» Articles » PMID: 35461279

Development of the Clinical Gestalt Assessment: a Visual Clinical Global Impression Scale for Proteus Syndrome

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2022 Apr 24
PMID 35461279
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Clinical outcome assessments are important tools for measuring the natural history of disease and efficacy of an intervention. The heterogenous phenotype and difficult to quantity features of Proteus syndrome present challenges to measuring clinical outcomes. To address these, we designed a global clinical assessment for Proteus syndrome, a rare mosaic overgrowth disorder. The Clinical Gestalt Assessment (CGA) aims to evaluate change over time in this phenotypically diverse disorder.

Results: We gathered paired serial photographs and radiographs obtained at 12-to-36-month intervals from our natural history study of Proteus syndrome. The chronologic order of each set was blinded and presented to clinicians familiar with overgrowth disorders. They were asked to determine the chronologic order and, based on that response, rate global clinical change using a seven-point scale (Much Worse, Worse, Minimally Worse, No Change, Minimally Improved, Improved, Much Improved). Following a pilot, we tested the inter-rater reliability of the CGA using eight cases rated by eight clinicians. Raters identified the correct chronologic order in 53 of 64 (83%) of responses. There was low inter-rater variance and poor to moderate reliability with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.46 (95% CI 0.24-0.75). The overall estimate of global change was Minimally Worse over time, which is an accurate reflection of the natural history of Proteus syndrome.

Conclusions: The CGA is a tool to evaluate clinical change over time in Proteus syndrome and may be a useful adjunct to measure clinical outcomes in prospective therapeutic trials.

Citing Articles

Human vascular organoids with a mosaic mutation recapitulate Proteus syndrome.

He S, Zhu Y, Chauhan S, Tavakol D, Lee J, Berris R bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 38328122 PMC: 10849631. DOI: 10.1101/2024.01.26.577324.

References
1.
Beachkofsky T, Sapp J, Biesecker L, Darling T . Progressive overgrowth of the cerebriform connective tissue nevus in patients with Proteus syndrome. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2010; 63(5):799-804. PMC: 3240941. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2009.12.012. View

2.
Dunlop B, Gray J, Rapaport M . Transdiagnostic Clinical Global Impression Scoring for Routine Clinical Settings. Behav Sci (Basel). 2017; 7(3). PMC: 5618048. DOI: 10.3390/bs7030040. View

3.
Sapp J, Buser A, Burton-Akright J, Keppler-Noreuil K, Biesecker L . A dyadic genotype-phenotype approach to diagnostic criteria for Proteus syndrome. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2019; 181(4):565-570. PMC: 7520016. DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.c.31744. View

4.
Kolevzon A, Ventola P, Keary C, Heimer G, Neul J, Adera M . Development of an adapted Clinical Global Impression scale for use in Angelman syndrome. J Neurodev Disord. 2021; 13(1):3. PMC: 7784030. DOI: 10.1186/s11689-020-09349-8. View

5.
Biesecker L . The multifaceted challenges of Proteus syndrome. JAMA. 2001; 285(17):2240-3. DOI: 10.1001/jama.285.17.2240. View