» Articles » PMID: 35462574

Single-subject Analysis of Regional Brain Volumetric Measures Can Be Strongly Influenced by the Method for Head Size Adjustment

Overview
Journal Neuroradiology
Specialties Neurology
Radiology
Date 2022 Apr 25
PMID 35462574
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Total intracranial volume (TIV) is often a nuisance covariate in MRI-based brain volumetry. This study compared two TIV adjustment methods with respect to their impact on z-scores in single subject analyses of regional brain volume estimates.

Methods: Brain parenchyma, hippocampus, thalamus, and TIV were segmented in a normal database comprising 5059 T1w images. Regional volume estimates were adjusted for TIV using the residual method or the proportion method. Age was taken into account by regression with both methods. TIV- and age-adjusted regional volumes were transformed to z-scores and then compared between the two adjustment methods. Their impact on the detection of thalamus atrophy was tested in 127 patients with multiple sclerosis.

Results: The residual method removed the association with TIV in all regions. The proportion method resulted in a switch of the direction without relevant change of the strength of the association. The reduction of physiological between-subject variability was larger with the residual method than with the proportion method. The difference between z-scores obtained with the residual method versus the proportion method was strongly correlated with TIV. It was larger than one z-score point in 5% of the subjects. The area under the ROC curve of the TIV- and age-adjusted thalamus volume for identification of multiple sclerosis patients was larger with the residual method than with the proportion method (0.84 versus 0.79).

Conclusion: The residual method should be preferred for TIV and age adjustments of T1w-MRI-based brain volume estimates in single subject analyses.

Citing Articles

Comparison of approaches to control for intracranial volume in research on the association of brain volumes with cognitive outcomes.

Wang J, Hill-Jarrett T, Buto P, Pederson A, Sims K, Zimmerman S Hum Brain Mapp. 2024; 45(4):e26633.

PMID: 38433682 PMC: 10910271. DOI: 10.1002/hbm.26633.


Distinct cerebral small vessel disease impairment in early- and late-onset Alzheimer's disease.

Luo X, Hong H, Li K, Zeng Q, Wang S, Li Z Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2023; 10(8):1326-1337.

PMID: 37345812 PMC: 10424647. DOI: 10.1002/acn3.51824.


Commercial volumetric MRI reporting tools in multiple sclerosis: a systematic review of the evidence.

Mendelsohn Z, Pemberton H, Gray J, Goodkin O, Carrasco F, Scheel M Neuroradiology. 2022; 65(1):5-24.

PMID: 36331588 PMC: 9816195. DOI: 10.1007/s00234-022-03074-w.

References
1.
Raikos A, Paraskevas G, Yusuf F, Kordali P, Meditskou S, Al-Haj A . Etiopathogenesis of hyperostosis frontalis interna: a mystery still. Ann Anat. 2011; 193(5):453-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.aanat.2011.05.004. View

2.
Rudick R, Fisher E, Lee J, Simon J, Jacobs L . Use of the brain parenchymal fraction to measure whole brain atrophy in relapsing-remitting MS. Multiple Sclerosis Collaborative Research Group. Neurology. 1999; 53(8):1698-704. DOI: 10.1212/wnl.53.8.1698. View

3.
Sullivan E, Rosenbloom M, Desmond J, Pfefferbaum A . Sex differences in corpus callosum size: relationship to age and intracranial size. Neurobiol Aging. 2001; 22(4):603-11. DOI: 10.1016/s0197-4580(01)00232-9. View

4.
Whitwell J, Crum W, Watt H, Fox N . Normalization of cerebral volumes by use of intracranial volume: implications for longitudinal quantitative MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2001; 22(8):1483-9. PMC: 7974589. View

5.
Mathalon D, Sullivan E, Rawles J, Pfefferbaum A . Correction for head size in brain-imaging measurements. Psychiatry Res. 1993; 50(2):121-39. DOI: 10.1016/0925-4927(93)90016-b. View