» Articles » PMID: 35488098

Framing Effects in Value-directed Remembering

Overview
Journal Mem Cognit
Specialty Psychology
Date 2022 Apr 29
PMID 35488098
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Changing how an issue is framed can influence both decision-making and metacognition, but framing a memory task in terms of gains and losses could also impact how learners prioritize information according to its value or importance. We investigated how framing task instructions and feedback in terms of gains and losses influences learners' ability to selectively remember valuable information at the expense of low-value information. Specifically, we presented learners with to-be-remembered words paired with point values and either told participants how many points they scored (the sum of the values of recalled words) or lost (the sum of the values of not-recalled words) on each list, with participants' goal being to maximize their scores or minimize their losses, respectively. Overall, participants were more selective for high-value words when their goals were framed in terms of point gains compared with when their goals were framed in terms of losses, and learners' metacognitive predictions of performance (JOLs) generally mapped onto this trend. Thus, framing in terms of losses for forgetting can reduce memory selectivity, perhaps because even small losses are salient, indicating that framing effects are not limited to decision-making but can influence memory and metacognitive processes as well.

Citing Articles

Bounded Rationality in Study Time Allocation: Evidence Based on Risky Choice Framing Effects.

Xu H, Gao Y, Xiao Q, Li N, Chu Y, Li X Behav Sci (Basel). 2024; 14(11).

PMID: 39594391 PMC: 11590912. DOI: 10.3390/bs14111091.


Responsible remembering: The role of metacognition, forgetting, attention, and retrieval in adaptive memory.

Murphy D Psychon Bull Rev. 2024; 32(1):156-175.

PMID: 39138722 PMC: 11836214. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-024-02554-9.


The perceived importance of words in large font guides learning and selective memory.

Murphy D, Rhodes M, Castel A Mem Cognit. 2024; 52(7):1463-1476.

PMID: 38641757 PMC: 11522127. DOI: 10.3758/s13421-024-01555-2.


Age-related differences in selective associative memory: implications for responsible remembering.

Murphy D, Hoover K, Castel A Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn. 2023; 31(4):682-704.

PMID: 37594007 PMC: 10874462. DOI: 10.1080/13825585.2023.2249189.


Age-Related Differences in Framing Selective Memory in Terms of Gains and Losses.

Murphy D, Castel A, Knowlton B Exp Aging Res. 2023; 50(4):506-521.

PMID: 37409470 PMC: 10770296. DOI: 10.1080/0361073X.2023.2233366.


References
1.
Greene N, Naveh-Benjamin M . Online experimentation and sampling in cognitive aging research. Psychol Aging. 2022; 37(1):72-83. DOI: 10.1037/pag0000655. View

2.
Murphy D, Castel A . The role of attention and ageing in the retrieval dynamics of value-directed remembering. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2021; 75(5):954-968. DOI: 10.1177/17470218211046612. View

3.
Murphy D, Castel A . Responsible Remembering and Forgetting in Younger and Older Adults. Exp Aging Res. 2022; 48(5):455-473. PMC: 9363524. DOI: 10.1080/0361073X.2022.2033592. View

4.
LEVIN , Schneider , Gaeth . All Frames Are Not Created Equal: A Typology and Critical Analysis of Framing Effects. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1998; 76(2):149-188. DOI: 10.1006/obhd.1998.2804. View

5.
Murphy D, Castel A . Metamemory that matters: judgments of importance can engage responsible remembering. Memory. 2021; 29(3):271-283. PMC: 8009862. DOI: 10.1080/09658211.2021.1887895. View