» Articles » PMID: 35459760

Combining Magnetic Resonance Diffusion-Weighted Imaging with Prostate-Specific Antigen to Differentiate Between Malignant and Benign Prostate Lesions

Overview
Journal Med Sci Monit
Date 2022 Apr 23
PMID 35459760
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

BACKGROUND We aimed to develop a combined model of quantitative parameters derived from 3 different magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) diffusion models and laboratory data related to prostate-specific antigen (PSA) for differentiating between prostate cancer (PCa) and benign lesions. MATERIAL AND METHODS Eighty-four patients pathologically confirmed as having PCa or benign disease were enrolled. All patients underwent multiparametric MRI before biopsy, added intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) imaging, and diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI). The following data were collected: quantitative parameters of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), IVIM, and DKI, preoperative total PSA, free/total PSA ratio, and PSA density (PSAD) values. A combined logistic regression model was established by above MRI quantitative parameters and PSA data to diagnose PCa. The Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2 (PI-RADS v2) was used to assess the lesions for comparison. RESULTS Thirty-two patients had PCa and 52 patients had benign lesions. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, only apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and PSAD were significant variables (P<0.05) and were thus retained in the model. The area under curve value of the combined model (0.911) was higher than that of ADC, PSAD, and PI-RADS v2 (0.887, 0.861, and 0.859, respectively) in univariate analysis, but without any statistically significant differences. The combined model generated greater clinical benefit than the independent application of ADC, PSAD, and PI-RADS v2. CONCLUSIONS ADC and PSAD were the 2 most important metrics for distinguishing PCa from benign lesions. The combined model of ADC and PSAD demonstrated satisfactory discrimination and improved clinical net benefit.

Citing Articles

Values of multiparametric and biparametric MRI in diagnosing clinically significant prostate cancer: a multivariate analysis.

Feng X, Chen X, Peng P, Zhou H, Hong Y, Zhu C BMC Urol. 2024; 24(1):40.

PMID: 38365673 PMC: 10870467. DOI: 10.1186/s12894-024-01411-0.


Study on the Diagnostic Value of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound and Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Prostate Cancer.

Pang X, Zhang J, Chen L, Yuan Y, Xu D Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2022; 2022:7983530.

PMID: 35979005 PMC: 9377899. DOI: 10.1155/2022/7983530.

References
1.
Aminsharifi A, Howard L, Wu Y, de Hoedt A, Bailey C, Freedland S . Prostate Specific Antigen Density as a Predictor of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer When the Prostate Specific Antigen is in the Diagnostic Gray Zone: Defining the Optimum Cutoff Point Stratified by Race and Body Mass Index. J Urol. 2018; 200(4):758-766. DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2018.05.016. View

2.
Lu Y, Zhang Q, Yao W, Chen H, Chen J, Xu C . Optimizing prostate cancer accumulating model: combined PI-RADS v2 with prostate specific antigen and its derivative data. Cancer Imaging. 2019; 19(1):26. PMC: 6533650. DOI: 10.1186/s40644-019-0208-6. View

3.
Kim C, Park B, Kim B . Diffusion-weighted MRI at 3 T for the evaluation of prostate cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010; 194(6):1461-9. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.09.3654. View

4.
Ankerst D, Gelfond J, Goros M, Herrera J, Strobl A, Thompson Jr I . Serial Percent Free Prostate Specific Antigen in Combination with Prostate Specific Antigen for Population Based Early Detection of Prostate Cancer. J Urol. 2016; 196(2):355-60. PMC: 4969186. DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.03.011. View

5.
Markin P, Brito A, Moskaleva N, Fodor M, Lartsova E, Shpot Y . Plasma Sarcosine Measured by Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry Distinguishes Prostatic Intraepithelial Neoplasia and Prostate Cancer from Benign Prostate Hyperplasia. Lab Med. 2020; 51(6):566-573. DOI: 10.1093/labmed/lmaa008. View