» Articles » PMID: 35456785

On the Efficacy of HO or SO at Promoting the Inactivation of a Consortium of Cyanobacteria and Bacteria in Algae-Laden Water

Overview
Journal Microorganisms
Specialty Microbiology
Date 2022 Apr 23
PMID 35456785
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Harmful algal blooms in coastal areas can significantly impact a water source. Microorganisms such as cyanobacteria and associated pathogenic bacteria may endanger an ecosystem and human health by causing significant eco-hazards. This study assesses the efficacy of two different reagents, H2O2 and S2O82−, as (pre-)treatment options for algae-laden waters. Anabaena sp. and Vibrio alginolyticus have been selected as target microorganisms. With the objective of activating H2O2 or S2O82−, additional experiments have been performed with the presence of small amounts of iron (18 µmol/L). For the cyanobacterial case, H2O2-based processes demonstrate greater efficiency over that of S2O82−, as Anabaena sp. is particularly affected by H2O2, for which >90% of growth inhibition has been achieved with 0.088 mmol/L of H2O2 (at 72 h of exposure). The response of Anabaena sp. as a co-culture with V. alginolyticus implies the use of major H2O2 amounts for its inactivation (0.29 mmol/L of H2O2), while the effects of H2O2/Fe(II) suggests an improvement of ~60% compared to single H2O2. These H2O2 doses are not sufficient for preventing the regrowth of V. alginolyticus after 24 h. The effects of S2O82− (+ Fe(II)) are moderate, reaching maximum inhibition growth of ~50% for Anabaena sp. at seven days of exposure. Nevertheless, doses of 3 mmol/L of S2O82− can prevent the regrowth of V. alginolyticus. These findings have implications for the mitigation of HABs but also for the associated bacteria that threaten many coastal ecosystems.

Citing Articles

Changes in Cyanobacterial Phytoplankton Communities in Lake-Water Mesocosms Treated with Either Glucose or Hydrogen Peroxide.

Linz D, Partridge C, Hassett M, Sienkiewicz N, Tyrrell K, Henderson A Microorganisms. 2024; 12(9).

PMID: 39338598 PMC: 11434412. DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms12091925.

References
1.
Weenink E, Matthijs H, Schuurmans J, Piel T, Herk M, Sigon C . Interspecific protection against oxidative stress: green algae protect harmful cyanobacteria against hydrogen peroxide. Environ Microbiol. 2021; 23(5):2404-2419. PMC: 8248038. DOI: 10.1111/1462-2920.15429. View

2.
Wert E, Dong M, Rosario-Ortiz F . Using digital flow cytometry to assess the degradation of three cyanobacteria species after oxidation processes. Water Res. 2013; 47(11):3752-61. DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2013.04.038. View

3.
Song Q, Niu X, Zhang D, Song X, Li Y, Ma J . The behaviors of Microcystis aeruginosa and microcystins during the Fe/persulfate (PS) preoxidation-coagulation and flocs storage period. Environ Res. 2020; 186:109549. DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2020.109549. View

4.
Sukenik A, Kaplan A . Cyanobacterial Harmful Algal Blooms in Aquatic Ecosystems: A Comprehensive Outlook on Current and Emerging Mitigation and Control Approaches. Microorganisms. 2021; 9(7). PMC: 8306311. DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms9071472. View

5.
Stevanovic M, Hahn A, Nicolaisen K, Mirus O, Schleiff E . The components of the putative iron transport system in the cyanobacterium Anabaena sp. PCC 7120. Environ Microbiol. 2011; 14(7):1655-70. DOI: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2011.02619.x. View