-specific gene family Sdic across populations and spermatogenesis stages.

Clifton B, Hariyani I, Kimura A, Luo F, Nguyen A, Ranz J Commun Biol. 2023; 6(1):1069.

PMID: 37864070 PMC: 10589255. DOI: 10.1038/s42003-023-05427-4.


Dynamics of transposable element accumulation in the non-recombining regions of mating-type chromosomes in anther-smut fungi.

Duhamel M, Hood M, Rodriguez de la Vega R, Giraud T Nat Commun. 2023; 14(1):5692.

PMID: 37709766 PMC: 10502011. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-41413-4.


References
1.
Sun L, Yu R, Dang W . Chromatin Architectural Changes during Cellular Senescence and Aging. Genes (Basel). 2018; 9(4). PMC: 5924553. DOI: 10.3390/genes9040211. View

2.
Li H, Durbin R . Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics. 2009; 25(14):1754-60. PMC: 2705234. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp324. View

3.
Carvalho A, Clark A . Y chromosome of D. pseudoobscura is not homologous to the ancestral Drosophila Y. Science. 2004; 307(5706):108-10. DOI: 10.1126/science.1101675. View

4.
Wong W, Simakov O, Bridge D, Cartwright P, Bellantuono A, Kuhn A . Expansion of a single transposable element family is associated with genome-size increase and radiation in the genus . Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019; 116(46):22915-22917. PMC: 6859323. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1910106116. View

5.
McKee B, Habera L, Vrana J . Evidence that intergenic spacer repeats of Drosophila melanogaster rRNA genes function as X-Y pairing sites in male meiosis, and a general model for achiasmatic pairing. Genetics. 1992; 132(2):529-44. PMC: 1205154. DOI: 10.1093/genetics/132.2.529. View