» Articles » PMID: 35495026

Cortical Tracking of Sung Speech in Adults Vs Infants: A Developmental Analysis

Abstract

Here we duplicate a neural tracking paradigm, previously published with infants (aged 4 to 11 months), with adult participants, in order to explore potential developmental similarities and differences in entrainment. Adults listened and watched passively as nursery rhymes were sung or chanted in infant-directed speech. Whole-head EEG (128 channels) was recorded, and cortical tracking of the sung speech in the delta (0.5-4 Hz), theta (4-8 Hz) and alpha (8-12 Hz) frequency bands was computed using linear decoders (multivariate Temporal Response Function models, mTRFs). Phase-amplitude coupling (PAC) was also computed to assess whether delta and theta phases temporally organize higher-frequency amplitudes for adults in the same pattern as found in the infant brain. Similar to previous infant participants, the adults showed significant cortical tracking of the sung speech in both delta and theta bands. However, the frequencies associated with peaks in stimulus-induced spectral power (PSD) in the two populations were different. PAC was also different in the adults compared to the infants. PAC was stronger for theta- versus delta- driven coupling in adults but was equal for delta- versus theta-driven coupling in infants. Adults also showed a stimulus-induced increase in low alpha power that was absent in infants. This may suggest adult recruitment of other cognitive processes, possibly related to comprehension or attention. The comparative data suggest that while infant and adult brains utilize essentially the same cortical mechanisms to track linguistic input, the operation of and interplay between these mechanisms may change with age and language experience.

Citing Articles

Infant low-frequency EEG cortical power, cortical tracking and phase-amplitude coupling predicts language a year later.

Attaheri A, Ni Choisdealbha A, Rocha S, Brusini P, Di Liberto G, Mead N PLoS One. 2024; 19(12):e0313274.

PMID: 39636849 PMC: 11620356. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0313274.


Examining the Neural Markers of Speech Rhythm in Silent Reading Using Mass Univariate Statistics of EEG Single Trials.

Powell S, Nayak S, Magne C Brain Sci. 2024; 14(11).

PMID: 39595905 PMC: 11592126. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci14111142.


Emergence of the cortical encoding of phonetic features in the first year of life.

Di Liberto G, Attaheri A, Cantisani G, Reilly R, Ni Choisdealbha A, Rocha S Nat Commun. 2023; 14(1):7789.

PMID: 38040720 PMC: 10692113. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-43490-x.


Modulation of EEG theta by naturalistic social content is not altered in infants with family history of autism.

Haartsen R, Charman T, Pasco G, Johnson M, Jones E Sci Rep. 2022; 12(1):20758.

PMID: 36456597 PMC: 9715667. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-24870-7.


Synchronizing with the rhythm: Infant neural entrainment to complex musical and speech stimuli.

Cantiani C, Dondena C, Molteni M, Riva V, Piazza C Front Psychol. 2022; 13:944670.

PMID: 36337544 PMC: 9635850. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.944670.

References
1.
Lizarazu M, Lallier M, Bourguignon M, Carreiras M, Molinaro N . Impaired neural response to speech edges in dyslexia. Cortex. 2021; 135:207-218. DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2020.09.033. View

2.
Boucher V, Gilbert A, Jemel B . The Role of Low-frequency Neural Oscillations in Speech Processing: Revisiting Delta Entrainment. J Cogn Neurosci. 2019; 31(8):1205-1215. DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_01410. View

3.
Giraud A, Poeppel D . Cortical oscillations and speech processing: emerging computational principles and operations. Nat Neurosci. 2012; 15(4):511-7. PMC: 4461038. DOI: 10.1038/nn.3063. View

4.
Lakatos P, Shah A, Knuth K, Ulbert I, Karmos G, Schroeder C . An oscillatory hierarchy controlling neuronal excitability and stimulus processing in the auditory cortex. J Neurophysiol. 2005; 94(3):1904-11. DOI: 10.1152/jn.00263.2005. View

5.
Aru J, Aru J, Priesemann V, Wibral M, Lana L, Pipa G . Untangling cross-frequency coupling in neuroscience. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2014; 31:51-61. DOI: 10.1016/j.conb.2014.08.002. View