» Articles » PMID: 35464315

Brain-Computer Interface-Robot Training Enhances Upper Extremity Performance and Changes the Cortical Activation in Stroke Patients: A Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Study

Overview
Journal Front Neurosci
Date 2022 Apr 25
PMID 35464315
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: We evaluated the efficacy of brain-computer interface (BCI) training to explore the hypothesized beneficial effects of physiotherapy alone in chronic stroke patients with moderate or severe paresis. We also focused on the neuroplastic changes in the primary motor cortex (M) after BCI training.

Methods: In this study, 18 hospitalized chronic stroke patients with moderate or severe motor deficits participated. Patients were operated on for 20 sessions and followed up after 1 month. Functional assessments were performed at five points, namely, pre1-, pre2-, mid-, post-training, and 1-month follow-up. Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT) was used as the primary outcome measure, while Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA), its wrist and hand (FMA-WH) sub-score and its shoulder and elbow (FMA-SE) sub-score served as secondary outcome measures. Neuroplastic changes were measured by functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) at baseline and after 20 sessions of BCI training. Pearson correlation analysis was used to evaluate functional connectivity (FC) across time points.

Results: Compared to the baseline, better functional outcome was observed after BCI training and 1-month follow-up, including a significantly higher probability of achieving a clinically relevant increase in the WMFT full score (ΔWMFT score = 12.39 points, = 30.28, and < 0.001), WMFT completion time (ΔWMFT time = 248.39 s, = 16.83, and < 0.001), and FMA full score (ΔFMA-UE = 12.72 points, = 106.07, and < 0.001), FMA-WH sub-score (ΔFMA-WH = 5.6 points, = 35.53, and < 0.001), and FMA-SE sub-score (ΔFMA-SE = 8.06 points, = 22.38, and < 0.001). Compared to the baseline, after BCI training the FC between the ipsilateral M and the contralateral M was increased ( < 0.05), which was the same as the FC between the ipsilateral M and the ipsilateral frontal lobe, and the FC between the contralateral M and the contralateral frontal lobe was also increased ( < 0.05).

Conclusion: The findings demonstrate that BCI-based rehabilitation could be an effective intervention for the motor performance of patients after stroke with moderate or severe upper limb paresis and represents a potential strategy in stroke neurorehabilitation. Our results suggest that FC between ipsilesional M and frontal cortex might be enhanced after BCI training.

Clinical Trial Registration: www.chictr.org.cn, identifier: ChiCTR2100046301.

Citing Articles

A NIRS-Based Technique for Monitoring Brain Tissue Oxygenation in Stroke Patients.

Gutierrez-Martinez J, Vega-Martinez G, Toledo-Peral C, Mercado-Gutierrez J, Quinzanos-Fresnedo J Sensors (Basel). 2025; 24(24.

PMID: 39771909 PMC: 11679141. DOI: 10.3390/s24248175.


NiReject: toward automated bad channel detection in functional near-infrared spectroscopy.

Gerloff C, Yucel M, Mehlem L, Konrad K, Reindl V Neurophotonics. 2024; 11(4):045008.

PMID: 39497725 PMC: 11532795. DOI: 10.1117/1.NPh.11.4.045008.


Electroencephalogram-based adaptive closed-loop brain-computer interface in neurorehabilitation: a review.

Jin W, Zhu X, Qian L, Wu C, Yang F, Zhan D Front Comput Neurosci. 2024; 18:1431815.

PMID: 39371523 PMC: 11449715. DOI: 10.3389/fncom.2024.1431815.


Research hotspots and trends of brain-computer interface technology in stroke: a bibliometric study and visualization analysis.

Li F, Zhang D, Chen J, Tang K, Li X, Hou Z Front Neurosci. 2023; 17:1243151.

PMID: 37732305 PMC: 10507647. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1243151.


Neural Plasticity Changes Induced by Motor Robotic Rehabilitation in Stroke Patients: The Contribution of Functional Neuroimaging.

Bonanno L, Cannuli A, Pignolo L, Marino S, Quartarone A, Calabro R Bioengineering (Basel). 2023; 10(8).

PMID: 37627875 PMC: 10451271. DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering10080990.


References
1.
Ang K, Guan C, Phua K, Wang C, Zhou L, Tang K . Brain-computer interface-based robotic end effector system for wrist and hand rehabilitation: results of a three-armed randomized controlled trial for chronic stroke. Front Neuroeng. 2014; 7:30. PMC: 4114185. DOI: 10.3389/fneng.2014.00030. View

2.
Hummel F, Cohen L . Non-invasive brain stimulation: a new strategy to improve neurorehabilitation after stroke?. Lancet Neurol. 2006; 5(8):708-12. DOI: 10.1016/S1474-4422(06)70525-7. View

3.
Grefkes C, Nowak D, Eickhoff S, Dafotakis M, Kust J, Karbe H . Cortical connectivity after subcortical stroke assessed with functional magnetic resonance imaging. Ann Neurol. 2007; 63(2):236-46. DOI: 10.1002/ana.21228. View

4.
Pinter D, Pegritz S, Pargfrieder C, Reiter G, Wurm W, Gattringer T . Exploratory study on the effects of a robotic hand rehabilitation device on changes in grip strength and brain activity after stroke. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2013; 20(4):308-16. DOI: 10.1310/tsr2004-308. View

5.
Shindo K, Kawashima K, Ushiba J, Ota N, Ito M, Ota T . Effects of neurofeedback training with an electroencephalogram-based brain-computer interface for hand paralysis in patients with chronic stroke: a preliminary case series study. J Rehabil Med. 2011; 43(10):951-7. DOI: 10.2340/16501977-0859. View