» Articles » PMID: 35457445

Impacts of National Drug Price Negotiation on Expenditure, Volume, and Availability of Targeted Anti-Cancer Drugs in China: An Interrupted Time Series Analysis

Overview
Publisher MDPI
Date 2022 Apr 23
PMID 35457445
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The Chinese government has launched six rounds of national drug price negotiation since 2016 to lower the price and expand access to innovative drugs, many of which are anticancer drugs. This study aims to examine the effect of the second round of negotiation at the provincial level on the expenditure, volume, and availability of anti-cancer drugs. Procurement data at the provincial level from January 2017 to September 2018 were extracted from the China Drug Supply Information Platform (CDSIP). The volume, expenditure, and availability of three targeted anti-cancer drugs, rituximab, trastuzumab, and recombinant human endostatin (RHE), in 11 provinces that implemented the policy in September 2017 were analyzed through a controlled interrupted time series (ITS) analysis. A significant 6.0% increase (p < 0.1) in monthly average expenditure, an increase in the volume of 99.51 DDDs (defined daily doses) (p < 0.1), and a 0.24% (p < 0.1) increase in availability were observed for rituximab following the implementation of the policy. The volume and availability of rituximab increased by 949.6 DDDs (p < 0.05) and 1.56%, respectively, immediately after implementation. The availability of trastuzumab increased by 5.14% (p < 0.01) immediately after the implementation while no instant changes in expenditure and volume were observed. A 15% (p < 0.01) increase in monthly expenditure, 3673.17 DDDs increase in volume, and 0.66% increase in availability were observed after the inclusion of Trastuzumab. However, for RHE, only a 0.32% (p < 0.01) increase was observed after its inclusion. Eastern and middle provinces benefited more than western provinces. National negotiation related to the drug price significantly increased the volume and expenditure of anti-cancer drugs and improved their availability. The effect of the policy might be different across different regions and across different anticancer drugs.

Citing Articles

Access to single-inhaler triple medicines for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in China: a national survey on accessibility and utilisation.

Li W, Guo W, Chen H, Lu W, Yu S, Wang M J Pharm Policy Pract. 2025; 18(1):2466215.

PMID: 40070677 PMC: 11894743. DOI: 10.1080/20523211.2025.2466215.


Impacts of National Reimbursement Drug Price Negotiation on drug accessibility, utilization, and cost in China: a systematic review.

Zhu Z, Zhang J, Xu Z, Wang Q, Qi Y, Yang L Int J Equity Health. 2025; 24(1):36.

PMID: 39905408 PMC: 11796270. DOI: 10.1186/s12939-025-02390-w.


Impact of the National Drug Price Negotiation policy on the price, usage, and affordability of anticancer medicines in Shandong Province, China.

Sun Y, Qiang Y, Duan Y, Song Y Front Public Health. 2025; 12():1368718.

PMID: 39839411 PMC: 11747042. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1368718.


Systematic review of the impact of the National Medication Price Negotiated Policy on the accessibility of drugs in China, 2016-2024.

Peng N, Du C, Gong Y, Long X, Wang C, Liu P BMJ Open. 2024; 14(12):e087190.

PMID: 39725414 PMC: 11683965. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-087190.


Analysing the effects of National Centralised Drug Procurement and Price Negotiation Policies on novel hypoglycaemic drug usage and costs in Shanghai, China: an interrupted time series analysis.

Song J, Guo W, Jin C, Xu Y, Hu X, Zhang Z BMJ Open. 2024; 14(12):e088318.

PMID: 39627122 PMC: 11624754. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-088318.


References
1.
Guan X, Zhang Y, Wushouer H, Shi L, Ross-Degnan D, Wagner A . Differences in reimbursement listing of anticancer therapies in China: an observational study. BMJ Open. 2020; 10(1):e031203. PMC: 6955534. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031203. View

2.
Li H, Liu G, Wu J, Wu J, Dong C, Hu S . Recent Pricing Negotiations on Innovative Medicines Pilot in China: Experiences, Implications, and Suggestions. Value Health Reg Issues. 2018; 15:133-137. DOI: 10.1016/j.vhri.2018.01.009. View

3.
Kwon H, Godman B . Drug Pricing in South Korea. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2017; 15(4):447-453. DOI: 10.1007/s40258-017-0307-0. View

4.
Verghese N, Barrenetxea J, Bhargava Y, Agrawal S, Finkelstein E . Government pharmaceutical pricing strategies in the Asia-Pacific region: an overview. J Mark Access Health Policy. 2019; 7(1):1601060. PMC: 6461095. DOI: 10.1080/20016689.2019.1601060. View

5.
Godman B, Bucsics A, Vella Bonanno P, Oortwijn W, Rothe C, Ferrario A . Barriers for Access to New Medicines: Searching for the Balance Between Rising Costs and Limited Budgets. Front Public Health. 2018; 6:328. PMC: 6290038. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2018.00328. View