» Articles » PMID: 35457504

Psychometrics of the Pearlin Mastery Scale Among Family Caregivers of Older Adults Who Require Assistance in Activities of Daily Living

Overview
Publisher MDPI
Date 2022 Apr 23
PMID 35457504
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This study examined the psychometric properties of the seven-item mastery scale among 392 family caregivers of care dependent older adults in a tertiary hospital in Singapore. Item response theory (IRT) analysis and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) were used to assess the scale's psychometric properties. Construct validity was assessed based on correlations between mastery and caregiver burden, depression, and quality of life. Data from the seven-item mastery scale showed acceptable reliability and model fit while IRT analysis showed that response categories were ordered but reflected poor fit for the two positively worded items. Without these two items, responses on the five-item version showed acceptable model fit and had acceptable reliability and high correlation with those on the seven-item version. Item responses on both the seven- and five-item versions show logical correlations with carer self-report on burden, depression, and quality of life. Further psychometric studies of the seven-item mastery scale are warranted. For practical applications such as caregiver screening during hospital admissions, the five-item mastery scale is fit for purpose.

Citing Articles

Exploring the Feasibility of a Caregiver Burden-Mastery Hybrid Assessment Tool With Decision Matrix in a Memory Clinic: A Multimethod Study.

Chan E, Ong Z, Glass Jr G, Ang S, Lim J, Ali N SAGE Open Nurs. 2024; 10:23779608241307002.

PMID: 39711854 PMC: 11660070. DOI: 10.1177/23779608241307002.


The psychometric properties of the Pearlin Mastery Scale in persons living with restless legs syndrome.

Hellstrom A, Pakpour A, Odzakovic E, Bjork M, Ulander M, Knutsson S PLoS One. 2024; 19(10):e0311259.

PMID: 39352914 PMC: 11444402. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0311259.


Family Caregiving of Patients With Heart Failure and Vascular Dementia in Rural Appalachia: A Mixed-Methods Study.

Piamjariyakul U, Wang K, Smith M, Young S, Shafique S, Navia R West J Nurs Res. 2024; 46(5):344-355.

PMID: 38551329 PMC: 11182019. DOI: 10.1177/01939459241242536.


Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Properties of the Traditional Chinese Version of the Italian Spine Youth Quality of Life (ISYQOL) Questionnaire.

Cheng A, Jim P, Kwan N, Chan S, Cheung J, Cheung P Healthcare (Basel). 2023; 11(19).

PMID: 37830720 PMC: 10572939. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare11192683.


Reactivity of Health-Related Quality of Life to Perceived Stress: The Buffering Role of Psychosocial Resources in a Longitudinal Study of Adults with and Without HIV.

Serrano V, Pasipanodya E, Montoya J, Heaton R, Jeste D, Moore D J Clin Psychol Med Settings. 2023; 31(1):174-185.

PMID: 37204645 PMC: 10924706. DOI: 10.1007/s10880-023-09962-4.

References
1.
Chen Y, Hsiung P, Chung L, Chen S, Pan A . Psychometric properties of the Mastery Scale-Chinese version: applying classical test theory and Rasch analysis. Scand J Occup Ther. 2013; 20(6):404-11. DOI: 10.3109/11038128.2013.838999. View

2.
Chua K, Bohnke J, Prince M, Banerjee S . Health-related quality-of-life assessment in dementia: Evidence of cross-cultural validity in Latin America. Psychol Assess. 2019; 31(10):1264-1277. PMC: 6818683. DOI: 10.1037/pas0000743. View

3.
Togari T, Yonekura Y . A Japanese version of the Pearlin and Schooler's Sense of Mastery Scale. Springerplus. 2015; 4:399. PMC: 4527973. DOI: 10.1186/s40064-015-1186-1. View

4.
Chan E, Glass G, Chua K, Ali N, Lim W . Relationship between Mastery and Caregiving Competence in Protecting against Burden, Anxiety and Depression among Caregivers of Frail Older Adults. J Nutr Health Aging. 2018; 22(10):1238-1245. PMC: 6302747. DOI: 10.1007/s12603-018-1098-1. View

5.
Bjelland I, Dahl A, Haug T, Neckelmann D . The validity of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. An updated literature review. J Psychosom Res. 2002; 52(2):69-77. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3999(01)00296-3. View