» Articles » PMID: 35488168

Beer Production Potentiality of Some Non-Saccharomyces Yeast Obtained from a Traditional Beer Starter Emao

Overview
Specialty Microbiology
Date 2022 Apr 29
PMID 35488168
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The recent realisation regarding the potentiality of the long-neglected non-Saccharomyces yeasts in improving the flavour profile and functionality of alcoholic beverages has pushed researchers to search for such potent strains in many sources. We studied the fungal diversity and the rice beer production capability of the fungal strains isolated from emao-a traditional rice beer starter culture of the Boro community. Fifty distinct colonies were picked from mixed-culture plates, of which ten representative morphotypes were selected for species identification, and simultaneous saccharification and beer fermentation (SSBF) assay. The representative isolates were identified as Hyphopichia burtonii (Hbur-FI38, Hbur-FI44, Hbur-FI47 & Hbur-FI68), Saccharomyces cerevisiae (Scer-FI51), Wickerhamomyces anomalus (Wano-FI52), Candida carpophila (Ccar-FI53), Mucor circinelloides (Mcir-FI60), and Saccharomycopsis malanga (Smal-FI77 and Smal-FI84). The non-Saccharomyces yeast strains Hbur-FI38, Hbur-FI44, Ccar-FI53, and Smal-FI77 showed SSBF capacity on rice substrate producing beer that contained 7-10% (v/v) ethanol. A scaled-up fermentation assay was performed to assess the strain-wise fermentation behaviour in large-scale production. The nutritional, functional, and sensory qualities of the SSBF strain fermented beer were compared to the beer produced by emao. All the strains produced beer with reduced alcohol and energy value while compared to the traditional starter emao. Beer produced by both the strains of H. burtonii stood out with higher ascorbic acid, phenol, and antioxidant property, and improved sensory profile in addition to reduced alcohol and energy value. Such SSBF strains are advantageous over the non-SSBF S. cerevisiae strains as the former can be used for direct beer production from rice substrates.

Citing Articles

Alcoholic and non-alcoholic rosé wines made with Saccharomyces cerevisiae var. boulardii probiotic yeast.

Mulero-Cerezo J, Tunon-Molina A, Cano-Vicent A, Perez-Colomer L, Marti M, Serrano-Aroca A Arch Microbiol. 2023; 205(5):201.

PMID: 37081186 DOI: 10.1007/s00203-023-03534-8.


Study on the correlation between microbial communities with physicochemical properties and flavor substances in the Xiasha round of cave-brewed sauce-flavor Baijiu.

Ren T, Su W, Mu Y, Qi Q, Zhang D Front Microbiol. 2023; 14:1124817.

PMID: 36937267 PMC: 10014610. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1124817.

References
1.
Ambra R, Pastore G, Lucchetti S . The Role of Bioactive Phenolic Compounds on the Impact of Beer on Health. Molecules. 2021; 26(2). PMC: 7831491. DOI: 10.3390/molecules26020486. View

2.
McCarter K, Li C, Jiang Z, Lu W, Smith H, Xu G . Effect of Low-Dose Alcohol Consumption on Inflammation Following Transient Focal Cerebral Ischemia in Rats. Sci Rep. 2017; 7(1):12547. PMC: 5624984. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-12720-w. View

3.
Canonico L, Agarbati A, Comitini F, Ciani M . Torulaspora delbrueckii in the brewing process: A new approach to enhance bioflavour and to reduce ethanol content. Food Microbiol. 2016; 56:45-51. DOI: 10.1016/j.fm.2015.12.005. View

4.
Martinez-Gomez A, Caballero I, Blanco C . Phenols and Melanoidins as Natural Antioxidants in Beer. Structure, Reactivity and Antioxidant Activity. Biomolecules. 2020; 10(3). PMC: 7175304. DOI: 10.3390/biom10030400. View

5.
Chanprasartsuk O, Prakitchaiwattana C, Sanguandeekul R, Fleet G . Autochthonous yeasts associated with mature pineapple fruits, freshly crushed juice and their ferments; and the chemical changes during natural fermentation. Bioresour Technol. 2010; 101(19):7500-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.04.047. View