» Articles » PMID: 35477122

Are the Criteria for the Diagnosis of Premature Ejaculation Applicable to Gay Men or Sexual Activities Other Than Penile-Vaginal Intercourse?

Overview
Journal Sex Med
Date 2022 Apr 27
PMID 35477122
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: The criteria for premature ejaculation (PE) have generally been limited to the diagnosis of heterosexual men engaging in penile-vaginal intercourse and therefore the applicability of PE diagnostic criteria to gay men and to activities beyond penile-vaginal intercourse has yet to be explored in depth.

Aim: To compare the prevalence of PE in gay and straight men and to assess whether PE-related diagnostic measures (ejaculatory control, ejaculation latency [EL], and bother/distress) can be applied with confidence to gay men or to men engaging in sexual activities other than penile-vaginal intercourse.

Methods: Gay and straight participants (n = 3878) were recruited to take an online survey assessing sexual orientation, sexual function/dysfunction (including specific PE-related measures), sexual relationship satisfaction, and various other sexual behaviors during partnered sex or masturbation.

Outcomes: Comparison of ejaculatory control, EL, and bother/distress across gay and straight men, as well as across different types of sexual activities.

Results: A slightly lower PE prevalence among gay men became undetectable when other predictors of prevalence were included in a multivariate analysis (aOR = 0.87 [95% CI: 0.60-1.22]). Gay men with PE reported longer typical ELs (z = -3.35, P < .001) and lower distress (z = 3.68, P < .001) relative to straight men, but longer ELs and lower distress were also associated with anal sex.

Clinical Translation: Clinicians can feel confident about using existing criteria for the diagnosis of PE in gay men but should be aware of potentially longer ELs and lower PE-related bother/distress-probably related to the practice of anal sex-compared with straight men.

Strengths And Limitations: Although well-powered and international in scope, this study was limited by biases inherent to online surveys, the lack of a sizable sample of bisexual men, and a lack of differentiation between men with acquired vs lifelong PE.

Conclusions: Irrespective of sexual orientation, gay and straight men with PE reported shorter ELs, lower satisfaction, and greater bother/distress than functional counterparts. While PE-related diagnostic criteria (ejaculatory control, EL, and bother/distress) are applicable to gay men, accommodation for longer ELs and lower bother/distress in gay men should be considered. McNabney SM, Weseman CE, Hevesi K, et al. Are the Criteria for the Diagnosis of Premature Ejaculation Applicable to Gay Men or Sexual Activities Other than Penile-Vaginal Intercourse?. Sex Med 2022;10:100516.

Citing Articles

Are Specific Sexual Activities During Partnered Sex and Masturbation Related to Sexual Problems in Men?.

Rowland D, McNabney S, Attinger D, Harrold K, Hevesi K Int J Sex Health. 2024; 36(4):597-611.

PMID: 39552627 PMC: 11562910. DOI: 10.1080/19317611.2024.2389996.


Prevalence and associated factors of premature ejaculation and erectile dysfunction in young, single men who have sex with men in Lima, Peru.

Santillan-Romero A, Valladares-Garrido M, Juarez-Ubillus A, Morocho Alburqueque A, Valladares-Garrido D, Vera-Ponce V Sex Med. 2024; 12(2):qfae013.

PMID: 38560648 PMC: 10981762. DOI: 10.1093/sexmed/qfae013.


Progressive arousal: a new concept and definition for premature ejaculation.

Lucas Bustos P, Parron Carreno T, Moreno Gutierrez S, Fernandez Agis I Sex Med. 2023; 11(2):qfad014.

PMID: 37124144 PMC: 10136197. DOI: 10.1093/sexmed/qfad014.


Clinical Safety of a Pharmaceutical Formulation Containing an Extract of (L.) in Patients With Premature Ejaculation: A Pilot Study.

Batista L, de Carvalho Rocha Koga R, Tavares de Lima Teixeira A, Teixeira T, de Melo E, Carvalho J Am J Mens Health. 2023; 17(2):15579883231167819.

PMID: 37081737 PMC: 10126617. DOI: 10.1177/15579883231167819.


Does Bother/Distress Contribute to the Diagnosis of Premature Ejaculation?.

Rowland D, McNabney S, Hevesi K Sex Med. 2022; 10(5):100548.

PMID: 35952615 PMC: 9537260. DOI: 10.1016/j.esxm.2022.100548.


References
1.
Althof S . The psychology of premature ejaculation: therapies and consequences. J Sex Med. 2006; 3 Suppl 4:324-31. DOI: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2006.00308.x. View

2.
Strauss M, Smith G . Construct validity: advances in theory and methodology. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2008; 5:1-25. PMC: 2739261. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.032408.153639. View

3.
Lee W, Cho S, Lee Y, Lee Y, Oh C, Yoo C . Can estimated intravaginal ejaculatory latency time be used interchangeably with stopwatch-measured intravaginal ejaculatory latency time for the diagnosis of lifelong premature ejaculation?. Urology. 2015; 85(2):375-80. DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2014.09.036. View

4.
Sansone A, Aversa A, Corona G, Fisher A, Isidori A, La Vignera S . Management of premature ejaculation: a clinical guideline from the Italian Society of Andrology and Sexual Medicine (SIAMS). J Endocrinol Invest. 2020; 44(5):1103-1118. DOI: 10.1007/s40618-020-01458-4. View

5.
Althof S, McMahon C, Waldinger M, Serefoglu E, Shindel A, Adaikan P . An Update of the International Society of Sexual Medicine's Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Premature Ejaculation (PE). Sex Med. 2014; 2(2):60-90. PMC: 4184677. DOI: 10.1002/sm2.28. View