A Qualitative Evaluation of Participants Experiences of Living with Back Pain, Lumbar Fusion Surgery, and Post-operative Rehabilitation

Overview

Journal Pilot Feasibility Stud

Publisher Biomed Central

Date 2022 Apr 26

PMID 35468872

Authors

James Greenwood

Michael Hurley

Alison McGregor

Orla McCourt

Fiona Jones

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: The use of lumbar fusion surgery is increasing in developed economies. High levels of patient dissatisfaction are reported post-operatively. To address this need, we developed a theoretically informed rehabilitation programme for use following lumbar fusion surgery (the REFS programme). We conducted a mixed methods randomised controlled feasibility study (REFS v 'usual care'). The numerical and feasibility outcomes are reported separately. The current qualitative study was 'nested' within the main feasibility study to explore participants' experiences before and after lumbar fusion surgery including the impact of rehabilitation content. This facilitated a deeper understanding of potential mechanisms of action, for theoretical and programme refinement.

Methods: A purposive sample (n = 10 'usual care', n = 10 REFS) was identified from the main feasibility study cohort. Individual semi-structured interviews were conducted post-operatively (median 8 months, range 5-11). Interview data were transcribed verbatim, coded, and analysed thematically.

Results: Three themes were constructed: the breadth and severity of impact associated with a chronic lumbar disorder was summarised in theme 1, 'Ever-decreasing circles; living with a chronic lumbar disorder'. Theme 2, 'What have I done? Reflections on recovery from lumbar fusion surgery', illustrated participants post-operative helplessness, which was associated with worsening mental health, problematic use of opioids, fear related to the instillation of metalware, and the important mitigating effect of informal social support. Theme 3 'Rehabilitation experiences' identified critical rehabilitation programme content including exercise, a shared rehabilitation experience, the opportunity for vicarious learning, and professional expertise.

Conclusions: To enhance patient benefit future REFS programme iterations should consider reinforcement of the identified valued programme content. Additional content should be considered to mitigate post-operative fear, which frequently aligned with the instillation of metalware into the spine. Participant's perceptions regarding the necessity of lumbar fusion surgery has potential implications for the surgical consent process.

Trial Registration: Study registration; ISRCTN60891364 , date registered 10/7/2014.

Citing Articles

A pre-, peri- and postoperative rehabilitation pathway for lumbar fusion surgery (REACT): a nonrandomized controlled clinical trial.

Bogaert L, Thys T, Van Wambeke P, Janssens L, Swinnen T, Moke L Eur Spine J. 2025; .

PMID: 39956883 DOI: 10.1007/s00586-025-08706-2.

Patients' experience on waiting for spinal arthrodesis: a qualitative study.

Pillastrini P, Ferrari S, Albano A, Beni M, Burbello I, De Cristofaro L Qual Life Res. 2024; .

PMID: 39648235 DOI: 10.1007/s11136-024-03861-3.

Qualitative study exploring the views of patients and healthcare providers on current rehabilitation practices after lumbar fusion surgery.

Thys T, Bogaert L, Dankaerts W, Depreitere B, Van Wambeke P, Brumangne S BMJ Open. 2024; 14(5):e077786.

PMID: 38816040 PMC: 11141188. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-077786.

Post-Operative Physical Therapy Following Cervical Spine Surgery: Analysis of Patient-Reported Outcomes.

Lorentz N, Galetta M, Zabat M, Raman T, Protopsaltis T, Fischer C Cureus. 2023; 15(6):e40559.

PMID: 37465791 PMC: 10351333. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.40559.

Best practice rehabilitation pathway for the management of single and double-level lumbar fusion surgery: a modified Delphi Study.

Bogaert L, Thys T, Depreitere B, Van Wambeke P, Dankaerts W, Brumagne S Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2023; 59(3):377-385.

PMID: 36988564 PMC: 10272932. DOI: 10.23736/S1973-9087.23.07735-3.

References

Greenwood J, McGregor A, Jones F, Hurley M . Rehabilitation following lumbar fusion surgery (REFS) a randomised controlled feasibility study. Eur Spine J. 2019; 28(4):735-744. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-019-05913-6. View

Bederman S, Mahomed N, Kreder H, McIsaac W, Coyte P, Wright J . In the eye of the beholder: preferences of patients, family physicians, and surgeons for lumbar spinal surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010; 35(1):108-15. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181b77f2d. View

Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, Michie S, Nazareth I, Petticrew M . Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ. 2008; 337:a1655. PMC: 2769032. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.a1655. View

Monticone M, Ferrante S, Teli M, Rocca B, Foti C, Lovi A . Management of catastrophising and kinesiophobia improves rehabilitation after fusion for lumbar spondylolisthesis and stenosis. A randomised controlled trial. Eur Spine J. 2013; 23(1):87-95. PMC: 3897823. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-013-2889-z. View

Vaismoradi M, Turunen H, Bondas T . Content analysis and thematic analysis: Implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study. Nurs Health Sci. 2013; 15(3):398-405. DOI: 10.1111/nhs.12048. View

Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J . Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007; 19(6):349-57. DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/mzm042. View

Dale J, Williams S, Bowyer V . What is the effect of peer support on diabetes outcomes in adults? A systematic review. Diabet Med. 2012; 29(11):1361-77. DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2012.03749.x. View

Toye F, Seers K, Hannink E, Barker K . A mega-ethnography of eleven qualitative evidence syntheses exploring the experience of living with chronic non-malignant pain. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2017; 17(1):116. PMC: 5540410. DOI: 10.1186/s12874-017-0392-7. View

Powell J, Rai A, Foy M, Casey A, Dabke H, Gibson A . The 'three-legged stool': a system for spinal informed consent. Bone Joint J. 2016; 98-B(11):1427-1430. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.98B11.37965. View

10.

Greenwood J, McGregor A, Jones F, Hurley M . Evaluating rehabilitation following lumbar fusion surgery (REFS): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials. 2015; 16:251. PMC: 4469118. DOI: 10.1186/s13063-015-0751-9. View

11.

Davidson K, Goldstein M, Kaplan R, Kaufmann P, Knatterud G, Orleans C . Evidence-based behavioral medicine: what is it and how do we achieve it?. Ann Behav Med. 2003; 26(3):161-71. DOI: 10.1207/S15324796ABM2603_01. View

12.

Venkataramanan V, Gignac M, Dunbar M, Garbuz D, Gollish J, Gross A . The importance of perceived helplessness and emotional health in understanding the relationship among pain, function, and satisfaction following revision knee replacement surgery. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2013; 21(7):911-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2013.04.005. View

13.

Korpershoek C, Bijl J, Hafsteinsdottir T . Self-efficacy and its influence on recovery of patients with stroke: a systematic review. J Adv Nurs. 2011; 67(9):1876-94. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2011.05659.x. View

14.

Deyo R, Gray D, Kreuter W, Mirza S, Martin B . United States trends in lumbar fusion surgery for degenerative conditions. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005; 30(12):1441-5. DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000166503.37969.8a. View

15.

Rushton A, Wright C, Heap A, White L, Eveleigh G, Heneghan N . Survey of current physiotherapy practice for patients undergoing lumbar spinal fusion in the United Kingdom. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014; 39(23):E1380-7. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000573. View

16.

Lewin S, Glenton C, Oxman A . Use of qualitative methods alongside randomised controlled trials of complex healthcare interventions: methodological study. BMJ. 2009; 339:b3496. PMC: 2741564. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.b3496. View

17.

Abbott A, Hedlund R, Tyni-Lenne R . Patients' experience post-lumbar fusion regarding back problems, recovery and expectations in terms of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Disabil Rehabil. 2010; 33(15-16):1399-408. DOI: 10.3109/09638288.2010.533240. View

18.

Soegaard R, Bunger C, Christiansen T, Christensen F . Determinants of cost-effectiveness in lumbar spinal fusion using the net benefit framework: a 2-year follow-up study among 695 patients. Eur Spine J. 2007; 16(11):1822-31. PMC: 2223348. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-007-0378-y. View

19.

DeJong G, Horn S, Gassaway J, Slavin M, Dijkers M . Toward a taxonomy of rehabilitation interventions: Using an inductive approach to examine the "black box" of rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004; 85(4):678-86. DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2003.06.033. View

20.

Tutton E, Achten J, Lamb S, Willett K, Costa M . A qualitative study of patient experience of an open fracture of the lower limb during acute care. Bone Joint J. 2018; 100-B(4):522-526. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.100B4.BJJ-2017-0891.R1. View