Clarifying the Relationship Between Self-Compassion and Mindfulness: An Ecological Momentary Assessment Study

Overview

Journal Mindfulness (N Y)

Publisher Springer

Specialty Psychiatry

Date 2022 May 2

PMID 35498122

Authors

Kaitlyn M Biehler

Kristin Naragon-Gainey

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Objectives: Self-compassion entails relating to one's negative experiences with awareness, acceptance, and kindness, and it is associated with greater well-being. The Self-Compassion Scale (SCS) includes mindfulness, which is theorized as a necessary precursor to a self-compassionate response. The present study examined associations of the SCS and its subscales with mindfulness and decentering at baseline and in daily life to clarify the measure's construct validity. We also tested whether self-compassion moderates the association between mindfulness and eudaimonic well-being in daily life during occasions of increased negative affect.

Method: The sample of 172 community adults completed the SCS at baseline and a 7-day ecological momentary assessment. The SCS's construct validity was tested with multilevel correlations and regressions. We tested the interaction of momentary mindfulness, momentary negative affect, and dispositional self-compassion in predicting momentary well-being.

Results: Results generally supported the construct validity of the SCS, but SCS mindfulness subscales were most closely associated with decentering scales in daily life. Higher dispositional self-compassion, higher momentary mindful awareness, and lower momentary negative affect predicted higher momentary eudaimonic well-being. However, self-compassion did not interact with momentary mindful awareness and negative affect.

Conclusions: The SCS generally related to measures of mindfulness and decentering as expected, but further work should be done to clarify subscale construct validity. Self-compassion was predictive of higher momentary eudaimonic well-being in people's daily lives, supportive of ecological validity, but trait levels of self-compassion did not affect the relationship between momentary mindfulness and eudaimonic well-being.

Citing Articles

Krejcova K, Krejci I, Chylova H, Rymesova P, Michalek P Heliyon. 2025; 11(1):e41377.

PMID: 39834415 PMC: 11743109. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e41377.

Resting vagally-mediated heart rate variability in the laboratory is associated with momentary negative affect and emotion regulation in daily life.

Bylsma L, DeMarree K, McMahon T, Park J, Biehler K, Naragon-Gainey K Psychophysiology. 2024; 61(12):e14668.

PMID: 39177251 PMC: 11579239. DOI: 10.1111/psyp.14668.

Measuring emotion dysregulation in daily life: an experience sampling study.

Weiss N, Dixon-Gordon K, Brick L, Goldstein S, Schick M, Laws H Anxiety Stress Coping. 2024; 38(1):17-35.

PMID: 38932637 PMC: 11671609. DOI: 10.1080/10615806.2024.2366031.

Compassion Dynamics in Medical Students: An Ecological Momentary Assessment Study.

Wooldridge J, Soriano E, Filip T, Moore R, Eyler L, Herbert M J Clin Psychol Med Settings. 2024; .

PMID: 38402300 DOI: 10.1007/s10880-024-10003-x.

Validation of the factor structure of the Experiences Questionnaire using Exploratory Graph Analysis.

Rader L, Drueke B, Forster S, Gauggel S, Mainz V Front Psychol. 2023; 14:1250802.

PMID: 38034302 PMC: 10684915. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1250802.

References

Ryan R, Deci E . On happiness and human potentials: a review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annu Rev Psychol. 2001; 52:141-66. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.141. View

Shapiro S, Carlson L, Astin J, Freedman B . Mechanisms of mindfulness. J Clin Psychol. 2005; 62(3):373-86. DOI: 10.1002/jclp.20237. View

Gu J, Cavanagh K, Baer R, Strauss C . An empirical examination of the factor structure of compassion. PLoS One. 2017; 12(2):e0172471. PMC: 5315311. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0172471. View

Naragon-Gainey K, DeMarree K . Structure and validity of measures of decentering and defusion. Psychol Assess. 2016; 29(7):935-954. DOI: 10.1037/pas0000405. View

Brenner R, Heath P, Vogel D, Crede M . Two is more valid than one: Examining the factor structure of the Self-Compassion Scale (SCS). J Couns Psychol. 2017; 64(6):696-707. DOI: 10.1037/cou0000211. View

de Vries L, Baselmans B, Bartels M . Smartphone-Based Ecological Momentary Assessment of Well-Being: A Systematic Review and Recommendations for Future Studies. J Happiness Stud. 2021; 22(5):2361-2408. PMC: 8550316. DOI: 10.1007/s10902-020-00324-7. View

Neff K, Whittaker T, Karl A . Examining the Factor Structure of the Self-Compassion Scale in Four Distinct Populations: Is the Use of a Total Scale Score Justified?. J Pers Assess. 2017; 99(6):596-607. DOI: 10.1080/00223891.2016.1269334. View

Gillanders D, Bolderston H, Bond F, Dempster M, Flaxman P, Campbell L . The development and initial validation of the cognitive fusion questionnaire. Behav Ther. 2014; 45(1):83-101. DOI: 10.1016/j.beth.2013.09.001. View

Fresco D, Moore M, van Dulmen M, Segal Z, Ma S, Teasdale J . Initial psychometric properties of the experiences questionnaire: validation of a self-report measure of decentering. Behav Ther. 2007; 38(3):234-46. DOI: 10.1016/j.beth.2006.08.003. View

10.

Shoham A, Goldstein P, Oren R, Spivak D, Bernstein A . Decentering in the process of cultivating mindfulness: An experience-sampling study in time and context. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2017; 85(2):123-134. DOI: 10.1037/ccp0000154. View

11.

Zessin U, Dickhauser O, Garbade S . The Relationship Between Self-Compassion and Well-Being: A Meta-Analysis. Appl Psychol Health Well Being. 2015; 7(3):340-64. DOI: 10.1111/aphw.12051. View

12.

Shiffman S, Stone A, Hufford M . Ecological momentary assessment. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2008; 4:1-32. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.3.022806.091415. View

13.

Lopez A, Sanderman R, Schroevers M . Mindfulness and Self-compassion as Unique and Common Predictors of Affect in the General Population. Mindfulness (N Y). 2016; 7(6):1289-1296. PMC: 5107192. DOI: 10.1007/s12671-016-0568-y. View

14.

Van Dam N, van Vugt M, Vago D, Schmalzl L, Saron C, Olendzki A . Mind the Hype: A Critical Evaluation and Prescriptive Agenda for Research on Mindfulness and Meditation. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2017; 13(1):36-61. PMC: 5758421. DOI: 10.1177/1745691617709589. View

15.

Brown K, Ryan R . The benefits of being present: mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2003; 84(4):822-48. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.84.4.822. View

16.

Hoge E, Holzel B, Marques L, Metcalf C, Brach N, Lazar S . Mindfulness and self-compassion in generalized anxiety disorder: examining predictors of disability. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2013; 2013:576258. PMC: 3794663. DOI: 10.1155/2013/576258. View

17.

Lau M, Bishop S, Segal Z, Buis T, Anderson N, Carlson L . The Toronto Mindfulness Scale: development and validation. J Clin Psychol. 2006; 62(12):1445-67. DOI: 10.1002/jclp.20326. View

18.

Teasdale J, Moore R, Hayhurst H, Pope M, Williams S, Segal Z . Metacognitive awareness and prevention of relapse in depression: empirical evidence. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2002; 70(2):275-87. DOI: 10.1037//0022-006x.70.2.275. View

19.

Heo M, Leon A . Sample sizes required to detect two-way and three-way interactions involving slope differences in mixed-effects linear models. J Biopharm Stat. 2010; 20(4):787-802. DOI: 10.1080/10543401003618819. View

20.

Holzel B, Lazar S, Gard T, Schuman-Olivier Z, Vago D, Ott U . How Does Mindfulness Meditation Work? Proposing Mechanisms of Action From a Conceptual and Neural Perspective. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2015; 6(6):537-59. DOI: 10.1177/1745691611419671. View