» Articles » PMID: 35471186

Analysis of Rod/cone Gap Junctions from the Reconstruction of Mouse Photoreceptor Terminals

Overview
Journal Elife
Specialty Biology
Date 2022 Apr 26
PMID 35471186
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Electrical coupling, mediated by gap junctions, contributes to signal averaging, synchronization, and noise reduction in neuronal circuits. In addition, gap junctions may also provide alternative neuronal pathways. However, because they are small and especially difficult to image, gap junctions are often ignored in large-scale 3D reconstructions. Here, we reconstruct gap junctions between photoreceptors in the mouse retina using serial blockface-scanning electron microscopy, focused ion beam-scanning electron microscopy, and confocal microscopy for the gap junction protein Cx36. An exuberant spray of fine telodendria extends from each cone pedicle (including blue cones) to contact 40-50 nearby rod spherules at sites of Cx36 labeling, with approximately 50 Cx36 clusters per cone pedicle and 2-3 per rod spherule. We were unable to detect rod/rod or cone/cone coupling. Thus, rod/cone coupling accounts for nearly all gap junctions between photoreceptors. We estimate a mean of 86 Cx36 channels per rod/cone pair, which may provide a maximum conductance of ~1200 pS, if all gap junction channels were open. This is comparable to the maximum conductance previously measured between rod/cone pairs in the presence of a dopamine antagonist to activate Cx36, suggesting that the open probability of gap junction channels can approach 100% under certain conditions.

Citing Articles

New insights into retinal circuits through EM connectomics: what we have learnt and what remains to be learned.

Sawant A, Saha A, Khoussine J, Sinha R, Hoon M Front Ophthalmol (Lausanne). 2024; 3:1168548.

PMID: 38983069 PMC: 11182165. DOI: 10.3389/fopht.2023.1168548.


Stephen Massey: a career in visual neuroscience.

Mills S, Marshak D Front Ophthalmol (Lausanne). 2024; 3:1194837.

PMID: 38983046 PMC: 11182122. DOI: 10.3389/fopht.2023.1194837.


Rod-cone signal interference in the retina shapes perception in primates.

Songco-Aguas A, Grimes W, Rieke F Front Ophthalmol (Lausanne). 2024; 3:1230084.

PMID: 38983027 PMC: 11182321. DOI: 10.3389/fopht.2023.1230084.


When microscopy and electrophysiology meet connectomics-Steve Massey's contribution to unraveling the structure and function of the rod/cone gap junction.

Ribelayga C, OBrien J Front Ophthalmol (Lausanne). 2024; 3:1305131.

PMID: 38983007 PMC: 11182179. DOI: 10.3389/fopht.2023.1305131.


Characterizing the rod pathway in cone-dominated thirteen-lined ground squirrels.

Ferguson R, Miyagishima K, Nadal-Nicolas F, Li W Front Ophthalmol (Lausanne). 2024; 3.

PMID: 38974057 PMC: 11182244. DOI: 10.3389/fopht.2023.1271882.


References
1.
Li S, Mitchell J, Briggs D, Young J, Long S, Fuerst P . Morphological Diversity of the Rod Spherule: A Study of Serially Reconstructed Electron Micrographs. PLoS One. 2016; 11(3):e0150024. PMC: 4773090. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0150024. View

2.
Helmstaedter M, Briggman K, Turaga S, Jain V, Seung H, Denk W . Connectomic reconstruction of the inner plexiform layer in the mouse retina. Nature. 2013; 500(7461):168-74. DOI: 10.1038/nature12346. View

3.
Bolte P, Herrling R, Dorgau B, Schultz K, Feigenspan A, Weiler R . Expression and Localization of Connexins in the Outer Retina of the Mouse. J Mol Neurosci. 2015; 58(2):178-92. DOI: 10.1007/s12031-015-0654-y. View

4.
Jin N, Zhang Z, Keung J, Youn S, Ishibashi M, Tian L . Molecular and functional architecture of the mouse photoreceptor network. Sci Adv. 2020; 6(28):eaba7232. PMC: 7439306. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.aba7232. View

5.
OBrien J . The ever-changing electrical synapse. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2014; 29:64-72. PMC: 4252917. DOI: 10.1016/j.conb.2014.05.011. View