» Articles » PMID: 35460916

Are We Any WISER Yet? Progress and Contemporary Need for Smart Trials to Include Women in Coronary Artery Disease Trials

Overview
Publisher Elsevier
Date 2022 Apr 23
PMID 35460916
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Despite calls to ensure proportionate representation of both sexes in biomedical research, women continue to be underrepresented in cardiovascular disease (CVD) clinical trials. A comprehensive analysis of seven large suspected ischemic heart disease/coronary artery disease (IHD/CAD) clinical trials (PROMISE, ISCHEMIA, CIAO-ISCHEMIA, ORBITA, FAME, FAME 2 and COURAGE trial) provides understanding of contributions to barriers to enrollment of women and leads to strategies to address these barriers. Specifically, in the seven trials, enrollment of women did not exceed 27%, while numerous barriers are evident. Proposed strategies to improve women´s inclusion in clinical trials, include adding reproductive stage/estrogen status, attention to study design inclusion/exclusion criteria using female thresholds, consideration of diagnostic and intervention study design to be inclusive, increasing women and minorities in leadership positions, including sex as a biological variable (SABV) in study design and statistical analysis, and addressing social and race/ethnicity barriers. Dedicated action to actualizing these steps are needed at this time to developing diagnostic and therapeutic strategies resulting in better care and improved outcomes for CVD in women.

Citing Articles

Outcomes of Guideline-Recommended Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Women with Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease: A Longitudinal Cohort Study.

Delamain T, Delamain J, Braga S, Costa R, Siqueira D, Feres F Arq Bras Cardiol. 2025; 122(1):e20240249.

PMID: 39907376 PMC: 11805569. DOI: 10.36660/abc.20240249.


Reappraising Ischemic Heart Disease in Women.

Carberry J, Aubiniere-Robb L, Kamdar A, Lomholt-Welch H, Berry C Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2024; 24(4):118.

PMID: 39076281 PMC: 11273011. DOI: 10.31083/j.rcm2404118.


Sex Differences in Fractional Flow Reserve Utilization.

Bujak M, Malinowski K, Siudak Z, Cmiel A, Lesiak M, Bartus S J Clin Med. 2024; 13(14).

PMID: 39064067 PMC: 11277883. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13144028.


Patient-physician sex concordance and outcomes in cardiovascular disease: a systematic review.

Harik L, Yamamoto K, Kimura T, Rong L, Vogel B, Mehran R Eur Heart J. 2024; 45(17):1505-1511.

PMID: 38551446 PMC: 11075930. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehae121.


The Appropriateness of Medical Devices Is Strongly Influenced by Sex and Gender.

Campesi I, Franconi F, Serra P Life (Basel). 2024; 14(2).

PMID: 38398743 PMC: 10890141. DOI: 10.3390/life14020234.


References
1.
Spertus J, Jones P, Maron D, OBrien S, Reynolds H, Rosenberg Y . Health-Status Outcomes with Invasive or Conservative Care in Coronary Disease. N Engl J Med. 2020; 382(15):1408-1419. PMC: 7261489. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1916370. View

2.
Labinaz A, Marbach J, Jung R, Moreland R, Motazedian P, Di Santo P . Female Authorship in Preclinical Cardiovascular Research: Temporal Trends and Influence on Experimental Design. JACC Basic Transl Sci. 2019; 4(4):471-477. PMC: 6712050. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacbts.2019.04.004. View

3.
Ridker P, Everett B, Pradhan A, MacFadyen J, Solomon D, Zaharris E . Low-Dose Methotrexate for the Prevention of Atherosclerotic Events. N Engl J Med. 2018; 380(8):752-762. PMC: 6587584. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1809798. View

4.
Zhang Z, Fang J, Gillespie C, Wang G, Hong Y, Yoon P . Age-specific gender differences in in-hospital mortality by type of acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol. 2012; 109(8):1097-103. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2011.12.001. View

5.
Kurian A, Cardarelli K . Racial and ethnic differences in cardiovascular disease risk factors: a systematic review. Ethn Dis. 2007; 17(1):143-52. View