» Articles » PMID: 35470429

ISPD 2021 Debate - All in Vitro Fertilization Cycles Should Involve Pre-implantation Genetic Testing to Improve Fetal Health and Pregnancy Outcomes

Overview
Journal Prenat Diagn
Publisher Wiley
Date 2022 Apr 26
PMID 35470429
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

For 3 decades, couples at increased risk for a genetic disorder have been offered preimplantation genetic testing (PGT). Simultaneously, PGT for aneuploidy (PGT-A) to improve in vitro fertilization (IVF) outcomes was introduced, but evidence of value-added remains inconsistent. Recently, lower genetic testing costs and shorter turnaround time have reinvigorated PGT-A. Additionally, a shift from blastomere (day 3) to blastocyst (day 5) transfer and embryo freezing advances support PGT without the time constraints of immediate transfer. PGT-A transformed from a time-constrained analysis of 1-2 cells to an "add on" study for all IVF. But should it be offered to all IVF patients? And if not, under what conditions? Pre-debate polling found 64% opposed to PGT for all IVF cycles with concerns voiced about cost, informed consent, and a "slippery slope". Leaving aside the inconsistent evidence of IVF improvement whether measured as miscarriage or livebirths with PGT-A, the debaters grappled with patient and provider desires versus the ethical concerns for the unborn child. However, the audience was not swayed; two thirds remained opposed to PGT for all IVF cycles.

Citing Articles

Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy: challenges in clinical practice.

Yang H, DeWan A, Desai M, Vermund S Hum Genomics. 2022; 16(1):69.

PMID: 36536471 PMC: 9764701. DOI: 10.1186/s40246-022-00442-8.


Polygenic risk score for embryo selection-not ready for prime time.

Polyakov A, Amor D, Savulescu J, Gyngell C, Georgiou E, Ross V Hum Reprod. 2022; 37(10):2229-2236.

PMID: 35852518 PMC: 9527452. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deac159.